You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/01 00:43:29 UTC
Re: WicketStuff artifacts naming strategy
Hell, it has been merged.
pull request #42 merged to master.
I've updated the wiki already asking for new JAR modules to follow this
naming strategy.
Thank you all for the support.
*Bruno Borges*
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The Pull request #42 is ready to be merged.
>
> Please review and vote.
>
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42
>
> There's one modification I made that is not related to the repository. It
> is here:
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42/files#r55594
>
>
>
> *Bruno Borges*
> www.brunoborges.com.br
> +55 21 76727099
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Clint Checketts <ch...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I seem to recall the Maven guys recommending against periods in
>> artifactIds.
>> Can't find the link for the info though... maybe it was just soething they
>> mentioned in the class.
>>
>> The purpose was to reduce confusion between artifactIds and groupIds.
>>
>> -Clint
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > i think the groupid/artifactid do matter because some containers have
>> > bundle deployers that pull things from the maven repo...i think
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > The Maven artifact id is not important.
>> > > The name of the produced .jar is what matters, right ?
>> > >
>> > > Harald just said that there is a convention in OSGi world to work with
>> > > such named .jars (com.acme.blah)
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:31 PM, James Carman
>> > > <jc...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>> > >> And repetitive
>> > >>
>> > >> Sent from my Android device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
>> > >> On Jun 30, 2011 11:12 AM, "Bruno Borges" <br...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>> Yes, me neither. That's why I asked.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The preffix I'm using is "wicketstuff-", but Harald mentioned
>> > >>> "org.wicketstuff."
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I don't want to use that, it's too verbose.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> *Bruno Borges*
>> > >>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>> > >>> +55 21 76727099
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, James Carman
>> > >>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the
>> > >>>> artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse
>> domain).
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <
>> > bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.'
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > Is this ok?
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > *Bruno Borges*
>> > >>>> > www.brunoborges.com.br
>> > >>>> > +55 21 76727099
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann <
>> > >> harald.wellmann@gmx.de
>> > >>>> >wrote:
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention to
>> > have
>> > >>>> >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >> groupId: org.wicketstuff
>> > >>>> >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>> > >>>> >> version: 1.5
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>> > >>>> >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention, while
>> > Apache
>> > >>>> >> Commons sticks with the old names.
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in
>> parallel
>> > >> would
>> > >>>> >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs.
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts, once
>> > you
>> > >>>> osgify
>> > >>>> >> them.
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >> Regards,
>> > >>>> >> Harald
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>>
>> >
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> > >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<
>> > >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
>> > >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >>
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Martin Grigorov
>> > > jWeekend
>> > > Training, Consulting, Development
>> > > http://jWeekend.com
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: WicketStuff artifacts naming strategy
Posted by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com>.
Correct, I don't think it would be nice to rename artifacts for 1.4 branch.
There's just too many people relying on old names.
What do others think?
On 2011 7 6 11:29, "Martin Grigorov" <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> The improvement in the naming was done only for 1.5 branch of
> wicketstuff/core and will be available with the next release (RC6 ?!).
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:13 PM, gilbertoca <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Bruno!
>>
>> I'm with the same problem:
>>
>>
>>> gilberto@SUGEP-DMASI:~/dev/netbeans-config/snp$ ll
>>> target/snp-1.1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/|grep jasper
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 gilberto users 23955 2011-07-04 11:31
>>> jasperreports-1.4.17.2.jar
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 gilberto users 2525996 2011-07-04 11:12
>>> jasperreports-3.5.3.jar
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Other thing, the jasperreports(wicketstuff) is tied to jasperreports
3.5.3
>> as you see above - I can't use another version, even using the maven
>> exclusion tag.
>>
>> We are using:
>> wicket version 1.4.17
>> wicketstuff version 1.4.17.2
>>
>> Where can I get this artefact (wicketstuff-jasperreports) for 1.4
version?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gilberto Caetano de Andrade
>> Analista de Sistemas/DBA
>> www.secad.to.gov.br
>> blog.gilbertoca.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Bruno Borges wrote:
>>>
>>> Hell, it has been merged.
>>>
>>> pull request #42 merged to master.
>>>
>>> I've updated the wiki already asking for new JAR modules to follow this
>>> naming strategy.
>>>
>>> Thank you all for the support.
>>>
>>> *Bruno Borges*
>>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>>> +55 21 76727099
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Bruno Borges
>>> <bruno.borges@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Pull request #42 is ready to be merged.
>>>>
>>>> Please review and vote.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42
>>>>
>>>> There's one modification I made that is not related to the repository.
It
>>>> is here:
>>>> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42/files#r55594
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Bruno Borges*
>>>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>>>> +55 21 76727099
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Clint Checketts
>>>> <checketts@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I seem to recall the Maven guys recommending against periods in
>>>>> artifactIds.
>>>>> Can't find the link for the info though... maybe it was just soething
>>>>> they
>>>>> mentioned in the class.
>>>>>
>>>>> The purpose was to reduce confusion between artifactIds and groupIds.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Clint
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg
>>>>> <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
>>> >> >wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > i think the groupid/artifactid do matter because some containers
have
>>>>> > bundle deployers that pull things from the maven repo...i think
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -igor
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Martin Grigorov
>>>>> <mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> > > The Maven artifact id is not important.
>>>>> > > The name of the produced .jar is what matters, right ?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Harald just said that there is a convention in OSGi world to work
>>>>> with
>>>>> > > such named .jars (com.acme.blah)
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:31 PM, James Carman
>>>>> > > <jcarman@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>> > >> And repetitive
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Sent from my Android device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
>>>>> > >> On Jun 30, 2011 11:12 AM, "Bruno Borges"
>>>>> <bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> > >>> Yes, me neither. That's why I asked.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> The preffix I'm using is "wicketstuff-", but Harald mentioned
>>>>> > >>> "org.wicketstuff."
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> I don't want to use that, it's too verbose.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> *Bruno Borges*
>>>>> > >>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>>>>> > >>> +55 21 76727099
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, James Carman
>>>>> > >>> <james@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>> I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the
>>>>> > >>>> artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse
>>>>> domain).
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <
>>>>> > bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>> > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.'
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>> > Is this ok?
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>> > *Bruno Borges*
>>>>> > >>>> > www.brunoborges.com.br
>>>>> > >>>> > +55 21 76727099
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann <
>>>>> > >> harald.wellmann@gmx.de
>>>>> > >>>> >wrote:
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>> >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention
>>>>> to
>>>>> > have
>>>>> > >>>> >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >> groupId: org.wicketstuff
>>>>> > >>>> >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>>>>> > >>>> >> version: 1.5
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>>>>> > >>>> >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention,
while
>>>>> > Apache
>>>>> > >>>> >> Commons sticks with the old names.
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in
>>>>> parallel
>>>>> > >> would
>>>>> > >>>> >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs.
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts,
>>>>> once
>>>>> > you
>>>>> > >>>> osgify
>>>>> > >>>> >> them.
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >> Regards,
>>>>> > >>>> >> Harald
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>>>> > >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**
apache.org<
>>>>> > >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
>>>>> > >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>>> > >>>> >
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > --
>>>>> > > Martin Grigorov
>>>>> > > jWeekend
>>>>> > > Training, Consulting, Development
>>>>> > > http://jWeekend.com
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketStuff-artifacts-naming-strategy-tp3404104p3648925.html
>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
Re: WicketStuff artifacts naming strategy
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
The improvement in the naming was done only for 1.5 branch of
wicketstuff/core and will be available with the next release (RC6 ?!).
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:13 PM, gilbertoca <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Bruno!
>
> I'm with the same problem:
>
>
>> gilberto@SUGEP-DMASI:~/dev/netbeans-config/snp$ ll
>> target/snp-1.1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/|grep jasper
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 gilberto users 23955 2011-07-04 11:31
>> jasperreports-1.4.17.2.jar
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 gilberto users 2525996 2011-07-04 11:12
>> jasperreports-3.5.3.jar
>>
>>
>
> Other thing, the jasperreports(wicketstuff) is tied to jasperreports 3.5.3
> as you see above - I can't use another version, even using the maven
> exclusion tag.
>
> We are using:
> wicket version 1.4.17
> wicketstuff version 1.4.17.2
>
> Where can I get this artefact (wicketstuff-jasperreports) for 1.4 version?
>
> Regards,
>
> Gilberto Caetano de Andrade
> Analista de Sistemas/DBA
> www.secad.to.gov.br
> blog.gilbertoca.com
>
>
>
> Bruno Borges wrote:
>>
>> Hell, it has been merged.
>>
>> pull request #42 merged to master.
>>
>> I've updated the wiki already asking for new JAR modules to follow this
>> naming strategy.
>>
>> Thank you all for the support.
>>
>> *Bruno Borges*
>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>> +55 21 76727099
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Bruno Borges
>> <bruno.borges@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> The Pull request #42 is ready to be merged.
>>>
>>> Please review and vote.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42
>>>
>>> There's one modification I made that is not related to the repository. It
>>> is here:
>>> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42/files#r55594
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Bruno Borges*
>>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>>> +55 21 76727099
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Clint Checketts
>>> <checketts@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I seem to recall the Maven guys recommending against periods in
>>>> artifactIds.
>>>> Can't find the link for the info though... maybe it was just soething
>>>> they
>>>> mentioned in the class.
>>>>
>>>> The purpose was to reduce confusion between artifactIds and groupIds.
>>>>
>>>> -Clint
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg
>>>> <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > i think the groupid/artifactid do matter because some containers have
>>>> > bundle deployers that pull things from the maven repo...i think
>>>> >
>>>> > -igor
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Martin Grigorov
>>>> <mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > > The Maven artifact id is not important.
>>>> > > The name of the produced .jar is what matters, right ?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Harald just said that there is a convention in OSGi world to work
>>>> with
>>>> > > such named .jars (com.acme.blah)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:31 PM, James Carman
>>>> > > <jcarman@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> And repetitive
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Sent from my Android device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
>>>> > >> On Jun 30, 2011 11:12 AM, "Bruno Borges"
>>>> <bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>> Yes, me neither. That's why I asked.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> The preffix I'm using is "wicketstuff-", but Harald mentioned
>>>> > >>> "org.wicketstuff."
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> I don't want to use that, it's too verbose.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *Bruno Borges*
>>>> > >>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>>>> > >>> +55 21 76727099
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, James Carman
>>>> > >>> <james@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>> I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the
>>>> > >>>> artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse
>>>> domain).
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <
>>>> > bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>> > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.'
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>> > Is this ok?
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>> > *Bruno Borges*
>>>> > >>>> > www.brunoborges.com.br
>>>> > >>>> > +55 21 76727099
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann <
>>>> > >> harald.wellmann@gmx.de
>>>> > >>>> >wrote:
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>> >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention
>>>> to
>>>> > have
>>>> > >>>> >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >> groupId: org.wicketstuff
>>>> > >>>> >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>>>> > >>>> >> version: 1.5
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>>>> > >>>> >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention, while
>>>> > Apache
>>>> > >>>> >> Commons sticks with the old names.
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in
>>>> parallel
>>>> > >> would
>>>> > >>>> >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs.
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts,
>>>> once
>>>> > you
>>>> > >>>> osgify
>>>> > >>>> >> them.
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >> Regards,
>>>> > >>>> >> Harald
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>>> > >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<
>>>> > >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
>>>> > >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >>
>>>> > >>>> >
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Martin Grigorov
>>>> > > jWeekend
>>>> > > Training, Consulting, Development
>>>> > > http://jWeekend.com
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketStuff-artifacts-naming-strategy-tp3404104p3648925.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketStuff artifacts naming strategy
Posted by gilbertoca <gi...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Bruno!
I'm with the same problem:
> gilberto@SUGEP-DMASI:~/dev/netbeans-config/snp$ ll
> target/snp-1.1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/|grep jasper
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gilberto users 23955 2011-07-04 11:31
> jasperreports-1.4.17.2.jar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gilberto users 2525996 2011-07-04 11:12
> jasperreports-3.5.3.jar
>
>
Other thing, the jasperreports(wicketstuff) is tied to jasperreports 3.5.3
as you see above - I can't use another version, even using the maven
exclusion tag.
We are using:
wicket version 1.4.17
wicketstuff version 1.4.17.2
Where can I get this artefact (wicketstuff-jasperreports) for 1.4 version?
Regards,
Gilberto Caetano de Andrade
Analista de Sistemas/DBA
www.secad.to.gov.br
blog.gilbertoca.com
Bruno Borges wrote:
>
> Hell, it has been merged.
>
> pull request #42 merged to master.
>
> I've updated the wiki already asking for new JAR modules to follow this
> naming strategy.
>
> Thank you all for the support.
>
> *Bruno Borges*
> www.brunoborges.com.br
> +55 21 76727099
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Bruno Borges
> <bruno.borges@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The Pull request #42 is ready to be merged.
>>
>> Please review and vote.
>>
>> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42
>>
>> There's one modification I made that is not related to the repository. It
>> is here:
>> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/42/files#r55594
>>
>>
>>
>> *Bruno Borges*
>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>> +55 21 76727099
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Clint Checketts
>> <checketts@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I seem to recall the Maven guys recommending against periods in
>>> artifactIds.
>>> Can't find the link for the info though... maybe it was just soething
>>> they
>>> mentioned in the class.
>>>
>>> The purpose was to reduce confusion between artifactIds and groupIds.
>>>
>>> -Clint
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg
>>> <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > i think the groupid/artifactid do matter because some containers have
>>> > bundle deployers that pull things from the maven repo...i think
>>> >
>>> > -igor
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Martin Grigorov
>>> <mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > The Maven artifact id is not important.
>>> > > The name of the produced .jar is what matters, right ?
>>> > >
>>> > > Harald just said that there is a convention in OSGi world to work
>>> with
>>> > > such named .jars (com.acme.blah)
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:31 PM, James Carman
>>> > > <jcarman@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> > >> And repetitive
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Sent from my Android device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
>>> > >> On Jun 30, 2011 11:12 AM, "Bruno Borges"
>>> <bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>> Yes, me neither. That's why I asked.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The preffix I'm using is "wicketstuff-", but Harald mentioned
>>> > >>> "org.wicketstuff."
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I don't want to use that, it's too verbose.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *Bruno Borges*
>>> > >>> www.brunoborges.com.br
>>> > >>> +55 21 76727099
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, James Carman
>>> > >>> <james@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the
>>> > >>>> artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse
>>> domain).
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <
>>> > bruno.borges@gmail.com>
>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>> > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.'
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>> > Is this ok?
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>> > *Bruno Borges*
>>> > >>>> > www.brunoborges.com.br
>>> > >>>> > +55 21 76727099
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann <
>>> > >> harald.wellmann@gmx.de
>>> > >>>> >wrote:
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>> >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention
>>> to
>>> > have
>>> > >>>> >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >> groupId: org.wicketstuff
>>> > >>>> >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>>> > >>>> >> version: 1.5
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar
>>> > >>>> >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention, while
>>> > Apache
>>> > >>>> >> Commons sticks with the old names.
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in
>>> parallel
>>> > >> would
>>> > >>>> >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs.
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts,
>>> once
>>> > you
>>> > >>>> osgify
>>> > >>>> >> them.
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >> Regards,
>>> > >>>> >> Harald
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>>
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>> > >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<
>>> > >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
>>> > >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >>
>>> > >>>> >
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Martin Grigorov
>>> > > jWeekend
>>> > > Training, Consulting, Development
>>> > > http://jWeekend.com
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketStuff-artifacts-naming-strategy-tp3404104p3648925.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org