You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Gilles (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/03/09 14:02:27 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (MATH-349) Dangerous code in "PoissonDistributionImpl"

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gilles resolved MATH-349.
-------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Issue is partially fixed (removed the consistency problem) in revision 920852.
Setters were marked as deprecated.


> Dangerous code in "PoissonDistributionImpl"
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-349
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-349
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Gilles
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In the following excerpt from class "PoissonDistributionImpl":
> {code:title=PoissonDistributionImpl.java|borderStyle=solid}
>     public PoissonDistributionImpl(double p, NormalDistribution z) {
>         super();
>         setNormal(z);
>         setMean(p);
>     }
> {code}
> (1) Overridable methods are called within the constructor.
> (2) The reference "z" is stored and modified within the class.
> I've encountered problem (1) in several classes while working on issue 348. In those cases, in order to remove potential problems, I copied/pasted the body of the "setter" methods inside the constructor but I think that a more elegant solution would be to remove the "setters" altogether (i.e. make the classes immutable).
> Problem (2) can also create unexpected behaviour. Is it really necessary to pass the "NormalDistribution" object; can't it be always created within the class?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.