Code coverage for 10.1.1.0 candidate

[Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@yngvi.org>]

Hi,

I ran code coverage for 10.1.1.0 candidate and the results are as following:

EMMA Coverage Report (generated Fri Jun 24 17:56:25 PDT 2005)

OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
Class % ---------- 89%  (1062/1188)
Method % ------- 73%  (14688/20201)
Block % --------- 69%  (440815/640728)

OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
total packages: 76
total executable files: 1133
total classes: 1188
total methods: 20201

Note: The line coverage could not be generated because some of the files 
were compiled without debug info.

Thanks,
Raman

Re: Code coverage for 10.1.1.0 candidate

[Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>]

Ramandeep Kaur wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I ran code coverage for 10.1.1.0 candidate and the results are as
> following:
> 
> EMMA Coverage Report (generated Fri Jun 24 17:56:25 PDT 2005)
> 
> OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
> Class % ---------- 89%  (1062/1188)
> Method % ------- 73%  (14688/20201)
> Block % --------- 69%  (440815/640728)

Thanks for the numbers, Raman.

Just to compare Raman's numbers from 2005/4/27 were

Class %  90% (1057/1172)
Method   73% (14464/19856)
Block    69% (431895/629256)

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200504.mbox/%3c426FC866.30401@yngvi.org%3e

Mostly steady, though it seems 16 new classes were added and only 5 get
tested using tests in derbyall. Hopefully Raman can start mailing the
details of the coverage available so we could see which new classes were
not tested etc. And of course the details we allow us to get to a state
where we can trust the results, and ensure that all classes in the
report are part of the released jars and only classes in the released
jars are included. At least that's my interest in code coverage numbers,
others may be interested in other aspects.

Dan.