You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/02/08 18:47:07 UTC
[jira] Commented: (IO-71) [io] PipedUtils
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567126#action_12567126 ]
Jukka Zitting commented on IO-71:
---------------------------------
How is this different from the piped input and output streams in java.io?
> [io] PipedUtils
> ---------------
>
> Key: IO-71
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-71
> Project: Commons IO
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utilities
> Environment: Operating System: All
> Platform: All
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.x
>
> Attachments: PipedUtils.zip
>
>
> I developed some nifty code that takes an OutputStream and sort of reverses it as if it were an
> InputStream. Error passing and handling close is dealt with. It needs another thread to do the work
> which runs in parallel. It uses Piped streams. I created this because I had to conform
> GZIPOutputStream to my framework which demanded an InputStream.
> See URL to source.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.