file download component for JSF

[ying lcs <yi...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Does MyFaces have a file download component for JSF?

Thank you.

Re: file download component for JSF

[yazid <sm...@yahoo.fr>]

Hi all;
Can any one tell me how to upload a file in memory with Tobago...
Thanks;

Scott O wrote:
> 
> Ying,
> 
> Tobago, Tomahawk, and Trinidad do.  But MyFaces itself does not at the 
> moment.  We're currently discussing that right now on the dev list being 
> that we've basically re-invented the wheel three times.  :)
> 
> Scott
> 
> ying lcs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does MyFaces have a file download component for JSF?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/file-download-component-for-JSF-tf2432466.html#a8004813
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: file download component for JSF

[Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com>]

Martin Marinschek wrote:
> And all component sets offer a file-upload, none (afaik) offers a
> file-download component.
> 

These seems bizarre to me. Why not file download? It is non-trivial IMO 
to create a download component with a progress bar, without running into 
OutputStreamExceptions.

Re: file download component for JSF

[Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>]

Tobago is another set of components.

And all component sets offer a file-upload, none (afaik) offers a
file-download component.

regards,

Martin

On 10/13/06, Aneesha Govil <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is what my understanding of the extensions is - Tomahawk is a
> collection of JSF components that extend the functionality of MyFaces. They
> can be added with Sun's RI of JSF as well. Tomahawk has a stable release.
>
>  Trinidad is the part that Oracle ADF donated to Apache. It has a rich set
> of components that offer a lot of functionality. This is still in the Apache
> incubator and is yet to be released by Apache.
>
> I am not sure what all Tobago offers, anyone please explain?
>
> Regards,
> Aneesha
>
>
> On 10/13/06, ying lcs <yi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks.
> > Can you please explains what is the relationship between Tobago,
> > Tomahawk, MyFaces and Trinidad.
> >
> > My understanding is  Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad are 'extension' of JSF
> > whereas MyFaces is a open source implementation of JSF.
> >
> > So why we have 3 extensions of JSF ' Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad '?
> > And if JSF spec does not defined a file download component, so it
> > makes sense that MyFaces itself does not have it. But why the dev list
> > is discussing to add it?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > On 10/12/06, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ying,
> > >
> > > Tobago, Tomahawk, and Trinidad do.  But MyFaces itself does not at the
> > > moment.  We're currently discussing that right now on the dev list being
> > > that we've basically re-invented the wheel three times.  :)
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > ying lcs wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Does MyFaces have a file download component for JSF?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: file download component for JSF

[Aneesha Govil <po...@gmail.com>]

Here is what my understanding of the extensions is - Tomahawk is a
collection of JSF components that extend the functionality of MyFaces. They
can be added with Sun's RI of JSF as well. Tomahawk has a stable release.

Trinidad is the part that Oracle ADF donated to Apache. It has a rich set of
components that offer a lot of functionality. This is still in the Apache
incubator and is yet to be released by Apache.

I am not sure what all Tobago offers, anyone please explain?

Regards,
Aneesha

On 10/13/06, ying lcs <yi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks.
> Can you please explains what is the relationship between Tobago,
> Tomahawk, MyFaces and Trinidad.
>
> My understanding is  Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad are 'extension' of JSF
> whereas MyFaces is a open source implementation of JSF.
>
> So why we have 3 extensions of JSF ' Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad '?
> And if JSF spec does not defined a file download component, so it
> makes sense that MyFaces itself does not have it. But why the dev list
> is discussing to add it?
>
> Thank you.
>
> On 10/12/06, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ying,
> >
> > Tobago, Tomahawk, and Trinidad do.  But MyFaces itself does not at the
> > moment.  We're currently discussing that right now on the dev list being
> > that we've basically re-invented the wheel three times.  :)
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > ying lcs wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Does MyFaces have a file download component for JSF?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: file download component for JSF

[ying lcs <yi...@gmail.com>]

Thanks.
Can you please explains what is the relationship between Tobago,
Tomahawk, MyFaces and Trinidad.

My understanding is  Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad are 'extension' of JSF
whereas MyFaces is a open source implementation of JSF.

So why we have 3 extensions of JSF ' Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad '?
And if JSF spec does not defined a file download component, so it
makes sense that MyFaces itself does not have it. But why the dev list
is discussing to add it?

Thank you.

On 10/12/06, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ying,
>
> Tobago, Tomahawk, and Trinidad do.  But MyFaces itself does not at the
> moment.  We're currently discussing that right now on the dev list being
> that we've basically re-invented the wheel three times.  :)
>
> Scott
>
> ying lcs wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does MyFaces have a file download component for JSF?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
>
>

Re: file download component for JSF

[Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>]

Ying,

Tobago, Tomahawk, and Trinidad do.  But MyFaces itself does not at the 
moment.  We're currently discussing that right now on the dev list being 
that we've basically re-invented the wheel three times.  :)

Scott

ying lcs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does MyFaces have a file download component for JSF?
>
> Thank you.
>