[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-7850) Indexes that don't support facets being queried should not participate in execution plan

["Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16674397#comment-16674397 ] 

Vikas Saurabh edited comment on OAK-7850 at 11/23/18 11:35 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed on trunk at [r1845730|https://svn.apache.org/r1845730].
Backported to 1.8 at [r1847226|https://svn.apache.org/r1847226].


was (Author: catholicon):
Fixed on trunk at [r1845730|https://svn.apache.org/r1845730].

> Indexes that don't support facets being queried should not participate in execution plan
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-7850
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7850
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.10, 1.9.11, 1.8.10
>
>
> Currently we can have a case where a query with facets can be answered by an index which can resolve all the constraints but don't have facets configured. At times this index might even win the cost war even if there could be an alternative index which might report to be more expensive but can answer the facets.
> While it's not a good practice to have competing indexes, but index selection could have been smarter anyway.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)