Flex

[Swix Company <sw...@gmail.com>]

Hi There,

I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go a
long way of helping develop RIA.
I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea.

-- 
*Nene Odonkor*
*CEO & Senior Creative Director**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Inspire. Design. Create.*
*

Like us on *Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/amswix*

Re: Flex

[Peter Elst <pe...@gmail.com>]

I'm assuming this is similar to the common feature request of the display
list being exposed into the browser DOM - its more something for the Flash
Player level and don't think its very feasible (would be great though).

A possible approach is writing a jQuery plugin that takes advantage of
ExternalInterface and a corresponding ActionScript utility that does
the marshaling. Its all a bit hacky though and not sure what the advantage
is over just using ExternalInterface if there's no low level support for
it.


- Peter


On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>wrote:

> Again: I am not sure what you are all talking about :) ExternalInterface
> works fine for certain tasks.
>
> What do you want to do ?!
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
>
> On 05/04/2012 23:44, Bradley Slavik wrote:
>
>> I cannot imagine how this would work. Also, the syntax of jQuery is
>> inconsistent. If there
>> were any effort in this direction I would help with MooTools which is a
>> more consistent,
>> better written, if lesser known Javascript extension.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Alain Ekambi<jazzmatadazz@**
>> googlemail.com <ja...@googlemail.com>>wrote:
>>
>>  Native Flex (AS3/MXML) integration with JS has never been easy (External
>>> Interface is a big pain).
>>> This is one of the reasons we went the GWT way with Flex since it gave us
>>> esay JS Integration with Flex.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/4/5 Martin Heidegger<mh...@leichtgewicht.at>
>>>
>>>  I'd love to hear more about what approach you would suggest.
>>>>
>>>> yours
>>>> Marttin.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/04/2012 22:04, Swix Company wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi There,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go
>>>>>
>>>> a
>>>
>>>> long way of helping develop RIA.
>>>>> I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Re: Flex

[Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>]

Again: I am not sure what you are all talking about :) ExternalInterface 
works fine for certain tasks.

What do you want to do ?!

yours
Martin.

On 05/04/2012 23:44, Bradley Slavik wrote:
> I cannot imagine how this would work. Also, the syntax of jQuery is
> inconsistent. If there
> were any effort in this direction I would help with MooTools which is a
> more consistent,
> better written, if lesser known Javascript extension.
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Alain Ekambi<ja...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Native Flex (AS3/MXML) integration with JS has never been easy (External
>> Interface is a big pain).
>> This is one of the reasons we went the GWT way with Flex since it gave us
>> esay JS Integration with Flex.
>>
>>
>> 2012/4/5 Martin Heidegger<mh...@leichtgewicht.at>
>>
>>> I'd love to hear more about what approach you would suggest.
>>>
>>> yours
>>> Marttin.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2012 22:04, Swix Company wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi There,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go
>> a
>>>> long way of helping develop RIA.
>>>> I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea.
>>>>
>>>>

Re: Flex

[Bradley Slavik <br...@gmail.com>]

I cannot imagine how this would work. Also, the syntax of jQuery is
inconsistent. If there
were any effort in this direction I would help with MooTools which is a
more consistent,
better written, if lesser known Javascript extension.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Alain Ekambi <ja...@googlemail.com>wrote:

> Native Flex (AS3/MXML) integration with JS has never been easy (External
> Interface is a big pain).
> This is one of the reasons we went the GWT way with Flex since it gave us
> esay JS Integration with Flex.
>
>
> 2012/4/5 Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>
>
> > I'd love to hear more about what approach you would suggest.
> >
> > yours
> > Marttin.
> >
> >
> > On 05/04/2012 22:04, Swix Company wrote:
> >
> >> Hi There,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go
> a
> >> long way of helping develop RIA.
> >> I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea.
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: Flex

[Alain Ekambi <ja...@googlemail.com>]

Native Flex (AS3/MXML) integration with JS has never been easy (External
Interface is a big pain).
This is one of the reasons we went the GWT way with Flex since it gave us
esay JS Integration with Flex.


2012/4/5 Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>

> I'd love to hear more about what approach you would suggest.
>
> yours
> Marttin.
>
>
> On 05/04/2012 22:04, Swix Company wrote:
>
>> Hi There,
>>
>> I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go a
>> long way of helping develop RIA.
>> I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea.
>>
>>
>

Re: Flex

[Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>]

I'd love to hear more about what approach you would suggest.

yours
Marttin.

On 05/04/2012 22:04, Swix Company wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go a
> long way of helping develop RIA.
> I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea.
>