You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2011/01/26 14:51:29 UTC

[Trinidad] jsf2_ajax N branches

Hi,

do we still need the various jsf2_ajax branches?

Thx,
Matthias

-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] jsf2_ajax N branches

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.

ok, unless if hear different, lemme delete em tomorrow

-M

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:34 PM, MAX STARETS <ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I don't think so.
>
> Max
>
> On 1/26/2011 8:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> do we still need the various jsf2_ajax branches?
>>
>> Thx,
>> Matthias
>>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] jsf2_ajax N branches

Posted by MAX STARETS <ma...@oracle.com>.

I don't think so.

Max

On 1/26/2011 8:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do we still need the various jsf2_ajax branches?
>
> Thx,
> Matthias
>