You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wink.apache.org by Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com> on 2009/07/01 10:57:04 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
We're compliant! :)
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Dims/Kevan,
>
> Thanks, so we'll wait for those that have access to the TCK to continue to
> open JIRAs and notify us when we're compliant.
>
>
> -Nick
>
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> [image: Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>]
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> *Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>*
>
> 06/29/2009 08:30 AM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
>
> Nick,
>
> No, it's not ok to disclose the # of failures.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
>
> On 06/29/2009 08:48 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> > Is it alright to disclose the result in a general way? As in, there are
> 32
> > total failures for 500 tests?
> >
> > If so, can you give us a sense for where we are Michael?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Nick
> >
> >
> >
> > Nicholas Gallardo
> > WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development
> > nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> > Phone: 512-286-6258
> > Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael Elman
> > <tarlog@gmail.com
> > >
> To
> > wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > 06/28/2009 11:52
> cc
> > PM
> >
> Subject
> > Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
> > Please respond to
> > wink-dev@incubato
> > r.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Kevan,
> >
> > It's my fault. I thought it's ok to post the test names, but now I read
> the
> > NDA again and it seems that you are absolutely right and nothing
> regarding
> > the TCK should be exposed publicly.
> > I'll edit the JIRA now to ensure it doesn't appear anymore, but it was
> > already sent to the mailing list... Ouch :(
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Kevan Miller
> > <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >> There needs to be a discussion about how TCK information is discussed on
> >> this mailing list. I haven't looked at the JAX-RS TCK. However, If you
> > are
> >> accessing the TCK via Apache's agreement with Sun, you submitted the
> >> following NDA to Apache: http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf Most
> >> projects treat this as restricting their ability to explicitly specifics
> >> about the TCK tests (e.g. test names, functions tested, etc). Perhaps
> the
> >> JAX-RS TCK is available publicly, not under different terms? There is
> > some
> >> debate about how closed projects need to be about TCK results.
> >>
> >> FYI, here's information about Apache and the JCP (including TCK
> testing):
> >> http://www.apache.org/jcp/
> >>
> >> --kevan
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
xcellent!!
-- dims
On 07/01/2009 04:57 AM, Michael Elman wrote:
> We're compliant! :)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo<nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>> Dims/Kevan,
>>
>> Thanks, so we'll wait for those that have access to the TCK to continue to
>> open JIRAs and notify us when we're compliant.
>>
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>]
>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>*
>>
>> 06/29/2009 08:30 AM
>> Please respond to
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>> To
>>
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>>
>> Subject
>>
>> Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
>>
>> Nick,
>>
>> No, it's not ok to disclose the # of failures.
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>>
>> On 06/29/2009 08:48 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>>> Is it alright to disclose the result in a general way? As in, there are
>> 32
>>> total failures for 500 tests?
>>>
>>> If so, can you give us a sense for where we are Michael?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nicholas Gallardo
>>> WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development
>>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Elman
>>> <tarlog@gmail.com
>>> >
>> To
>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> 06/28/2009 11:52
>> cc
>>> PM
>>>
>> Subject
>>> Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
>>> Please respond to
>>> wink-dev@incubato
>>> r.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Kevan,
>>>
>>> It's my fault. I thought it's ok to post the test names, but now I read
>> the
>>> NDA again and it seems that you are absolutely right and nothing
>> regarding
>>> the TCK should be exposed publicly.
>>> I'll edit the JIRA now to ensure it doesn't appear anymore, but it was
>>> already sent to the mailing list... Ouch :(
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Kevan Miller
>>> <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>> There needs to be a discussion about how TCK information is discussed on
>>>> this mailing list. I haven't looked at the JAX-RS TCK. However, If you
>>> are
>>>> accessing the TCK via Apache's agreement with Sun, you submitted the
>>>> following NDA to Apache: http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf Most
>>>> projects treat this as restricting their ability to explicitly specifics
>>>> about the TCK tests (e.g. test names, functions tested, etc). Perhaps
>> the
>>>> JAX-RS TCK is available publicly, not under different terms? There is
>>> some
>>>> debate about how closed projects need to be about TCK results.
>>>>
>>>> FYI, here's information about Apache and the JCP (including TCK
>> testing):
>>>> http://www.apache.org/jcp/
>>>>
>>>> --kevan
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
Coolness. Thanks Michael!
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Michael Elman<ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We're compliant! :)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>> Dims/Kevan,
>>
>> Thanks, so we'll wait for those that have access to the TCK to continue to
>> open JIRAs and notify us when we're compliant.
>>
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>]
>> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>*
>>
>> 06/29/2009 08:30 AM
>> Please respond to
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>> To
>>
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>>
>> Subject
>>
>> Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
>>
>> Nick,
>>
>> No, it's not ok to disclose the # of failures.
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>>
>> On 06/29/2009 08:48 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>> > Is it alright to disclose the result in a general way? As in, there are
>> 32
>> > total failures for 500 tests?
>> >
>> > If so, can you give us a sense for where we are Michael?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > -Nick
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Nicholas Gallardo
>> > WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development
>> > nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> > Phone: 512-286-6258
>> > Building: 903 / 5G-016
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael Elman
>> > <tarlog@gmail.com
>> > >
>> To
>> > wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > 06/28/2009 11:52
>> cc
>> > PM
>> >
>> Subject
>> > Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
>> > Please respond to
>> > wink-dev@incubato
>> > r.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Kevan,
>> >
>> > It's my fault. I thought it's ok to post the test names, but now I read
>> the
>> > NDA again and it seems that you are absolutely right and nothing
>> regarding
>> > the TCK should be exposed publicly.
>> > I'll edit the JIRA now to ensure it doesn't appear anymore, but it was
>> > already sent to the mailing list... Ouch :(
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Kevan Miller
>> > <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >> There needs to be a discussion about how TCK information is discussed on
>> >> this mailing list. I haven't looked at the JAX-RS TCK. However, If you
>> > are
>> >> accessing the TCK via Apache's agreement with Sun, you submitted the
>> >> following NDA to Apache: http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf Most
>> >> projects treat this as restricting their ability to explicitly specifics
>> >> about the TCK tests (e.g. test names, functions tested, etc). Perhaps
>> the
>> >> JAX-RS TCK is available publicly, not under different terms? There is
>> > some
>> >> debate about how closed projects need to be about TCK results.
>> >>
>> >> FYI, here's information about Apache and the JCP (including TCK
>> testing):
>> >> http://www.apache.org/jcp/
>> >>
>> >> --kevan
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
- Bryant Luk
Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
That's awesome!
Huge thanks Michael for getting that turned around in such short order.
-Nick
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
Michael Elman
<tarlog@gmail.com
> To
wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
07/01/2009 03:57 cc
AM
Subject
Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
Please respond to
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
We're compliant! :)
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Dims/Kevan,
>
> Thanks, so we'll wait for those that have access to the TCK to continue
to
> open JIRAs and notify us when we're compliant.
>
>
> -Nick
>
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> [image: Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>]
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> *Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>*
>
> 06/29/2009 08:30 AM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
>
> Nick,
>
> No, it's not ok to disclose the # of failures.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
>
> On 06/29/2009 08:48 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> > Is it alright to disclose the result in a general way? As in, there
are
> 32
> > total failures for 500 tests?
> >
> > If so, can you give us a sense for where we are Michael?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Nick
> >
> >
> >
> > Nicholas Gallardo
> > WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development
> > nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> > Phone: 512-286-6258
> > Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael Elman
> > <tarlog@gmail.com
> > >
> To
> > wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > 06/28/2009 11:52
> cc
> > PM
> >
> Subject
> > Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information
> > Please respond to
> > wink-dev@incubato
> > r.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Kevan,
> >
> > It's my fault. I thought it's ok to post the test names, but now I read
> the
> > NDA again and it seems that you are absolutely right and nothing
> regarding
> > the TCK should be exposed publicly.
> > I'll edit the JIRA now to ensure it doesn't appear anymore, but it was
> > already sent to the mailing list... Ouch :(
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Kevan Miller
> > <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >> There needs to be a discussion about how TCK information is discussed
on
> >> this mailing list. I haven't looked at the JAX-RS TCK. However, If you
> > are
> >> accessing the TCK via Apache's agreement with Sun, you submitted the
> >> following NDA to Apache: http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf Most
> >> projects treat this as restricting their ability to explicitly
specifics
> >> about the TCK tests (e.g. test names, functions tested, etc). Perhaps
> the
> >> JAX-RS TCK is available publicly, not under different terms? There is
> > some
> >> debate about how closed projects need to be about TCK results.
> >>
> >> FYI, here's information about Apache and the JCP (including TCK
> testing):
> >> http://www.apache.org/jcp/
> >>
> >> --kevan
> >>
> >
>
>