You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Sandy Ryza (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/01/03 02:03:52 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1539) Queue admin ACLs should NOT be similar to submit-acls w.r.t hierarchy.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13861051#comment-13861051 ] 

Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1539:
----------------------------------

Verified that the Fair Scheduler has the same behavior.

> Queue admin ACLs should NOT be similar to submit-acls w.r.t hierarchy.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1539
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>
> Today, Queue admin ACLs are similar to submit-acls w.r.t hierarchy in that if one has to be able to administer a queue, he/she should be an admin of all the queues in the ancestry - an unnecessary burden.
> This was added in YARN-899 and I believe is wrong semantics as well as implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)