You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Jeffry Houser <je...@dot-com-it.com> on 2012/11/27 20:28:43 UTC
Re: [Discuss] Maven and Apache Flex
As I understand it, Maven is an automated build tool. Kind of like
ANT on steroids.
On 11/27/2012 2:20 PM, Harbs wrote:
> 0. I have never quite figured out what Maven is or why I'd want to use it. (and I do speak yiddish…) ;-)
>
> If someone could enlighten me, I could change my mind…
>
> Harbs
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> 1. Number of people who will use Maven to develop Flex apps at your company
>> (0 if you have no interest in using Maven).
>
Re: AW: [Discuss] Maven and Apache Flex
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 11/28/12 7:00 AM, "Simon Morvan" <ga...@zone84.net> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Velo's communication policy is disruptive* yet Flexmojos is open-source.
> Nothing blocks us from make it a true Apache project, in the scope of
> Flex (preferably) or in it's own scope. Communication policy would be
> then ruled by the community.
Actually, that's probably not true. Even though it is open-source, it is
"owned" and we cannot copy it into Apache without the owner's permission.
Well, we probably "can" but it is against Apache policy to do so.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: AW: [Discuss] Maven and Apache Flex
Posted by Simon Morvan <ga...@zone84.net>.
Le 27/11/2012 23:04, christofer.dutz@c-ware.de a écrit :
> Even if I'm currently the project lead of Flexmojos, I would strongly suggest not to go that road.
>
> There is far too much legacy stuff to carry with Flexmojos and I have to admit that the rather restricive communication policy of Velo is rather discouraging.
>
> I think IF WE WERE TO GO THAT ROAD, developing an Apache Flex plugin first and using that to compile the Framework libs sounds like a far better solution.
> This way we would have controll over the entire stack needed to build Flex.
Chris,
Velo's communication policy is disruptive* yet Flexmojos is open-source.
Nothing blocks us from make it a true Apache project, in the scope of
Flex (preferably) or in it's own scope. Communication policy would be
then ruled by the community.
*well... in my opinion, it's just self defence of a sole individual
overflowed by its user-base rants and complaints.
--
Simon
AW: [Discuss] Maven and Apache Flex
Posted by "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Even if I'm currently the project lead of Flexmojos, I would strongly suggest not to go that road.
There is far too much legacy stuff to carry with Flexmojos and I have to admit that the rather restricive communication policy of Velo is rather discouraging.
I think IF WE WERE TO GO THAT ROAD, developing an Apache Flex plugin first and using that to compile the Framework libs sounds like a far better solution.
This way we would have controll over the entire stack needed to build Flex.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: omuppi1@gmail.com [mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Om
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2012 20:41
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; jeffry@dot-com-it.com
Betreff: Re: [Discuss] Maven and Apache Flex
I have initiated a thread with my UI architecture team. Will send out the poll responses soon.
In the meantime, here is a gauge of the popularity of this feature. This is the most voted-on issue in our JIRA base.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33086
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewVoters!default.jspa?id=12538816
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jeffry Houser <je...@dot-com-it.com>wrote:
>
> As I understand it, Maven is an automated build tool. Kind of like
> ANT on steroids.
>
>
> On 11/27/2012 2:20 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> 0. I have never quite figured out what Maven is or why I'd want to
>> use it. (and I do speak yiddish.) ;-)
>>
>> If someone could enlighten me, I could change my mind.
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> 1. Number of people who will use Maven to develop Flex apps at your
>>> company
>>> (0 if you have no interest in using Maven).
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [Discuss] Maven and Apache Flex
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
I have initiated a thread with my UI architecture team. Will send out the
poll responses soon.
In the meantime, here is a gauge of the popularity of this feature. This
is the most voted-on issue in our JIRA base.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33086
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewVoters!default.jspa?id=12538816
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jeffry Houser <je...@dot-com-it.com>wrote:
>
> As I understand it, Maven is an automated build tool. Kind of like ANT
> on steroids.
>
>
> On 11/27/2012 2:20 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> 0. I have never quite figured out what Maven is or why I'd want to use
>> it. (and I do speak yiddish…) ;-)
>>
>> If someone could enlighten me, I could change my mind…
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> 1. Number of people who will use Maven to develop Flex apps at your
>>> company
>>> (0 if you have no interest in using Maven).
>>>
>>
>>
>