You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2006/07/01 02:23:37 UTC
Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to use
them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going on? Is
there a new way to configure all this stuff?
thanks
david jencks
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I've looked over this patch, and after a clean build (mvn clean &&
mvn) + a small change to the patch to fix a GBean reference name, I
don't see any problems... not even an exception on shutdown.
I tested out the JMS Server portlet briefly to start/stop the stomp
connector... works fine. Also tested deployment of new JMS Resources
(dest + factory) which also works fine.
I recommend we apply this patch + minor fix noted above ASAP.
Thanks Hiram for doing this :-)
--jason
On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hey Folks..
>
> Here's a patch that update geronimo to run against amq 4:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2364
>
> Some small little issues are left like the DLQ admin portlet is not
> updated to use the new amq APIS. Also a small exception is barfed at
> shutdown.
>
> But I want to move on to bigger issues like CTS testing. Anybody have
> a link to doco on how to get the cts tests going with the trunk
> version of Geronimo? It's been too long since I last did that.
>
> On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>> Hi David..
>>
>> That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of
>> gbeans have
>> changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the new
>> gbean
>> modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in
>> the CTS I
>> imagine.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>>
>> On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to
>> use
>> > them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
>> > gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going
>> on? Is
>> > there a new way to configure all this stuff?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > david jencks
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 9/1/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> But if I do that then someone is going to start a fuss about no RTC
> or voting, blah, blah, blah. IMO, the PMC needs to make some
> decisions soon about what to do about RTC, either revert to CTR (my
> preference) or use some hybrid along the lines that David Blevins was
> talking about... document the full policy on the wiki (and email of
> course) but definitely on the wiki so we can have something to look
> at and remind us.
I've got it on my todo list far too long. Let me craft it later today.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
This is not just a version change, but also some code change too.
Its all relatively minor though.
I think this should just be committed, as well as with the other even
more trivial changes for log4j and derby versions...
But if I do that then someone is going to start a fuss about no RTC
or voting, blah, blah, blah. IMO, the PMC needs to make some
decisions soon about what to do about RTC, either revert to CTR (my
preference) or use some hybrid along the lines that David Blevins was
talking about... document the full policy on the wiki (and email of
course) but definitely on the wiki so we can have something to look
at and remind us.
--jason
On Sep 1, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Why is this RTC? Looks like a version change to me. I would
> commit it.
>
> But if your really want my vote, I'll be happy to give it ;-)
>
> Jeff
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Anyone else want to vote on this?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Folks..
>>>
>>> Here's a patch that update geronimo to run against amq 4:
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2364
>>>
>>> Some small little issues are left like the DLQ admin portlet is not
>>> updated to use the new amq APIS. Also a small exception is
>>> barfed at
>>> shutdown.
>>>
>>> But I want to move on to bigger issues like CTS testing. Anybody
>>> have
>>> a link to doco on how to get the cts tests going with the trunk
>>> version of Geronimo? It's been too long since I last did that.
>>>
>>> On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi David..
>>>>
>>>> That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of
>>>> gbeans have
>>>> changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the
>>>> new gbean
>>>> modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in
>>>> the CTS I
>>>> imagine.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hiram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried
>>>>> to use
>>>>> them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
>>>>> gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going
>>>>> on? Is
>>>>> there a new way to configure all this stuff?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hiram
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>>
>>> --Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 9/1/06, Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Why is this RTC? Looks like a version change to me. I would commit it.
Well, that stroke me. So, how big a change should NOT be to be
committed at once, without RTC? Yesterday, I asked Jason to report a
JIRA task when he meant to only change a version number. I knew it's
dumb, but he was polite and agreed ;-P I'd appreciate an answer to the
question so I won't do the mistake again.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
Why is this RTC? Looks like a version change to me. I would commit it.
But if your really want my vote, I'll be happy to give it ;-)
Jeff
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Anyone else want to vote on this?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
>> Hey Folks..
>>
>> Here's a patch that update geronimo to run against amq 4:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2364
>>
>> Some small little issues are left like the DLQ admin portlet is not
>> updated to use the new amq APIS. Also a small exception is barfed at
>> shutdown.
>>
>> But I want to move on to bigger issues like CTS testing. Anybody have
>> a link to doco on how to get the cts tests going with the trunk
>> version of Geronimo? It's been too long since I last did that.
>>
>> On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>> Hi David..
>>>
>>> That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of gbeans have
>>> changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the new gbean
>>> modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in
>>> the CTS I
>>> imagine.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> > I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to use
>>> > them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
>>> > gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going on? Is
>>> > there a new way to configure all this stuff?
>>> >
>>> > thanks
>>> > david jencks
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>>
>> --Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Anyone else want to vote on this?
--jason
On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hey Folks..
>
> Here's a patch that update geronimo to run against amq 4:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2364
>
> Some small little issues are left like the DLQ admin portlet is not
> updated to use the new amq APIS. Also a small exception is barfed at
> shutdown.
>
> But I want to move on to bigger issues like CTS testing. Anybody have
> a link to doco on how to get the cts tests going with the trunk
> version of Geronimo? It's been too long since I last did that.
>
> On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>> Hi David..
>>
>> That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of
>> gbeans have
>> changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the new
>> gbean
>> modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in
>> the CTS I
>> imagine.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>>
>> On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to
>> use
>> > them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
>> > gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going
>> on? Is
>> > there a new way to configure all this stuff?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > david jencks
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Has anyone else looked at this patch?
I'd really like to get this committed... and we need some other peeps
to review.
--jason
On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hey Folks..
>
> Here's a patch that update geronimo to run against amq 4:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2364
>
> Some small little issues are left like the DLQ admin portlet is not
> updated to use the new amq APIS. Also a small exception is barfed at
> shutdown.
>
> But I want to move on to bigger issues like CTS testing. Anybody have
> a link to doco on how to get the cts tests going with the trunk
> version of Geronimo? It's been too long since I last did that.
>
> On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>> Hi David..
>>
>> That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of
>> gbeans have
>> changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the new
>> gbean
>> modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in
>> the CTS I
>> imagine.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>>
>> On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to
>> use
>> > them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
>> > gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going
>> on? Is
>> > there a new way to configure all this stuff?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > david jencks
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hey Folks..
Here's a patch that update geronimo to run against amq 4:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2364
Some small little issues are left like the DLQ admin portlet is not
updated to use the new amq APIS. Also a small exception is barfed at
shutdown.
But I want to move on to bigger issues like CTS testing. Anybody have
a link to doco on how to get the cts tests going with the trunk
version of Geronimo? It's been too long since I last did that.
On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi David..
>
> That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of gbeans have
> changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the new gbean
> modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in the CTS I
> imagine.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
>
> On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to use
> > them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
> > gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going on? Is
> > there a new way to configure all this stuff?
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Are the new activemq gbean modules complete?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hi David..
That's still work that I've got on my plate to do. The # of gbeans have
changed for activemq 4. So before we switch to amq 4 and the new gbean
modules, I'll have to update lots of plans. Including the ones in the CTS I
imagine.
Regards,
Hiram
On 6/30/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I got the new amq gbean modules to compile under m2 and tried to use
> them in the activemq-broker plan but there seem to be a lot more
> gbean classes in the plan than in the modules. What's going on? Is
> there a new way to configure all this stuff?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com