You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk> on 2005/03/28 10:00:27 UTC
Re: x:tree2 problem - Fixed
Sean,
After altering the order I constructed the "tree2" it worked! Added the
parents then the children as I went along. Rather than constructing branches
as I went along and adding the completed branch to the parent. If that makes
sense?
This is reverse to how I did it in Web Galileo.
Feel you could do with some more warning/error messages though as it was
fixed more by luck than judgement.
Regards,
Roger Lee
Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
business reasons.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
To: "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>; "MyFaces Discussion"
<my...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: x:tree2
>I can't think of a reason why your tree wouldn't display. I still
> think the most likely is that the "value" attribute is null b/c this
> causes the encodeChildren method to return without warning (something
> to be fixed in the future.) Any other problem and I would expect an
> exception thrown somewhere.
>
> You mentioned that your jsp is identical to tree2.jsp. How is that
> possible? Tree2.jsp has facets that are specific to the data for that
> example. Unless your data is returning the same values for getType on
> the nodes as they are in the examples, this won't work. I would say
> that is the source of your problem but when this happens, you should
> get an IllegalArgumentException.
>
> Why don't you post your code and jsp if you continue to have problems?
>
> We're still working on the documentation for the components so its
> understandable if there is some confusion right now. :-)
>
> sean
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:01:01 -0000, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
> <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Are you assigning a value to the tree using something like <x:tree2
>> > value="#{foo}">? Also the data needs to be wrapped in TreeNodeBase or
>> > your own custom class that implements TreeNode but it sounds like you
>> > are doing that.
>>
>> Yes my "backer" class does that. I have also taken the backer class
>> (TreeBacker.java) from the examples and used that. Still nothing
>> displays.
>>
>> My JSP is identical to tree2.jsp.
>>
>> > 1.) Your tree has a rendered attribute of false
>>
>> Where would this be set?
>>
>> Regard,
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
>> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
>> Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
>> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
>> viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
>> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
>> Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
>> business reasons.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
>> To: "MyFaces Discussion" <my...@incubator.apache.org>; "Roger Lee,
>> NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: x:tree2
>>
>> > No error messages? Hmm. My guess is one of the following:
>> >
>> > 1.) Your tree has a rendered attribute of false
>> > 2.) Your tree has a value of null for its value attribute.
>> >
>> > Neither of these cases generates a warning in the logs although that
>> > might be a good idea?
>> >
>> > Are you assigning a value to the tree using something like <x:tree2
>> > value="#{foo}">? Also the data needs to be wrapped in TreeNodeBase or
>> > your own custom class that implements TreeNode but it sounds like you
>> > are doing that.
>> >
>> > sean
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:45:44 -0000, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
>> > <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> Using the example supplied with MyFaces I am trying to use the x:tree2
>> >> component.
>> >>
>> >> I have taken the backing class which I used with Web Galileo and
>> >> converted
>> >> it to use TreeNode.
>> >>
>> >> The JSP gets called and my "breakpoints" are displayed in the JBoss
>> >> console,
>> >> but no Tree is rendered or errors thrown.
>> >>
>> >> Any pointers to what I should checking/looking for?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Roger Lee
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: x:tree2 problem - Fixed
Posted by "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>.
Yes originally nothing was been shown in the JSP.
The rendered HTML only had the < head > < title > showing. Even a heading
inside a < verbatim > wasn't appearing.
Maybe it was cached earlier version. The populated tree did suddenly appear!
Anyway thanks for all your help and suggestions.
Regards,
Roger
Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
business reasons.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
To: "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>; "MyFaces Discussion"
<my...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: x:tree2 problem - Fixed
> Roger,
>
> I looked at the code that you sent me offlist. I'm glad you got
> everything working but your explanation of what solved the problem
> seems a bit odd. Originally you were reporting a blank page right?
> That is to say, *absolutely* without even a root node right?
>
> As I said earlier that seems to only be possible if the root node is
> null (and yes we should add a warning there.) Yet your code seemed to
> have created a non-null root node in its call to
> createTreeStructureLoanSelection. Even if the order in which children
> added affected things, it still wouldn't change the fact that your
> root node is not null.
>
> Actually, I thought of one other situation where your tree could be
> blank. That would be if there was no visible HTML rendered inside of
> the appropriate facets. I checked your JSP and you have a facet for
> the "loanHierarchy" type so I don't understand how you could possibly
> have gotten a blank page. I would have expected an emtpy root folder
> (that couldn't be expanded) at a *minimum.*
>
> Are you sure you didn't experience something like this instead? If
> not, then possibly you were running off a cached version of the
> component tree or something?
>
> sean
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:00:27 +0100, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
> <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
>> Sean,
>>
>> After altering the order I constructed the "tree2" it worked! Added the
>> parents then the children as I went along. Rather than constructing
>> branches
>> as I went along and adding the completed branch to the parent. If that
>> makes
>> sense?
>>
>> This is reverse to how I did it in Web Galileo.
>>
>> Feel you could do with some more warning/error messages though as it was
>> fixed more by luck than judgement.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Roger Lee
>>
>> Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
>> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
>> Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
>> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
>> viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
>> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
>> Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
>> business reasons.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
>> To: "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>; "MyFaces Discussion"
>> <my...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: x:tree2
>>
>> >I can't think of a reason why your tree wouldn't display. I still
>> > think the most likely is that the "value" attribute is null b/c this
>> > causes the encodeChildren method to return without warning (something
>> > to be fixed in the future.) Any other problem and I would expect an
>> > exception thrown somewhere.
>> >
>> > You mentioned that your jsp is identical to tree2.jsp. How is that
>> > possible? Tree2.jsp has facets that are specific to the data for that
>> > example. Unless your data is returning the same values for getType on
>> > the nodes as they are in the examples, this won't work. I would say
>> > that is the source of your problem but when this happens, you should
>> > get an IllegalArgumentException.
>> >
>> > Why don't you post your code and jsp if you continue to have problems?
>> >
>> > We're still working on the documentation for the components so its
>> > understandable if there is some confusion right now. :-)
>> >
>> > sean
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:01:01 -0000, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
>> > <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> > Are you assigning a value to the tree using something like <x:tree2
>> >> > value="#{foo}">? Also the data needs to be wrapped in TreeNodeBase
>> >> > or
>> >> > your own custom class that implements TreeNode but it sounds like
>> >> > you
>> >> > are doing that.
>> >>
>> >> Yes my "backer" class does that. I have also taken the backer class
>> >> (TreeBacker.java) from the examples and used that. Still nothing
>> >> displays.
>> >>
>> >> My JSP is identical to tree2.jsp.
>> >>
>> >> > 1.) Your tree has a rendered attribute of false
>> >>
>> >> Where would this be set?
>> >>
>> >> Regard,
>> >>
>> >> Roger
>> >>
>> >> Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
>> >> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
>> >> Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
>> >> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
>> >> viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely
>> >> those
>> >> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
>> >> Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
>> >> business reasons.
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
>> >> To: "MyFaces Discussion" <my...@incubator.apache.org>; "Roger
>> >> Lee,
>> >> NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>
>> >> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:08 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: x:tree2
>> >>
>> >> > No error messages? Hmm. My guess is one of the following:
>> >> >
>> >> > 1.) Your tree has a rendered attribute of false
>> >> > 2.) Your tree has a value of null for its value attribute.
>> >> >
>> >> > Neither of these cases generates a warning in the logs although that
>> >> > might be a good idea?
>> >> >
>> >> > Are you assigning a value to the tree using something like <x:tree2
>> >> > value="#{foo}">? Also the data needs to be wrapped in TreeNodeBase
>> >> > or
>> >> > your own custom class that implements TreeNode but it sounds like
>> >> > you
>> >> > are doing that.
>> >> >
>> >> > sean
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:45:44 -0000, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
>> >> > <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >> Using the example supplied with MyFaces I am trying to use the
>> >> >> x:tree2
>> >> >> component.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have taken the backing class which I used with Web Galileo and
>> >> >> converted
>> >> >> it to use TreeNode.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The JSP gets called and my "breakpoints" are displayed in the JBoss
>> >> >> console,
>> >> >> but no Tree is rendered or errors thrown.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any pointers to what I should checking/looking for?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Roger Lee
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: x:tree2 - Example of Action Listener
Posted by "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>.
Sorted.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
business reasons.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <my...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:33 PM
Subject: x:tree2 - Example of Action Listener
> Does anyone have any examples of the Action Listener for tree2?
>
> Regards,
>
> Roger Lee
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
> Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
> viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
> Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
> business reasons.
>
>
x:tree2 - Example of Action Listener
Posted by "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>.
Does anyone have any examples of the Action Listener for tree2?
Regards,
Roger Lee
Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
business reasons.
Re: x:tree2 problem - Fixed
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Roger,
I looked at the code that you sent me offlist. I'm glad you got
everything working but your explanation of what solved the problem
seems a bit odd. Originally you were reporting a blank page right?
That is to say, *absolutely* without even a root node right?
As I said earlier that seems to only be possible if the root node is
null (and yes we should add a warning there.) Yet your code seemed to
have created a non-null root node in its call to
createTreeStructureLoanSelection. Even if the order in which children
added affected things, it still wouldn't change the fact that your
root node is not null.
Actually, I thought of one other situation where your tree could be
blank. That would be if there was no visible HTML rendered inside of
the appropriate facets. I checked your JSP and you have a facet for
the "loanHierarchy" type so I don't understand how you could possibly
have gotten a blank page. I would have expected an emtpy root folder
(that couldn't be expanded) at a *minimum.*
Are you sure you didn't experience something like this instead? If
not, then possibly you were running off a cached version of the
component tree or something?
sean
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:00:27 +0100, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
<ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> After altering the order I constructed the "tree2" it worked! Added the
> parents then the children as I went along. Rather than constructing branches
> as I went along and adding the completed branch to the parent. If that makes
> sense?
>
> This is reverse to how I did it in Web Galileo.
>
> Feel you could do with some more warning/error messages though as it was
> fixed more by luck than judgement.
>
> Regards,
>
> Roger Lee
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
> Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
> viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
> Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
> business reasons.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
> To: "Roger Lee, NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>; "MyFaces Discussion"
> <my...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: x:tree2
>
> >I can't think of a reason why your tree wouldn't display. I still
> > think the most likely is that the "value" attribute is null b/c this
> > causes the encodeChildren method to return without warning (something
> > to be fixed in the future.) Any other problem and I would expect an
> > exception thrown somewhere.
> >
> > You mentioned that your jsp is identical to tree2.jsp. How is that
> > possible? Tree2.jsp has facets that are specific to the data for that
> > example. Unless your data is returning the same values for getType on
> > the nodes as they are in the examples, this won't work. I would say
> > that is the source of your problem but when this happens, you should
> > get an IllegalArgumentException.
> >
> > Why don't you post your code and jsp if you continue to have problems?
> >
> > We're still working on the documentation for the components so its
> > understandable if there is some confusion right now. :-)
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:01:01 -0000, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
> > <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > Are you assigning a value to the tree using something like <x:tree2
> >> > value="#{foo}">? Also the data needs to be wrapped in TreeNodeBase or
> >> > your own custom class that implements TreeNode but it sounds like you
> >> > are doing that.
> >>
> >> Yes my "backer" class does that. I have also taken the backer class
> >> (TreeBacker.java) from the examples and used that. Still nothing
> >> displays.
> >>
> >> My JSP is identical to tree2.jsp.
> >>
> >> > 1.) Your tree has a rendered attribute of false
> >>
> >> Where would this be set?
> >>
> >> Regard,
> >>
> >> Roger
> >>
> >> Internet communications are not secure and therefore NOTiFY
> >> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
> >> Although NOTiFY operates anti-virus programmes, it does not
> >> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by
> >> viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
> >> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NOTiFY.
> >> Replies to this email may be monitored by NOTiFY for operational or
> >> business reasons.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Sean Schofield" <se...@gmail.com>
> >> To: "MyFaces Discussion" <my...@incubator.apache.org>; "Roger Lee,
> >> NOTiFY" <ro...@notify.co.uk>
> >> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:08 PM
> >> Subject: Re: x:tree2
> >>
> >> > No error messages? Hmm. My guess is one of the following:
> >> >
> >> > 1.) Your tree has a rendered attribute of false
> >> > 2.) Your tree has a value of null for its value attribute.
> >> >
> >> > Neither of these cases generates a warning in the logs although that
> >> > might be a good idea?
> >> >
> >> > Are you assigning a value to the tree using something like <x:tree2
> >> > value="#{foo}">? Also the data needs to be wrapped in TreeNodeBase or
> >> > your own custom class that implements TreeNode but it sounds like you
> >> > are doing that.
> >> >
> >> > sean
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:45:44 -0000, Roger Lee, NOTiFY
> >> > <ro...@notify.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >> Using the example supplied with MyFaces I am trying to use the x:tree2
> >> >> component.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have taken the backing class which I used with Web Galileo and
> >> >> converted
> >> >> it to use TreeNode.
> >> >>
> >> >> The JSP gets called and my "breakpoints" are displayed in the JBoss
> >> >> console,
> >> >> but no Tree is rendered or errors thrown.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any pointers to what I should checking/looking for?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> Roger Lee
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>