You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by graham <gr...@theseamans.net> on 2007/06/21 15:25:59 UTC

Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Luis Moreira (ESI-GSQP) wrote:
> This is not an "Apache answer", but it may help you.
> 
> Do the IPs vary too much, or can you set up a firewall rule to block
> incoming requests (any requests) from those IP ?

No, the ip addresses vary too much. I just started apache again, and the 
new batch of ip addresses are clearly continuing the same web crawl, but 
totally different from the previous ones. Still based in China though.

obrigado pela simpatia...

Graham

> Sort of your own very personal "black list"?
> Of course, should that address decide to post a legitimate request, it would
> get blocked but hey, who told them to mess up the first time?
> 
> On the other hand, on http://www.dnsstuff.com/ you can find info on IP
> addresses on the net.
> Who and were they are, if they belong to spam lists, etc
> 
> 
> May the farce be with you
> 
> 
> Luis
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: graham [mailto:graham@theseamans.net] 
> Sent: quinta-feira, 21 de Junho de 2007 13:47
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2
> whenunder attack
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've just become involved with a system running apache2.0.55 on ubuntu 
> with linux 2.6.17.
> 
> The system is currently unable to run due to repeated downloads of a 
> large number of pdfs by systems located in China. These are hogging all 
> sockets and eventually causing apache to die (I'm appending more details 
> below in case I've got the wrong end of the stick). The ip address of 
> these systems varies; they are not a single block, although they are 
> obviously working together (different ip addresses will ask for 
> sequentially related pdfs). Each ip address will request multiple files 
> in parallel.
> 
> I'm told that the limit_ipconn module would solve my problem by limiting 
> the simultaneous accesses from any one ip address. There is no version 
> of this available for apache2 on ubuntu. I'm wondering if this is 
> because similar abilities have been built into apache2 itself, but 
> haven't managed to find any.
> 
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks
> Graham
> -----------------------------------------------
> Notes from log:
> 
> The system is running ok, not at particularly heavy load (<1.0), and 
> apache is apparently running ok and not reporting errors [corrected later].
> 
> Tailing the apache log file shows that the only accesses to the system 
> are GETs of pdfs from two chinese systems, 218.4.152.91 and 
> 222.218.254.221, which are obviously running the same software.
> 
> These systems are trying to systematically work their way through 
> downloading all chinese pdfs. When a pdf is too large and the download 
> times out, they immediately try again (at any one moment each system is 
> trying to download 3 or 4 pdfs).
> 
> If I restart apache, I immediately get accesses from all over the place, 
> including the 2 chinese systems. Eventually the Chinese accesses capture 
> all the apache processes, and nothing else can get access.
> 
> 'Solution' found for this: turn apache off for a few minutes. The 
> chinese systems went away, and all was fine again.
> 
> One hour later ¶
> 
> The chinese systems, and the problems, returned. A little more data this 
> time.
> 
> Once the chinese systems are established, netstat shows that they occupy 
> most sockets but are mostly in CLOSE_WAIT state. All other requests are 
> stuck in SYNC_RECV.
> 
> After this continues for a while the apache processes gradually start to 
> die off with the following sequence:
> 
> alert] (11): setuid: unable to change to uid: 33 (33 is www-data)
> 
> [alert] Child 691 returned a Fatal error... Apache is exiting!
> 
> [emerg] (43): couldn't grab the accept mutex
> 
> semop: Invalid argument
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


RE: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Posted by Bob <bo...@a1poweruser.com>.
Bob wrote:
>
> If this is a real attack then you were found by rolling through a whole
> block of ip address looking for a open port 80.
> Change your apache server to use different port say 7788 instead of port 80
> and then use the free www.zoneedit.com dns service to redirect all FQDN to
> your websit to include the new port.  From that point on only access to your
> site would have to done through FQDN.  And all those attack port 80 packets
> would find no web server at port 80 ending this and future attacks leaving
> all your normal server request using your FQDN working as they do now. This
> is called hiding in plain sight.

Apache does this, if you ask it.  Make the 1st named virtual host (the
default, or fallback host) ServerName example.com, and then completely
blackhole all requests through a trivial AliasMatch .* -> /htdocs/noaccess.html.

If there is no Host: or a worthless Host: header from the browser/spider/
malicious user, there will be nothing to serve for that user.

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:11 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

I tried your      AliasMatch .* -> /usr/local/www/data/noaccess.htm    statement and get syntax error
Saying "AliasMatch takes two arguments, a regular expression and a file name
I do have a file at /usr/local/www/data/noaccess.htm 
 
NameVirtualHost *

<VirtualHost *>
  ServerName default.only
 AliasMatch .* -> /usr/local/www/data/noaccess.htm
  <Location />
    Order allow,deny
    Deny from all
  </Location>
</VirtualHost>


      


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Bob wrote:
> 
> If this is a real attack then you were found by rolling through a whole
> block of ip address looking for a open port 80.
> Change your apache server to use different port say 7788 instead of port 80
> and then use the free www.zoneedit.com dns service to redirect all FQDN to
> your websit to include the new port.  From that point on only access to your
> site would have to done through FQDN.  And all those attack port 80 packets
> would find no web server at port 80 ending this and future attacks leaving
> all your normal server request using your FQDN working as they do now. This
> is called hiding in plain sight.

Apache does this, if you ask it.  Make the 1st named virtual host (the
default, or fallback host) ServerName example.com, and then completely
blackhole all requests through a trivial AliasMatch .* -> /htdocs/noaccess.html.

If there is no Host: or a worthless Host: header from the browser/spider/
malicious user, there will be nothing to serve for that user.

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Posted by graham <gr...@theseamans.net>.
Bob wrote:

> If this activity continues for more that 10 days then it's not normal search
> engine indexing but really a attack designed to generate a denial of service
> situation for your server to stop the Chinese public from accessing you. The
> Chinese government is known to do this sort of thing to restrict their
> citizen's access, specially if what you have is considered undesirable
> information by the Chinese government. So what is the subject matter covered
> by these Chinese pdf's ?????

Complete works of Marx, Lenin etc. So yes, it's perfectly possible that 
it's deliberate. I don't think it matters too much either way in the 
sense that a fix is a fix. Actually, if it's not a deliberate attack I 
think it's more likely to be a clumsy attempt to download and replicate 
the site than to index it. Which unfortunately means your neat solution 
won't help us.

Graham

> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


RE: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Posted by Bob <bo...@a1poweruser.com>.

-----Original Message-----
Bob wrote:
> Is there a valid reason based on your web server content that people from
> China would be accessing your site?

Yes, we have a very large quantity of pdfs in Chinese. Converting them
to html would presumably reduce the load but I don't think the manpower
to do that is there.


> If this is a real attack then you were found by rolling through a whole
> block of ip address looking for a open port 80.
> Change your apache server to use different port say 7788 instead of port
80
> and then use the free www.zoneedit.com dns service to redirect all FQDN to
> your websit to include the new port.  From that point on only access to
your
> site would have to done through FQDN.  And all those attack port 80
packets
> would find no web server at port 80 ending this and future attacks leaving
> all your normal server request using your FQDN working as they do now.
This
> is called hiding in plain sight.
>

I'm not actually convinced it's an attack, rather than an incompetent
spider. Some of the hits come from referrers (other Chinese sites) which
have built up a long index of our files, and the spider which is causing
the problem is simply running repeatedly through those.

But it's an interesting idea; do you have any references from people who
have done this, what the potential snags are, etc?

Graham

From: graham [mailto:graham@theseamans.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:07 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2
whenunder attack

I have been running my apache web server in the above described manner for 6
years now with out any problems. This technique is described in a apache
security book I have. I use a firewall to block inbound port 80 and see 20
to 150 daily unsolicited hits on port 80. These are all caused be people
scanning a block of ip address searching for open port 80. Once you are
found this way your ip address gets posted to news groups where underground
attackers share lists of ip address with open port 80. Once you have been
posted there, you will really see a large increase of PHP CONNECT attacks.

Since you are serving very large quantity of pdfs in Chinese it may just be
a matter of time until the China search engines get you indexed for the
first time then things should settle down to normal.

If this activity continues for more that 10 days then it's not normal search
engine indexing but really a attack designed to generate a denial of service
situation for your server to stop the Chinese public from accessing you. The
Chinese government is known to do this sort of thing to restrict their
citizen's access, specially if what you have is considered undesirable
information by the Chinese government. So what is the subject matter covered
by these Chinese pdf's ?????

Bob





---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Posted by graham <gr...@theseamans.net>.
Bob wrote:
> Is there a valid reason based on your web server content that people from
> China would be accessing your site? 

Yes, we have a very large quantity of pdfs in Chinese. Converting them 
to html would presumably reduce the load but I don't think the manpower 
to do that is there.

>If not then just deny packets from the
> complete range of IP address allocated to China??? Many email servers do
> that to cut off spam from China. Maybe what you are seeing is China search
> engine robots trying to index your site. You could always add a robot.txt
> file to your server's path and deny search engine access.
>

As stated above, I'm afraid that's not possible.


> If this is a real attack then you were found by rolling through a whole
> block of ip address looking for a open port 80.
> Change your apache server to use different port say 7788 instead of port 80
> and then use the free www.zoneedit.com dns service to redirect all FQDN to
> your websit to include the new port.  From that point on only access to your
> site would have to done through FQDN.  And all those attack port 80 packets
> would find no web server at port 80 ending this and future attacks leaving
> all your normal server request using your FQDN working as they do now. This
> is called hiding in plain sight.
>

I'm not actually convinced it's an attack, rather than an incompetent 
spider. Some of the hits come from referrers (other Chinese sites) which 
have built up a long index of our files, and the spider which is causing 
the problem is simply running repeatedly through those.

But it's an interesting idea; do you have any references from people who 
have done this, what the potential snags are, etc?

Graham

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: graham [mailto:graham@theseamans.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:26 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2
> whenunder attack
> 
> Luis Moreira (ESI-GSQP) wrote:
>> This is not an "Apache answer", but it may help you.
>>
>> Do the IPs vary too much, or can you set up a firewall rule to block
>> incoming requests (any requests) from those IP ?
> 
> No, the ip addresses vary too much. I just started apache again, and the
> new batch of ip addresses are clearly continuing the same web crawl, but
> totally different from the previous ones. Still based in China though.
> 
> obrigado pela simpatia...
> 
> Graham
> 
>> Sort of your own very personal "black list"?
>> Of course, should that address decide to post a legitimate request, it
> would
>> get blocked but hey, who told them to mess up the first time?
>>
>> On the other hand, on http://www.dnsstuff.com/ you can find info on IP
>> addresses on the net.
>> Who and were they are, if they belong to spam lists, etc
>>
>>
>> May the farce be with you
>>
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: graham [mailto:graham@theseamans.net]
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 21 de Junho de 2007 13:47
>> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2
>> whenunder attack
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just become involved with a system running apache2.0.55 on ubuntu
>> with linux 2.6.17.
>>
>> The system is currently unable to run due to repeated downloads of a
>> large number of pdfs by systems located in China. These are hogging all
>> sockets and eventually causing apache to die (I'm appending more details
>> below in case I've got the wrong end of the stick). The ip address of
>> these systems varies; they are not a single block, although they are
>> obviously working together (different ip addresses will ask for
>> sequentially related pdfs). Each ip address will request multiple files
>> in parallel.
>>
>> I'm told that the limit_ipconn module would solve my problem by limiting
>> the simultaneous accesses from any one ip address. There is no version
>> of this available for apache2 on ubuntu. I'm wondering if this is
>> because similar abilities have been built into apache2 itself, but
>> haven't managed to find any.
>>
>> Does anyone have any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Graham
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> Notes from log:
>>
>> The system is running ok, not at particularly heavy load (<1.0), and
>> apache is apparently running ok and not reporting errors [corrected
> later].
>> Tailing the apache log file shows that the only accesses to the system
>> are GETs of pdfs from two chinese systems, 218.4.152.91 and
>> 222.218.254.221, which are obviously running the same software.
>>
>> These systems are trying to systematically work their way through
>> downloading all chinese pdfs. When a pdf is too large and the download
>> times out, they immediately try again (at any one moment each system is
>> trying to download 3 or 4 pdfs).
>>
>> If I restart apache, I immediately get accesses from all over the place,
>> including the 2 chinese systems. Eventually the Chinese accesses capture
>> all the apache processes, and nothing else can get access.
>>
>> 'Solution' found for this: turn apache off for a few minutes. The
>> chinese systems went away, and all was fine again.
>>
>> One hour later ¶
>>
>> The chinese systems, and the problems, returned. A little more data this
>> time.
>>
>> Once the chinese systems are established, netstat shows that they occupy
>> most sockets but are mostly in CLOSE_WAIT state. All other requests are
>> stuck in SYNC_RECV.
>>
>> After this continues for a while the apache processes gradually start to
>> die off with the following sequence:
>>
>> alert] (11): setuid: unable to change to uid: 33 (33 is www-data)
>>
>> [alert] Child 691 returned a Fatal error... Apache is exiting!
>>
>> [emerg] (43): couldn't grab the accept mutex
>>
>> semop: Invalid argument
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
>> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
>> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


RE: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2 whenunder attack

Posted by Bob <bo...@a1poweruser.com>.
Is there a valid reason based on your web server content that people from
China would be accessing your site? If not then just deny packets from the
complete range of IP address allocated to China??? Many email servers do
that to cut off spam from China. Maybe what you are seeing is China search
engine robots trying to index your site. You could always add a robot.txt
file to your server's path and deny search engine access.

If this is a real attack then you were found by rolling through a whole
block of ip address looking for a open port 80.
Change your apache server to use different port say 7788 instead of port 80
and then use the free www.zoneedit.com dns service to redirect all FQDN to
your websit to include the new port.  From that point on only access to your
site would have to done through FQDN.  And all those attack port 80 packets
would find no web server at port 80 ending this and future attacks leaving
all your normal server request using your FQDN working as they do now. This
is called hiding in plain sight.


-----Original Message-----
From: graham [mailto:graham@theseamans.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:26 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2
whenunder attack

Luis Moreira (ESI-GSQP) wrote:
> This is not an "Apache answer", but it may help you.
>
> Do the IPs vary too much, or can you set up a firewall rule to block
> incoming requests (any requests) from those IP ?

No, the ip addresses vary too much. I just started apache again, and the
new batch of ip addresses are clearly continuing the same web crawl, but
totally different from the previous ones. Still based in China though.

obrigado pela simpatia...

Graham

> Sort of your own very personal "black list"?
> Of course, should that address decide to post a legitimate request, it
would
> get blocked but hey, who told them to mess up the first time?
>
> On the other hand, on http://www.dnsstuff.com/ you can find info on IP
> addresses on the net.
> Who and were they are, if they belong to spam lists, etc
>
>
> May the farce be with you
>
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: graham [mailto:graham@theseamans.net]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 21 de Junho de 2007 13:47
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [users@httpd] limiting connections per ip address in apache2
> whenunder attack
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just become involved with a system running apache2.0.55 on ubuntu
> with linux 2.6.17.
>
> The system is currently unable to run due to repeated downloads of a
> large number of pdfs by systems located in China. These are hogging all
> sockets and eventually causing apache to die (I'm appending more details
> below in case I've got the wrong end of the stick). The ip address of
> these systems varies; they are not a single block, although they are
> obviously working together (different ip addresses will ask for
> sequentially related pdfs). Each ip address will request multiple files
> in parallel.
>
> I'm told that the limit_ipconn module would solve my problem by limiting
> the simultaneous accesses from any one ip address. There is no version
> of this available for apache2 on ubuntu. I'm wondering if this is
> because similar abilities have been built into apache2 itself, but
> haven't managed to find any.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
> Thanks
> Graham
> -----------------------------------------------
> Notes from log:
>
> The system is running ok, not at particularly heavy load (<1.0), and
> apache is apparently running ok and not reporting errors [corrected
later].
>
> Tailing the apache log file shows that the only accesses to the system
> are GETs of pdfs from two chinese systems, 218.4.152.91 and
> 222.218.254.221, which are obviously running the same software.
>
> These systems are trying to systematically work their way through
> downloading all chinese pdfs. When a pdf is too large and the download
> times out, they immediately try again (at any one moment each system is
> trying to download 3 or 4 pdfs).
>
> If I restart apache, I immediately get accesses from all over the place,
> including the 2 chinese systems. Eventually the Chinese accesses capture
> all the apache processes, and nothing else can get access.
>
> 'Solution' found for this: turn apache off for a few minutes. The
> chinese systems went away, and all was fine again.
>
> One hour later ¶
>
> The chinese systems, and the problems, returned. A little more data this
> time.
>
> Once the chinese systems are established, netstat shows that they occupy
> most sockets but are mostly in CLOSE_WAIT state. All other requests are
> stuck in SYNC_RECV.
>
> After this continues for a while the apache processes gradually start to
> die off with the following sequence:
>
> alert] (11): setuid: unable to change to uid: 33 (33 is www-data)
>
> [alert] Child 691 returned a Fatal error... Apache is exiting!
>
> [emerg] (43): couldn't grab the accept mutex
>
> semop: Invalid argument
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org