You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Fabian Hueske (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/02/07 10:11:34 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-1476) Flink VS Spark on loop test

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Fabian Hueske updated FLINK-1476:
---------------------------------
    Priority: Minor  (was: Critical)

> Flink VS Spark on loop test
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1476
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1476
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Test
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0-incubating, 0.8
>         Environment: 3 machines, every machines has 24 CPU cores and allocate 16 CPU cores for the tests. The memory situation is: 3 * 32G
>            Reporter: xuhong
>            Priority: Minor
>
>     In the last days, i did some test on flink and spark. The test results shows that flink can do better on many operations, such as GroupBy, Join and some complex jobs. But when I do the KMeans, LinearRegression and other loop tests, i found that flink is no more excellent than spark. I want to konw, whether flink is more comfortable to do the loop jobs with spark.
>     I add code: env.setDegreeOfParallelism(16) in each test to allocate same CPU cores as in Spark tests.
>     My english is not good, i wish you guys can understand me!
> the following is some config of my Flnk:
> jobmanager.rpc.port: 6123
> jobmanager.heap.mb: 2048
> taskmanager.heap.mb: 2048
> taskmanager.numberOfTaskSlots: 24
> parallelization.degree.default: 72
> jobmanager.web.port: 8081
> webclient.port: 8085
> fs.overwrite-files: true
> taskmanager.memory.fraction: 0.8
> taskmanager.network.numberofBuffers: 70000



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)