You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@reef.apache.org by "Markus Weimer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/10 10:53:05 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (REEF-827) Standardize Java object field access
in InterOp layer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/REEF-827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951728#comment-14951728 ]
Markus Weimer commented on REEF-827:
------------------------------------
+1 on using only {{public}} methods to access fields. Direct access to {{private}} members is very risky, as it messes with IDE (and human) assumptions about what can and cannot be refactored.
Shall we update our coding guide with a section on the bridge and that recommendation as a first step?
> Standardize Java object field access in InterOp layer
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: REEF-827
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/REEF-827
> Project: REEF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: REEF Bridge
> Reporter: Andrew Chung
>
> Currently, C++ InterOp code can access a field in a Java object either directly (even if it's {{private}}) with {{GetObjectField()}} or through the (often) {{public}} getter method {{GetMethodId}}. Our code uses a combination of both. We should standardize such that it uses either-or, not both.
> Personally, I prefer {{GetMethodId}} as a standard instead of {{GetObjectField}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)