You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/02/08 18:47:07 UTC

[jira] Commented: (IO-71) [io] PipedUtils

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567126#action_12567126 ] 

Jukka Zitting commented on IO-71:
---------------------------------

How is this different from the piped input and output streams in java.io?

> [io] PipedUtils
> ---------------
>
>                 Key: IO-71
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-71
>             Project: Commons IO
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Utilities
>         Environment: Operating System: All
> Platform: All
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.x
>
>         Attachments: PipedUtils.zip
>
>
> I developed some nifty code that takes an OutputStream and sort  of  reverses it as if it were an 
> InputStream.  Error passing and  handling  close is dealt with.  It needs another thread to do the  work 
> which  runs in parallel.  It uses Piped streams.  I created  this because I  had to conform 
> GZIPOutputStream to my framework  which demanded an  InputStream.
> See URL to source.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.