You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> on 2006/02/14 17:06:47 UTC
JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:11:24 -0800 07:08:28 -0500, Adam Winer said:
AW> - the lack (AFAIK) of a JSF impl in the public maven
AW> repository - obviously, we can trivially point that to
AW> MyFaces api and impl
AW> - Our tests use a Mock JSF impl that's just a mockmaker
AW> run over jsf-api - but that's not totally ASF-legit.
AW> We've included that jar in this distribution, but this needs
AW> to be redone the right way.
Just so you know, JSF 1.2 is now available in the public maven 1 repo at
maven.repo.remote=https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/,http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/
Of course, this won't work for several reasons:
1. It's a Maven 1 Repo.
2. It's JSF 1.2.
Ed
--
| ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
| 64 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
I think it was John Fallows that told me there's a way to set up
Maven2 to add in a Maven 1 repository. Dunno the details,
and obviously it'd be better to have it as a full maven 2
artifact including the pom.
-- Adam
On 2/14/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there plans for maven2 artifacts?
>
> Sean
>
> On 2/14/06, Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:11:24 -0800 07:08:28 -0500, Adam Winer said:
> >
> > AW> - the lack (AFAIK) of a JSF impl in the public maven
> > AW> repository - obviously, we can trivially point that to
> > AW> MyFaces api and impl
> > AW> - Our tests use a Mock JSF impl that's just a mockmaker
> > AW> run over jsf-api - but that's not totally ASF-legit.
> > AW> We've included that jar in this distribution, but this needs
> > AW> to be redone the right way.
> >
> > Just so you know, JSF 1.2 is now available in the public maven 1 repo at
> >
> > maven.repo.remote=https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/,http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/
> >
> > Of course, this won't work for several reasons:
> >
> > 1. It's a Maven 1 Repo.
> >
> > 2. It's JSF 1.2.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > --
> > | ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> > | homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
> > | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
> > | 64 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
> >
> >
>
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 2/14/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there plans for maven2 artifacts?
You can use it with m2 by configuring it as a legacy repository:
<project>
...
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>java-net</id>
<name>java.net Repository</name>
<url>https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/</url>
<layout>legacy</layout>
</repository>
...
</repositories>
...
--
Wendy
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 2/20/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> one / zero = infinity ;-)
>
> you talk about the configuration of the ExtensionsFilter there, right?
>
> ;)
>
> no line - no mails
> one line - infinite amount of mails
Precisely. ;-)
regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/21/06, John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2/18/06, Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:40 -0800, John Fallows
> > <jo...@gmail.com> said:
> > >
> > > JF> Wendy is exactly right. Of course, it would be much more
> convenient
> > > JF> if the JSF 1.2 jars were on ibiblio.org to avoid the extra
> > > JF> configuration to pick up the java.netrepository.
> > >
> > > "much", I don't know about that. How hard is one line?
> >
> > one / zero = infinity ;-)
> >
> > I agree though, at least there is only one line in the pom.xml shared by
> all
> > users as opposed to one line of extra configuration *per user* as
> originally
> > posted.
> >
> >
> > > JF> I believe there is work already underway to establish an automatic
> > > JF> sync for some of the java.net artifacts to ibiblio.org.
> > >
> > > There are legal issues that must be resolved to make this happen.
> > > Believe me, I had to work with lawyers just to enable getting the jars
> > > out on java.net.
> >
> > Yep, guessed as much - that's why I was wondering if any additional
> progress
> > had been made on this front at the same time.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > John Fallows.
> > --
> > http://apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10044
> > Author: Pro JSF and Ajax: Building Rich Internet Components, Apress
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10044
Author: Pro JSF and Ajax: Building Rich Internet Components, Apress
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
one / zero = infinity ;-)
you talk about the configuration of the ExtensionsFilter there, right?
;)
no line - no mails
one line - infinite amount of mails
regards,
Martin
On 2/21/06, John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/18/06, Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:40 -0800, John Fallows
> <jo...@gmail.com> said:
> >
> > JF> Wendy is exactly right. Of course, it would be much more convenient
> > JF> if the JSF 1.2 jars were on ibiblio.org to avoid the extra
> > JF> configuration to pick up the java.netrepository.
> >
> > "much", I don't know about that. How hard is one line?
>
> one / zero = infinity ;-)
>
> I agree though, at least there is only one line in the pom.xml shared by all
> users as opposed to one line of extra configuration *per user* as originally
> posted.
>
>
> > JF> I believe there is work already underway to establish an automatic
> > JF> sync for some of the java.net artifacts to ibiblio.org.
> >
> > There are legal issues that must be resolved to make this happen.
> > Believe me, I had to work with lawyers just to enable getting the jars
> > out on java.net.
>
> Yep, guessed as much - that's why I was wondering if any additional progress
> had been made on this front at the same time.
>
> Kind Regards,
> John Fallows.
> --
> http://apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10044
> Author: Pro JSF and Ajax: Building Rich Internet Components, Apress
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 2/18/06, Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:40 -0800, John Fallows <
> john.r.fallows@gmail.com> said:
>
> JF> Wendy is exactly right. Of course, it would be much more convenient
> JF> if the JSF 1.2 jars were on ibiblio.org to avoid the extra
> JF> configuration to pick up the java.netrepository.
>
> "much", I don't know about that. How hard is one line?
one / zero = infinity ;-)
I agree though, at least there is only one line in the pom.xml shared by all
users as opposed to one line of extra configuration *per user* as originally
posted.
JF> I believe there is work already underway to establish an automatic
> JF> sync for some of the java.net artifacts to ibiblio.org.
>
> There are legal issues that must be resolved to make this happen.
> Believe me, I had to work with lawyers just to enable getting the jars
> out on java.net.
Yep, guessed as much - that's why I was wondering if any additional progress
had been made on this front at the same time.
Kind Regards,
John Fallows.
--
http://apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10044
Author: Pro JSF and Ajax: Building Rich Internet Components, Apress
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com>.
>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:40 -0800, John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com> said:
JF> Wendy is exactly right. Of course, it would be much more convenient
JF> if the JSF 1.2 jars were on ibiblio.org to avoid the extra
JF> configuration to pick up the java.netrepository.
"much", I don't know about that. How hard is one line?
JF> I believe there is work already underway to establish an automatic
JF> sync for some of the java.net artifacts to ibiblio.org.
There are legal issues that must be resolved to make this happen.
Believe me, I had to work with lawyers just to enable getting the jars
out on java.net.
Ed
--
| ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
| 62 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com>.
Wendy is exactly right.
Of course, it would be much more convenient if the JSF 1.2 jars were on
ibiblio.org to avoid the extra configuration to pick up the java.netrepository.
I believe there is work already underway to establish an automatic sync for
some of the java.net artifacts to ibiblio.org.
Kind Regards,
John Fallows.
On 2/15/06, Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:00:38 -0500, Sean Schofield <
> sean.schofield@gmail.com> said:
>
> SS> Are there plans for maven2 artifacts?
>
> I've heard it's possible to access an m1 repo from m2.
>
> We'll try to update the plugin to m2 and take it from there.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> | homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
> | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
> | 63 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
>
>
--
http://apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10044
Author: Pro JSF and Ajax: Building Rich Internet Components, Apress
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com>.
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:00:38 -0500, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> said:
SS> Are there plans for maven2 artifacts?
I've heard it's possible to access an m1 repo from m2.
We'll try to update the plugin to m2 and take it from there.
Ed
--
| ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
| 63 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Are there plans for maven2 artifacts?
Sean
On 2/14/06, Ed Burns <ed...@sun.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:11:24 -0800 07:08:28 -0500, Adam Winer said:
>
> AW> - the lack (AFAIK) of a JSF impl in the public maven
> AW> repository - obviously, we can trivially point that to
> AW> MyFaces api and impl
> AW> - Our tests use a Mock JSF impl that's just a mockmaker
> AW> run over jsf-api - but that's not totally ASF-legit.
> AW> We've included that jar in this distribution, but this needs
> AW> to be redone the right way.
>
> Just so you know, JSF 1.2 is now available in the public maven 1 repo at
>
> maven.repo.remote=https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/,http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/
>
> Of course, this won't work for several reasons:
>
> 1. It's a Maven 1 Repo.
>
> 2. It's JSF 1.2.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> | homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
> | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
> | 64 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
>
>