You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Cassandra Targett (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/09/06 18:33:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-12208) Don't use "INDEX.sizeInBytes"
as a tag name in policy calculations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16606227#comment-16606227 ]
Cassandra Targett edited comment on SOLR-12208 at 9/6/18 6:32 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~ab], [~noble.paul]: The Ref Guide still references {{INDEX.sizeInBytes}} in 3 places in 2 files: 2x in {{metrics-history.adoc}} and 1x in {{solrcloud-autoscaling-triggers.adoc}}.
ALL of these references need to be changed to {{INDEX.sizeInGB}}, correct?
In {{solrcloud-autoscaling-triggers.adoc}}, the {{aboveBytes}} parameter additionally says the value should be entered in bytes, but it will be compared to a value in GB. Is that accurate after this metric change?
was (Author: ctargett):
[~ab], [~noble.paul]: The Ref Guide still references {{INDEX.sizeInBytes}} in 3 places in 2 files: 2x in {{metrics-history.adoc}} and 1x in {{solrcloud-autoscaling-triggers.adoc}}.
ALL of these references need to be changed to {{INDEX.sizeInGB}}, correct?
In {{solrcloud-autoscaling-triggers.adoc}}, the {{aboveBytes} parameter additionally says the value should be entered in bytes, but it will be compared to a value in GB. Is that accurate after this metric change?
> Don't use "INDEX.sizeInBytes" as a tag name in policy calculations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12208
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12208
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: AutoScaling
> Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki
> Assignee: Andrzej Bialecki
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.5
>
> Attachments: SOLR-12208.patch, SOLR-12208.patch, SOLR-12208.patch
>
>
> CORE_IDX and FREEDISK ConditionType reuse this metric name, but they assume the values are expressed in gigabytes. This alone is confusing considering the name of the metric.
> Additionally, it causes conflicts in the simulation framework that would require substantial changes to resolve (ReplicaInfo-s in SimClusterStateProvider keep metric values in their variables, expressed in original units - but then the Policy assumes it can put the values expressed in GB under the same key... hilarity ensues).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org