You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/21 14:31:16 UTC
Servicemix strategy concerning GigaSpaces/Terracotta/Tangosol
Hi,
What are the plans of servicemix architecture's team about the its
integration with Java spaces community like (GigaSpaces, Terracotta,
Tangosol, Gemstone, ...) as this is done with Mule ESB
(http://www.gigaspaces.com/wiki/display/GS/Gigaspaces-Mule+Integration+Package)
?
Regards,
Charles
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Servicemix-strategy-concerning-GigaSpaces-Terracotta-Tangosol-tp16807494p16807494.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Servicemix strategy concerning GigaSpaces/Terracotta/Tangosol
Posted by cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Bruce,
Many thanks for your reply. BTW, I see that someone has developed a small
project to integrate camel endpoint with Terracotta
(http://www.nabble.com/Working-Terracotta-Component---Clustered-Queues-in-Camel-td15941549s22882.html).
This project could be helpful for someone interesting to create a JBI
endpoint between servicemix and terracotta.
My feeling concerning the computer-grid or data-grid sphere is that we
should consider this approach very carefully in the future to provide a ESB
solution where the clustering, transactions and stateful SOA are handled by
the java spaces and are not necessarily embedded by the ESB code. According
to this kind of architecture, the development work can be split between 2
roles :
- Enterprise Architect : developer in charge to define services/endpoints,
select EIP patterns, integrate POJO code
- Administrator : define best clustering, load balancing and/or transaction
strategy
The combination of both frameworks could potentially reduce development time
and specifically in financial or banking environment where they have
thousand and thousands messages to process and where a clustering
environment is defacto required. Using a java-space environment could also
reduce the config time/deployment required when the clustering solution is
only contemplated from a JMS (WebSphere MQ, SonicMQ, ...) point of view.
Regards,
Charles
Senior Enterprise Architect
Xpectis (www.xpectis.com)
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:31 AM, cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What are the plans of servicemix architecture's team about the its
>> integration with Java spaces community like (GigaSpaces, Terracotta,
>> Tangosol, Gemstone, ...) as this is done with Mule ESB
>>
>> (http://www.gigaspaces.com/wiki/display/GS/Gigaspaces-Mule+Integration+Package)
>> ?
>
> We can certainly offer integrations with those software packages in
> some way, but there just hasn't been any demand for them yet. We'd
> also need to take a look at the license on each one to determine how
> it needs to be handled WRT to the Apache License 2.0.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Servicemix-strategy-concerning-GigaSpaces-Terracotta-Tangosol-tp16807494p16823107.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Servicemix strategy concerning GigaSpaces/Terracotta/Tangosol
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:31 AM, cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What are the plans of servicemix architecture's team about the its
> integration with Java spaces community like (GigaSpaces, Terracotta,
> Tangosol, Gemstone, ...) as this is done with Mule ESB
> (http://www.gigaspaces.com/wiki/display/GS/Gigaspaces-Mule+Integration+Package)
> ?
We can certainly offer integrations with those software packages in
some way, but there just hasn't been any demand for them yet. We'd
also need to take a look at the license on each one to determine how
it needs to be handled WRT to the Apache License 2.0.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/