You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2016/08/02 10:18:59 UTC
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/greenqloud/cloudstack pr-template-bits
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1622
----
commit a74766e8671227bd0a5fb0c3283571e8ee1d9f46
Author: Pall Helgason <pa...@greenqloud.com>
Date: 2016-03-03T13:32:24Z
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
----
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
LGTM, Travis/Jenkins failure is not caused by this. Validated build, and Trillian tests. Merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by koushik-das <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622#discussion_r76588913
--- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/TemplateResponse.java ---
@@ -169,6 +169,10 @@
@Param(description = "additional key/value details tied with template")
private Map details;
+ @SerializedName(ApiConstants.BITS)
+ @Param(description="the processor bit size")
--- End diff --
Please add "since" in Param
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Thanks @ProjectMoon
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2714centos7 \u2714debian. JID-76
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
This has been rebased to the latest master, and the code review suggestions applied.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by jburwell <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon Travis is now passing, but Jenkins failed. Could you please investigate the failure and fix it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Will check it out on Monday. Very weird that the end of the build is not an error specifically. Just "ending due to build failure" or some such.
The first exception I see is:
```
2016-08-05 17:25:38,700 ERROR [network.guru.NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuru] (main:) Unable to store logical switch id in broadcast uri, uuid = c63b0770-2e6c-4189-8c99-9f9a764f2cf1
java.net.URISyntaxException: Expected scheme-specific part at index 8: lswitch:
at java.net.URI$Parser.fail(URI.java:2848)
at java.net.URI$Parser.failExpecting(URI.java:2854)
at java.net.URI$Parser.parse(URI.java:3057)
at java.net.URI.<init>(URI.java:820)
at com.cloud.network.guru.NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuru.implement(NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuru.java:235)
at com.cloud.network.guru.NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuruTest.testImplementURIException(NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuruTest.java:410)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
````
Is that relevant?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2714centos7 \u2714debian repo: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Thanks @ProjectMoon
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Will check the smoke tests for Marvin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by jburwell <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon is there a JIRA associated with this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon can you add a JIRA id for this, also in the commit's summary
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@blueorangutan kick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by jburwell <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622#discussion_r73605500
--- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/TemplateResponse.java ---
@@ -169,6 +169,10 @@
@Param(description = "additional key/value details tied with template")
private Map details;
+ @SerializedName(ApiConstants.BITS)
+ @Param(description="the processor bit size")
+ private int bits;
--- End diff --
Why is this value represented as a number and not an enumeration? It can't be any number other 32 and 64.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Rebased to latest master, though I still haven't checked into the Jenkins issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by ustcweizhou <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon is there any possible ui change for this? if yes, I suggest to commit it together with this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/greenqloud/cloudstack pr-template-bits
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1622
----
----
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
RPM packages built and available at: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/custom/github-1622.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by koushik-das <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622#discussion_r76589032
--- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/TemplateResponse.java ---
@@ -347,4 +351,11 @@ public String getZoneId() {
return zoneId;
}
+ public int getBits() {
--- End diff --
This is not needed, please remove.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/greenqloud/cloudstack pr-template-bits
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1622
----
commit 5974dad0aaea41deaa5d8f6dbc61c39e5532f258
Author: Pall Helgason <pa...@greenqloud.com>
Date: 2016-03-03T13:32:24Z
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
----
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
<b>Trillian test result (tid-545)</b>
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 29748 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1622-t545-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 48 look ok, 1 have error(s)
Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_06_download_detached_volume | `Error` | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 200.81 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.31 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 341.41 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 275.51 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 545.40 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 554.40 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1483.94 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 698.95 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 950.13 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1405.56 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.57 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.46 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.50 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.30 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.30 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.83 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 738.53 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 379.91 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 67.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 41.01 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 1.44 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 131.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 130.97 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 50.46 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 95.86 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.40 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.13 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 115.91 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.95 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 138.98 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 136.91 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 138.99 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 142.01 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 174.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 7.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.47 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 247.92 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 50.46 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 35.35 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.19 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.07 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.71 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 65.59 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.15 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.60 | test_routers.py
test_router_dns_guestipquery | Success | 76.94 | test_router_dns.py
test_router_dns_externalipquery | Success | 0.14 | test_router_dns.py
test_router_dhcphosts | Success | 287.18 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_router_dhcp_opts | Success | 21.84 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_01_updatevolumedetail | Success | 0.11 | test_resource_detail.py
test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Success | 201.60 | test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_createRegion | Success | 0.05 | test_regions.py
test_create_pvlan_network | Success | 5.30 | test_pvlan.py
test_dedicatePublicIpRange | Success | 0.52 | test_public_ip_range.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | Success | 531.47 | test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | Success | 634.58 | test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | Success | 423.25 | test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_privategw_acl | Success | 93.49 | test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_primary_storage_nfs | Success | 35.89 | test_primary_storage.py
test_createPortablePublicIPRange | Success | 15.21 | test_portable_publicip.py
test_createPortablePublicIPAcquire | Success | 15.56 | test_portable_publicip.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | Success | 90.14 | test_password_server.py
test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor | Success | 0.19 | test_over_provisioning.py
test_oobm_zchange_password | Success | 31.24 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_multiple_mgmt_server_ownership | Success | 16.41 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_issue_power_status | Success | 5.33 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_issue_power_soft | Success | 10.37 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_issue_power_reset | Success | 15.44 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_issue_power_on | Success | 15.38 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_issue_power_off | Success | 15.47 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_issue_power_cycle | Success | 15.39 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_enabledisable_across_clusterzones | Success | 93.02 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_enable_feature_valid | Success | 5.73 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_enable_feature_invalid | Success | 0.15 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_disable_feature_valid | Success | 5.22 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_disable_feature_invalid | Success | 0.12 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_configure_invalid_driver | Success | 0.11 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_configure_default_driver | Success | 0.11 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_oobm_background_powerstate_sync | Success | 29.52 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | Success | 15.34 | test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_01_nic | Success | 541.26 | test_nic.py
test_releaseIP | Success | 254.63 | test_network.py
test_reboot_router | Success | 505.89 | test_network.py
test_public_ip_user_account | Success | 10.29 | test_network.py
test_public_ip_admin_account | Success | 40.28 | test_network.py
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Success | 67.35 | test_network.py
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Success | 62.47 | test_network.py
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Success | 124.57 | test_network.py
test_delete_account | Success | 304.26 | test_network.py
test_02_port_fwd_on_non_src_nat | Success | 55.73 | test_network.py
test_01_port_fwd_on_src_nat | Success | 112.21 | test_network.py
test_nic_secondaryip_add_remove | Success | 213.80 | test_multipleips_per_nic.py
login_test_saml_user | Success | 24.97 | test_login.py
test_assign_and_removal_lb | Success | 134.59 | test_loadbalance.py
test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat | Success | 187.89 | test_loadbalance.py
test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat | Success | 229.30 | test_loadbalance.py
test_03_list_snapshots | Success | 0.08 | test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_02_list_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_01_list_volumes | Success | 0.03 | test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_07_list_default_iso | Success | 0.06 | test_iso.py
test_05_iso_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_iso.py
test_04_extract_Iso | Success | 6.04 | test_iso.py
test_03_delete_iso | Success | 95.23 | test_iso.py
test_02_edit_iso | Success | 0.07 | test_iso.py
test_01_create_iso | Success | 21.93 | test_iso.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 334.19 | test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 203.62 | test_internal_lb.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | Success | 530.95 | test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | Success | 455.89 | test_internal_lb.py
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Success | 10.33 | test_guest_vlan_range.py
test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Success | 0.14 | test_global_settings.py
test_rolepermission_lifecycle_update | Success | 7.12 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_rolepermission_lifecycle_list | Success | 6.89 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_rolepermission_lifecycle_delete | Success | 6.80 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_rolepermission_lifecycle_create | Success | 6.89 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_rolepermission_lifecycle_concurrent_updates | Success | 6.91 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_lifecycle_update_role_inuse | Success | 6.86 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_lifecycle_update | Success | 11.93 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_lifecycle_list | Success | 6.83 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_lifecycle_delete | Success | 6.85 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_lifecycle_create | Success | 6.96 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_inuse_deletion | Success | 6.82 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_account_acls_multiple_mgmt_servers | Success | 9.07 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_role_account_acls | Success | 9.38 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_default_role_deletion | Success | 6.92 | test_dynamicroles.py
test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_disk_offerings.py
test_03_delete_disk_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_disk_offerings.py
test_02_edit_disk_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_disk_offerings.py
test_02_create_sparse_type_disk_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_disk_offerings.py
test_01_create_disk_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_disk_offerings.py
test_deployvm_userdispersing | Success | 20.60 | test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Success | 45.77 | test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_deployvm_firstfit | Success | 55.74 | test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_deployvm_userdata_post | Success | 10.42 | test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_deployvm_userdata | Success | 55.75 | test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_02_deploy_vm_root_resize | Success | 6.91 | test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_01_deploy_vm_root_resize | Success | 6.89 | test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize | Success | 243.55 | test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Success | 208.34 | test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Success | 66.17 | test_affinity_groups.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Skipped | 0.00 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Skipped | 0.00 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Skipped | 0.00 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Skipped | 0.00 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_06_copy_template | Skipped | 0.00 | test_templates.py
test_static_role_account_acls | Skipped | 0.03 | test_staticroles.py
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm | Skipped | 0.03 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_scale_vm | Skipped | 0.00 | test_scale_vm.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi | Skipped | 0.04 | test_primary_storage.py
test_nested_virtualization_vmware | Skipped | 0.00 | test_nested_virtualization.py
test_06_copy_iso | Skipped | 0.00 | test_iso.py
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm | Skipped | 0.03 | test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm.py
test_3d_gpu_support | Skipped | 0.04 | test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm.py
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2714centos7 \u2714debian. JID-303
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2714centos7 \u2714debian. JID-206
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2716centos7 \u2716debian repo: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
A Trillian-Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages and start testing. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by jburwell <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon the URI exception is caused by a attempting to parse an unrecognized/unregistered scheme (lswitch). It would be a problem at runtime for the management server, and need to be addressed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by jburwell <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd Travis appears to have failed due to a missing file. Could you please investigate?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field t...
Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: [CLOUDSTACK-9644] Adding missing bits field to Templ...
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Updated to latest master, and a JIRA ticket has been created.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9644
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@blueorangutan kick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/greenqloud/cloudstack pr-template-bits
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1622
----
commit 3a9ea5021c5c316483d13e0799d56d011a90c34c
Author: Pall Helgason <pa...@greenqloud.com>
Date: 2016-03-03T13:32:24Z
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
----
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2714centos7 \u2714debian. JID-230
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Build failed due to running out of disk space. Will re-trigger.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by ProjectMoon <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Rebased to latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by rhtyd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon can you push -f or close+open this PR to re-kick Travis?
@jburwell Travis was failing on master due to a missing db path, a fix was merged yesterday. All PRs with failing Travis/Jenkins on master need to push -f or close/open the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
Posted by blueorangutan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: \u2714centos6 \u2714centos7 \u2716debian repo: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---