You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/20 21:24:39 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4236) clean up booleanquery conjunction
optimizations a bit
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14003858#comment-14003858 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4236:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1596372 from [~rcmuir] in branch 'dev/branches/lucene4236'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1596372 ]
LUCENE-4236: create branch to try to cleanup
> clean up booleanquery conjunction optimizations a bit
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4236
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4236
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.9, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4236.patch, LUCENE-4236.patch, LUCENE-4236.patch, LUCENE-4236.patch, LUCENE-4236.patch
>
>
> After LUCENE-3505, I want to do a slight cleanup:
> * compute the term conjunctions optimization in scorer(), so its applied even if we have optional and prohibited clauses that dont exist in the segment (e.g. return null)
> * use the term conjunctions optimization when optional.size() == minShouldMatch, as that means they are all mandatory, too.
> * don't return booleanscorer1 when optional.size() == minShouldMatch, because it means we have required clauses and in general BS2 should do a much better job (e.g. use advance).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org