Re: [DISCUSS] roll OWB and Meecrowave releases?

[Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>]

@Mark: would you have time to let openjpa go out? I can take meecrowave
release after if it helps.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 27 oct. 2020 à 21:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Yep but it is likely never used as such in normal apps (all but jsf) or it
> is indirected by an appscoped bean injection so no real issue ;).
>
> Real issue is that our configuration objext constructor has logic broken
> by proxying so this was the least  breaking solution - ignoring ugly
> try/catch(noop) - IMHO.
>
> Happy to refine if it breaks users but i dont see an use case today.
>
> Le mar. 27 oct. 2020 à 21:00, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid> a
> écrit :
>
>> Basically +1, but remember that one needs to deal with Serializable
>> themselves when directly injecting beans. Plus our @ApplicationScoped
>> normalscoping proxies are blazingly fast. There is simply no performance
>> benefit at all. It's pure java native delegation which likely even gets
>> erased in JIT.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> > Am 26.10.2020 um 21:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Just to let you know, i did a few changes:
>> >
>> > 1. dropped some transitive but undesired dependencies of cxf (jboss rmi
>> > spec jar for ex)
>> > 2. make configuration and meecrowave beans (as cdi beans) @Dependent.
>> > Functionally they are singleton but we likely want to avoid to reproxy
>> them
>> > since the producer is handling the singleton behavior. It also avoids
>> > proxying issues in "without unsafe" mode.
>> > 3. enabled to use jpa extension without using unsafe (just a scope fix)
>> > 4. upgraded to owb snapshot to avoid breaking our logging configuration
>> > (without owb snapshot OWB will always use JUL and never log4j2 until you
>> > set it yourself on the JVM which is undesired and a regression).
>> >
>> > So long story short: think we are good to release as soon as cxf,
>> openjpa
>> > and owb are released so guess we will wait for the first one or "up" the
>> > thread about it mainly?
>> > wdyt?
>> > I can handle owb/meecrowave ones if you want.
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Le dim. 18 oct. 2020 à 11:40, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
>> a
>> > écrit :
>> >
>> >> hmm, jus figured that this also affects OWB. Will re-roll the OWB
>> release.
>> >>
>> >> LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Am 18.10.2020 um 11:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >>> :
>> >>>
>> >>> Le dim. 18 oct. 2020 à 10:16, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
>> >
>> >> a
>> >>> écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>>> What do you mean with asm9 did leak?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Xbean shade brings ow2 asm9 so we have undesired deps now. Must be
>> >> exluded
>> >>> from dep tree.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> And will also roll an openjpa release.
>> >>>> But that's an optional dependency, so doesn't matter that much.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It does for our oauth2 module and fatjar and openjpa users which now
>> >>> manages 2 xbean shades (which is undesired).
>> >>> Guess we can wait 1 week for that and it is worth for consistency.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> LieGrue,
>> >>>> strub
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Am 18.10.2020 um 09:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> >> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >>>>> :
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1 once asm dependencies are aligned and fixed (asm9 leaked so must
>> be
>> >>>>> excluded and openjpa should be upgraded)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> >>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> >>>>> <
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Le dim. 18 oct. 2020 à 07:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> a
>> >>>>> écrit :
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> +1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Go ahead ;)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks !
>> >>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>> JB
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Le 17 oct. 2020 à 23:36, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>
>> a
>> >>>>>> écrit :
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> hi folks!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I'd like to start OWB and Meecrowave Releases tomorrow morning.
>> >>>>>>> Please shout if there is something to fix still.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>>>>>> strub
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>