You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by larsivi <la...@igesund.net> on 2007/03/01 11:20:49 UTC

JmsInUsingJCABinding vs JmsEndpoint

We have some old components subclassing JmsInUsingJCABinding, but while
upgrading to SMX 3.1, I get a feeling that JmsEndpoint may be an equally
good choice. Neither of them have much documentation saying why I would
choose either over the other.

In which cases should I consider the JCABinding, and also, since I already
is using that one, what would I gain by moving to JmsEndpoint (except
hopefully cleaner configuration)?

Thanks!
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JmsInUsingJCABinding-vs-JmsEndpoint-tf3326077s12049.html#a9247059
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: JmsInUsingJCABinding vs JmsEndpoint

Posted by larsivi <la...@igesund.net>.

I actually meant JmsComponent and not JmsEndpoint, but I guess you get the
drift.

And are simplified/cleaned up configuration planned/possible for the
JmsInUsingJCABinding ?

Regards


larsivi wrote:
> 
> We have some old components subclassing JmsInUsingJCABinding, but while
> upgrading to SMX 3.1, I get a feeling that JmsEndpoint may be an equally
> good choice. Neither of them have much documentation saying why I would
> choose either over the other.
> 
> In which cases should I consider the JCABinding, and also, since I already
> is using that one, what would I gain by moving to JmsEndpoint (except
> hopefully cleaner configuration)?
> 
> Thanks!
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JmsInUsingJCABinding-vs-JmsEndpoint-tf3326077s12049.html#a9248168
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.