You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-user@james.apache.org by Peter Romianowski <an...@gmx.de> on 2001/10/14 23:35:29 UTC

may I use a current CVS snapshot as production server?

Hi,

the subject says it all - what are the opinions about that? Should I wait
until the next final release? Currently I am using 1.2.1 and I am happy with
that, besides that POP seems to be slow sometimes and that nasty "German
Date"-Problem (the one that results in displaying the "received date" in
outlook as "13.01.2001" instead of "13.10.2001". I saw that this bug has
been fixed, but I am not sure how to apply the fix to my current
1.2.1-version. (I'm a bit confused because of the discussion about the
RFC822DateFormat-class)

Nevertheless I would really like to check out the newest version - but I am
a bit afraid :-)

Can someone asure me? Or not? (-:

Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


RE: may I use a current CVS snapshot as production server?

Posted by Danny Angus <da...@thought.co.uk>.
the date bug hasn't been fixed. :-(
if you use the file system to store inbox mails this too currently has a
bug.

I'd hold off until the next release, which is due soon.
But you could always get the version in cvs and try it for yourself.

d.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Romianowski [mailto:antarapero@gmx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 10:35 PM
> To: james-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: may I use a current CVS snapshot as production server?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> the subject says it all - what are the opinions about that? Should I wait
> until the next final release? Currently I am using 1.2.1 and I am
> happy with
> that, besides that POP seems to be slow sometimes and that nasty "German
> Date"-Problem (the one that results in displaying the "received date" in
> outlook as "13.01.2001" instead of "13.10.2001". I saw that this bug has
> been fixed, but I am not sure how to apply the fix to my current
> 1.2.1-version. (I'm a bit confused because of the discussion about the
> RFC822DateFormat-class)
>
> Nevertheless I would really like to check out the newest version
> - but I am
> a bit afraid :-)
>
> Can someone asure me? Or not? (-:
>
> Peter
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org