You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stdcxx.apache.org by Martin Sebor <ms...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/28 18:12:12 UTC
problems with new list tests
I've been working on cleaning up our test results across the board
with the hope of stabilizing things enough to cut a preliminary 4.2
[pre]release branch sometime soon. Last night's results contain
a number of new failures on several platforms introduced by the
just committed list tests. I'd like to clean these up before we
move on. I put together a high-level overview to help us focus on
the problem platforms. Farid, please look at the results to see if
something obvious jumps out at you. Once you're done with the
changes on your platforms I'll get to work on the rest.
IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful
HP aCC/IPF all tests die with SIGABRT
HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS
SGI MIPSpro OK
gcc/Linux OK
Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT
MSVC/Windows OK
Compaq C++/Tru64 all tests fail to compile or link
The full results are on the usual page:
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/
Thanks
Martin
Re: problems with new list tests
Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>>>> IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful
>>>> HP aCC/IPF all tests die with SIGABRT
>>>> HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS
>>>> SGI MIPSpro OK
>>>> gcc/Linux OK
>>>> Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT
>>>> MSVC/Windows OK
>>>> Compaq C++/Tru64 all tests fail to compile or link
>>>>
>>> Four tests failed to compile due to static inline issue.
>>> Fixed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523397
>> Great! Can you think of a reason for any of the other failures?
>> if not off the top of your head, do you want to look into it
>> or should I go ahead?
>
> The problem on Compaq C++/Tru64 is using size_t type when <cstddef>
> header included.
>
> I've fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523692
Great, thanks! On this note, if you haven't done it yet it
would be useful for you to install EDG eccp and test with it
(in addition to testing with the other compilers you use).
stdcxx enables its super-strict conformance mode when using
this compiler and detects these kinds of things. Contact me
off the list if you're interested (I recommend it ;-)
>
> I don't have any thoughts why the tests died with signal.
> Please go ahead to look into it.
Okay, I'll work on it.
Martin
RE: problems with new list tests
Posted by Farid Zaripov <Fa...@epam.com>.
> > > IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful
> > > HP aCC/IPF all tests die with SIGABRT
> > > HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS
> > > SGI MIPSpro OK
> > > gcc/Linux OK
> > > Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT
> > > MSVC/Windows OK
> > > Compaq C++/Tru64 all tests fail to compile or link
> > >
> >
> > Four tests failed to compile due to static inline issue.
> > Fixed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523397
>
> Great! Can you think of a reason for any of the other failures?
> if not off the top of your head, do you want to look into it
> or should I go ahead?
The problem on Compaq C++/Tru64 is using size_t type when <cstddef>
header included.
I've fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523692
I don't have any thoughts why the tests died with signal.
Please go ahead to look into it.
Farid.
RE: problems with new list tests
Posted by Martin Sebor <ms...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 19:33 +0300, Farid Zaripov wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:12 PM
> > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: problems with new list tests
> >
> > I've been working on cleaning up our test results across the
> > board with the hope of stabilizing things enough to cut a
> > preliminary 4.2 [pre]release branch sometime soon. Last
> > night's results contain a number of new failures on several
> > platforms introduced by the just committed list tests. I'd
> > like to clean these up before we move on. I put together a
> > high-level overview to help us focus on the problem
> > platforms. Farid, please look at the results to see if
> > something obvious jumps out at you. Once you're done with the
> > changes on your platforms I'll get to work on the rest.
> >
> > IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful
> > HP aCC/IPF all tests die with SIGABRT
> > HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS
> > SGI MIPSpro OK
> > gcc/Linux OK
> > Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT
> > MSVC/Windows OK
> > Compaq C++/Tru64 all tests fail to compile or link
> >
>
> Four tests failed to compile due to static inline issue.
> Fixed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523397
Great! Can you think of a reason for any of the other failures?
if not off the top of your head, do you want to look into it or
should I go ahead?
Martin
RE: problems with new list tests
Posted by Farid Zaripov <Fa...@epam.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:12 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: problems with new list tests
>
> I've been working on cleaning up our test results across the
> board with the hope of stabilizing things enough to cut a
> preliminary 4.2 [pre]release branch sometime soon. Last
> night's results contain a number of new failures on several
> platforms introduced by the just committed list tests. I'd
> like to clean these up before we move on. I put together a
> high-level overview to help us focus on the problem
> platforms. Farid, please look at the results to see if
> something obvious jumps out at you. Once you're done with the
> changes on your platforms I'll get to work on the rest.
>
> IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful
> HP aCC/IPF all tests die with SIGABRT
> HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS
> SGI MIPSpro OK
> gcc/Linux OK
> Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT
> MSVC/Windows OK
> Compaq C++/Tru64 all tests fail to compile or link
>
Four tests failed to compile due to static inline issue.
Fixed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523397
Farid.