You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> on 2008/04/19 04:09:44 UTC
Should we release 3.4?
I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus code
(yes plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
-dain
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
Thank you
-dain
On May 5, 2008, at 12:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'll start it now :-)
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> Sounds good. Jason Van Zyl said he would do the release, but I
>> think he got
>> busy. If no one else gets to it, I'll do start the release process
>> when I
>> get back from JavaOne.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I don't think the release process has been started yet, but i have a
>>> bug fix pending, so please hold on a bit.
>>> I will check it in as soon as svn is up again.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus
>>>> code
>> (yes
>>>> plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I'll start it now :-)
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> Sounds good. Jason Van Zyl said he would do the release, but I think he got
> busy. If no one else gets to it, I'll do start the release process when I
> get back from JavaOne.
>
> -dain
>
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>
> > I don't think the release process has been started yet, but i have a
> > bug fix pending, so please hold on a bit.
> > I will check it in as soon as svn is up again.
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus code
> (yes
> > > plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
> > >
> > > -dain
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
Sounds good. Jason Van Zyl said he would do the release, but I think
he got busy. If no one else gets to it, I'll do start the release
process when I get back from JavaOne.
-dain
On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I don't think the release process has been started yet, but i have a
> bug fix pending, so please hold on a bit.
> I will check it in as soon as svn is up again.
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus
>> code (yes
>> plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>>
>> -dain
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I don't think the release process has been started yet, but i have a
bug fix pending, so please hold on a bit.
I will check it in as soon as svn is up again.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus code (yes
> plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>
> -dain
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
good idea
david jencks
On Apr 19, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus
>> code (yes
>> plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>>
>> -dain
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus code (yes
> plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>
> -dain
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Jacek Laskowski
<ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> I'm fine with the release, esp. if it helps maven much. Just curious,
> what's wrong with their previous implementation - they had some kind
> of reflection code in their code, didn't they?
Ah, openejb benefits from 3.4 release, too as it relies on
org.apache.openejb:xbean-finder:3.4-r636443-SNAPSHOT.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Apr 21, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> I only had to add support for match by type which is suported by
>> the new
>> method public void setAutoMatchProperty(String type, Object value) on
>> ObjectRecipe.
>
> I'm fine with the release, esp. if it helps maven much. Just curious,
> what's wrong with their previous implementation - they had some kind
> of reflection code in their code, didn't they?
There was nothing wrong with their pervious implementation. XBean
reflect simply has more features and a small community of users adding
more features and fix bugs.
-dain
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> I only had to add support for match by type which is suported by the new
> method public void setAutoMatchProperty(String type, Object value) on
> ObjectRecipe.
I'm fine with the release, esp. if it helps maven much. Just curious,
what's wrong with their previous implementation - they had some kind
of reflection code in their code, didn't they?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
I only had to add support for match by type which is suported by the
new method public void setAutoMatchProperty(String type, Object value)
on ObjectRecipe.
-dain
On Apr 19, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Just curious, what did we add to get things to work for them?
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus
>> code (yes plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>>
>> -dain
>>
>
Re: Should we release 3.4?
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Sounds good to me.
Just curious, what did we add to get things to work for them?
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus
> code (yes plexus is now using xbean-reflect).
>
> -dain
>