You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@asterixdb.apache.org by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> on 2015/03/15 22:19:04 UTC
Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Hi Everyone,
Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
Yay!
I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
it, please feel free.
Also our JIRA instance is also up:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
It’s accessible at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
That’s the right way! :)
Sending email to infrastructure@apache.org would also work too,
thank you Till!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org"
<de...@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM
To: "dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org"
<de...@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
>Ok, I’ve filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306
><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306>, hoping that that’s
>the right way of asking infra.
>
>Till
>
>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>><ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>
>> My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back what
>>you hear thanks!
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to
>>>have 2 repositories here. However,
>>> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules
>>>and
>>> b) if other people think differently about this.
>>>
>>> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on
>>>>Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually
>>>>briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they
>>>>are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over
>>>>code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for
>>>>1 community.
>>>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice
>>>>if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each
>>>>>directory
>>>>> contains.
>>>>>
>>>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both
>>>>>releases
>>>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for
>>>>>>sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't
>>>>>>tried either).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra
>>>>>>><he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the
>>>>>>>>SGA?
>>>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB
>>>>>>>>and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend
>>>>>>>>on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to
>>>>>>>>have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up
>>>>>>>>with that question earlier …).
>>>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to
>>>>>>>>migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>>>>>>><ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>.
On 26 Mar 2015, at 13:50, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2015-03-26 21:31, Ate Douma wrote:
>> On 2015-03-26 20:35, Ate Douma wrote:
>>> Hi team,
>>>
>>> Sorry for chiming a bit late on this but I have a suggestion on this
>>> proposal/request:
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-21 13:31, Till Westmann wrote:
>>>> Ok, I’ve filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306>, hoping that
>>>> that’s the
>>>> right way of asking infra.
>>>
>>> I just saw the request from INFRA for confirmation on this by one or
>>> more of the
>>> mentors.
>>> I'm OK giving my confirmation on this, as I think it indeed is much
>>> better
>>> (needed really) to have two git repositories for this.
>>>
>>> However, I see the request has been made for an additional
>>> repository named:
>>> incubator-hyracks
>>>
>>> I think this better, and better aligned, to be named:
>>> incubator-asterixdb-hyracks
>>>
>>> The project name typically is used as 'prefix' when using multiple
>>> (git)
>>> repositories, see [1], and I think we should stick to this
>>> convention.
>>> Otherwise it might be assumed there is another/independent
>>> (incubator) hyracks
>>> project, which clearly isn't the case.
>>
>> FYI: turns out there isn't much to discuss about :)
>>
>> INFRA just updated the ticket making clear the repository name has to
>> be
>> incubator-asterixdb-$thing anyway.
>>
>
> Its done:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-asterixdb-hyracks.git
Cool. That should make things easier (and thanks for getting for the
github mirror as well).
>>
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> As INFRA is likely to proceed with creation of the second repository
>>> any time
>>> soon now, I'll add this suggestion (without conclusion) to the issue
>>> now, so
>>> INFRA is made aware of this still to be decided.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ate
>>>
>>> [1] http://git.apache.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back
>>>>> what you
>>>>> hear thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right”
>>>>>> choice to have 2
>>>>>> repositories here. However,
>>>>>> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an
>>>>>> unchangeable rules and
>>>>>> b) if other people think differently about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on
>>>>>>> Hyracks as
>>>>>>> well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually
>>>>>>> briefly
>>>>>>> considered to propose both projects separately, but since they
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community
>>>>>>> over code” more
>>>>>>> than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1
>>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten
>>>>>>> different advice if we
>>>>>>> had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra
>>>>>>>> <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each
>>>>>>>> directory
>>>>>>>> contains.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both
>>>>>>>> releases
>>>>>>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project
>>>>>>>> perspective.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann
>>>>>>>>> <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>>>>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you
>>>>>>>>> haven't tried
>>>>>>>>> either).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra
>>>>>>>>>> <he...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>>>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and
>>>>>>>>>> hyracks?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann
>>>>>>>>>>> <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on
>>>>>>>>>>> the SGA?
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for
>>>>>>>>>>> AsterixDB and one
>>>>>>>>>>> for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on
>>>>>>>>>>> Hyracks
>>>>>>>>>>> that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have
>>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>>> repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up
>>>>>>>>>>> with that
>>>>>>>>>>> question earlier …).
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to
>>>>>>>>>>> migrate
>>>>>>>>>>> issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
>>>>>>>>>>>> USA
>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 2015-03-26 21:31, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2015-03-26 20:35, Ate Douma wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> Sorry for chiming a bit late on this but I have a suggestion on this
>> proposal/request:
>>
>> On 2015-03-21 13:31, Till Westmann wrote:
>>> Ok, I’ve filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306>, hoping that that’s the
>>> right way of asking infra.
>>
>> I just saw the request from INFRA for confirmation on this by one or more of the
>> mentors.
>> I'm OK giving my confirmation on this, as I think it indeed is much better
>> (needed really) to have two git repositories for this.
>>
>> However, I see the request has been made for an additional repository named:
>> incubator-hyracks
>>
>> I think this better, and better aligned, to be named: incubator-asterixdb-hyracks
>>
>> The project name typically is used as 'prefix' when using multiple (git)
>> repositories, see [1], and I think we should stick to this convention.
>> Otherwise it might be assumed there is another/independent (incubator) hyracks
>> project, which clearly isn't the case.
>
> FYI: turns out there isn't much to discuss about :)
>
> INFRA just updated the ticket making clear the repository name has to be
> incubator-asterixdb-$thing anyway.
>
Its done: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-asterixdb-hyracks.git
>
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> As INFRA is likely to proceed with creation of the second repository any time
>> soon now, I'll add this suggestion (without conclusion) to the issue now, so
>> INFRA is made aware of this still to be decided.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ate
>>
>> [1] http://git.apache.org/
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Till
>>>
>>>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back what you
>>>> hear thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2
>>>>> repositories here. However,
>>>>> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
>>>>> b) if other people think differently about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as
>>>>>> well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly
>>>>>> considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are
>>>>>> developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more
>>>>>> than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
>>>>>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we
>>>>>> had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>>>>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>>>>>>> contains.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>>>>>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>>>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for
>>>>>>>> sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried
>>>>>>>> either).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one
>>>>>>>>>> for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks
>>>>>>>>>> that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2
>>>>>>>>>> repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that
>>>>>>>>>> question earlier …).
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate
>>>>>>>>>> issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>>>>>>>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 2015-03-26 20:35, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Sorry for chiming a bit late on this but I have a suggestion on this
> proposal/request:
>
> On 2015-03-21 13:31, Till Westmann wrote:
>> Ok, I’ve filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306>, hoping that that’s the
>> right way of asking infra.
>
> I just saw the request from INFRA for confirmation on this by one or more of the
> mentors.
> I'm OK giving my confirmation on this, as I think it indeed is much better
> (needed really) to have two git repositories for this.
>
> However, I see the request has been made for an additional repository named:
> incubator-hyracks
>
> I think this better, and better aligned, to be named: incubator-asterixdb-hyracks
>
> The project name typically is used as 'prefix' when using multiple (git)
> repositories, see [1], and I think we should stick to this convention.
> Otherwise it might be assumed there is another/independent (incubator) hyracks
> project, which clearly isn't the case.
FYI: turns out there isn't much to discuss about :)
INFRA just updated the ticket making clear the repository name has to be
incubator-asterixdb-$thing anyway.
>
> WDYT?
>
> As INFRA is likely to proceed with creation of the second repository any time
> soon now, I'll add this suggestion (without conclusion) to the issue now, so
> INFRA is made aware of this still to be decided.
>
> Regards,
> Ate
>
> [1] http://git.apache.org/
>
>
>>
>> Till
>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back what you
>>> hear thanks!
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2
>>>> repositories here. However,
>>>> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
>>>> b) if other people think differently about this.
>>>>
>>>> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as
>>>>> well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly
>>>>> considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are
>>>>> developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more
>>>>> than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
>>>>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we
>>>>> had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>>>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>>>>>> contains.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>>>>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for
>>>>>>> sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried
>>>>>>> either).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one
>>>>>>>>> for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks
>>>>>>>>> that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2
>>>>>>>>> repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that
>>>>>>>>> question earlier …).
>>>>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate
>>>>>>>>> issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>>>>>>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
Hi team,
Sorry for chiming a bit late on this but I have a suggestion on this
proposal/request:
On 2015-03-21 13:31, Till Westmann wrote:
> Ok, I’ve filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306>, hoping that that’s the right way of asking infra.
I just saw the request from INFRA for confirmation on this by one or more of the
mentors.
I'm OK giving my confirmation on this, as I think it indeed is much better
(needed really) to have two git repositories for this.
However, I see the request has been made for an additional repository named:
incubator-hyracks
I think this better, and better aligned, to be named: incubator-asterixdb-hyracks
The project name typically is used as 'prefix' when using multiple (git)
repositories, see [1], and I think we should stick to this convention.
Otherwise it might be assumed there is another/independent (incubator) hyracks
project, which clearly isn't the case.
WDYT?
As INFRA is likely to proceed with creation of the second repository any time
soon now, I'll add this suggestion (without conclusion) to the issue now, so
INFRA is made aware of this still to be decided.
Regards,
Ate
[1] http://git.apache.org/
>
> Till
>
>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>
>> My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back what you hear thanks!
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2 repositories here. However,
>>> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
>>> b) if other people think differently about this.
>>>
>>> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
>>>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>>>>> contains.
>>>>>
>>>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>>>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>.
Ok, I’ve filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9306>, hoping that that’s the right way of asking infra.
Till
> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back what you hear thanks!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2 repositories here. However,
>> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
>> b) if other people think differently about this.
>>
>> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
>>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>>>> contains.
>>>>
>>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>>
>>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
My guess is this is possible just ask infra and please report back what you hear thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2 repositories here. However,
> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
> b) if other people think differently about this.
>
> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>>> contains.
>>>
>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>
>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
As far as I know, each project should only have one repo.
Having 2 repos mean you have 2 individual projects.
In our case, we wanted the core AsterixDB and Hyracks together as
related modules.
- Henry
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2 repositories here. However,
> a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
> b) if other people think differently about this.
>
> What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
>> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>>> contains.
>>>
>>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>
>>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> HI Till,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>.
Hi,
coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2 repositories here. However,
a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and
b) if other people think differently about this.
What are your thoughts/opinions on this?
Thanks,
Till
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
> What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
>> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
>> contains.
>>
>> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
>> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Henry,
>>>
>>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HI Till,
>>>>
>>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>>
>>>> - Henry
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>.
So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community.
What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we had discussed this before starting incubation?
Thanks,
Till
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
> contains.
>
> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Henry,
>>
>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> HI Till,
>>>
>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>>
>>> - Henry
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yay!
>>>>>
>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>>
>>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Chris
>>>>>
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for
asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory
contains.
The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases
and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>
>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> HI Till,
>>
>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yay!
>>>>
>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>>> it, please feel free.
>>>>
>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>>
>>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>> Chief Architect
>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>.
Hi Henry,
not sure, never tried to work like this with git :)
Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried either).
Thanks,
Till
> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> HI Till,
>
> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
>
> - Henry
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I’ve got a few questions:
>>
>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>>
>>>
>>> Yay!
>>>
>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>>> it, please feel free.
>>>
>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>>
>>> It’s accessible at:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Chief Architect
>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
HI Till,
I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo.
Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks?
- Henry
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks!
>
> I’ve got a few questions:
>
> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>>
>>
>> Yay!
>>
>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
>> it, please feel free.
>>
>> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>>
>> It’s accessible at:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Read/Write Git repo up and JIRA instance
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org>.
Hi Chris,
Thanks!
I’ve got a few questions:
1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA?
2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …).
3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues from Google Code to the Apache JIRA.
Thanks,
Till
> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212
>
>
> Yay!
>
> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use
> it, please feel free.
>
> Also our JIRA instance is also up:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213
>
> It’s accessible at:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>