You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@struts.apache.org by "Don Brown (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/02/09 22:03:16 UTC

[jira] Commented: (SITE-8) Website archive handling

    [ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SITE-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40065 ] 

Don Brown commented on SITE-8:
------------------------------

I think so.  Some folks put beta software into production, so we should have accessible docs.

> Website archive handling
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: SITE-8
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SITE-8
>             Project: Struts Shared Resources
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ted Husted
>
> We have started to provide archives of past GA releases on the website under folders named for the version. 
> * http://struts.apache.org/1.2.9/
> We could start creating the versioned folders upfront and then redirecting from struts/1.2 to struts/1.2.9, and so forth.
> If we want to do that, then we should setup physical folders for 1.3.5  and 2.0.0 and setup the appropriate redirects for struts/1.3 and struts/2.0 to the latest versions. Then once each version rolls, we could create the 1.3.6 and 2.0.1 folders and update the redirects.
> In this way, people could link to Struts/1.3 or Struts/2.0 and be directed to the site for the latest working milestone in the each minor series. We could also create redirects for Struts/1.x and Struts/2.x to link to the lastest GA milestoren for each major release series. 
> One issue to consider is what do we do if a version does not go GA. If we had been doing this all along, then we would have created a website folder for 1.3.1. Would we have kept 1.3.1 around once we decided it was a permanent Alpha, or do we delete folders for versions that we know are not going GA?
> If we are careful to constrain the references to a specific version of the website, it would be possible to remove "beta" release sites, so that we only retain  the GA sites over time.
> For background see: 
> * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg23359.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.