You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ian Brockbank <Ia...@wolfsonmicro.com> on 2004/09/07 00:40:00 UTC

RE: libdb42.dll missing

Hi McClain,

> <editorial>
> my 0.02usd says that we are putting ourselves and our users in the
> worst possible situation by shipping our own svn/apr/bdb.   that being
> said, does the win32 svn package include javahl? if it doesn't win32
> users of subclipse would be screwed if we removed it (until javahl
> came along with stock svn packages).
> </editorial>

[Cross-posted to dev@subversion in case anyone there cares to comment).
My understanding is that svn doesn't install any bindings, not even
svnjavahl.  This means that anyone wanting to use them has to build them
- which is more than the average Win32 user (or even developer) expects.
It would be good if a basic set of bindings (say Java, Perl and python)
were installed if the installer detected that the appropriate tool was
also installed, but they're just starting to take an interest in taking
the bindings to the same level as the core.

Cheers,

Ian Brockbank
Senior Applications Software Engineer
e: ian.brockbank@wolfsonmicro.com / apps@wolfsonmicro.com
scd: ian@scottishdance.net
t: +44 131 272 7145
f: +44 131 272 7001

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org


Re: libdb42.dll missing

Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:40:00AM +0100, Ian Brockbank wrote:
> [Cross-posted to dev@subversion in case anyone there cares to comment).
> My understanding is that svn doesn't install any bindings, not even
> svnjavahl.  This means that anyone wanting to use them has to build them
> - which is more than the average Win32 user (or even developer) expects.
> It would be good if a basic set of bindings (say Java, Perl and python)
> were installed if the installer detected that the appropriate tool was
> also installed, but they're just starting to take an interest in taking
> the bindings to the same level as the core.

Not sure about Python but in the case oer Perl the bindings must be
built against a binary compatable version of Perl.  Which generally
means the exact version you're running against.  Given that Windows
doesn't ship with Perl, I have no idea how we could ever ship a set of
Perl bindings without shipping a copy of Perl.  Which is never going to
happen.

-- 
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org

"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org