You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com> on 2002/03/28 07:36:42 UTC
FAQ
We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
having one in xdocs.
Thoughts?
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
I've added the dtd, xsl and a sample FAQ, but do not know how to get
Cocoon to process it ...
- Paul
> OK I will put back one we can consider a strting point... If the vote
> goes the other way we will remove.
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Peter,
OK I will put back one we can consider a strting point... If the vote
goes the other way we will remove.
- Paul
>On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:44, Paul Hammant wrote:
>
>>Peter,
>>
>>>On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
>>>
>>>>We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
>>>>ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
>>>>having one in xdocs.
>>>>
>>>>Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>+1
>>>
>>How fond were you of the old way? i.e. the xdocs syntax and the custom
>>stylesheet. I thought it worked quite well, but may not fit in with the
>>new ideas for xdocs
>>
>
>+1 for old way. But name the file something other than xml to make it easy to
>auotmate transformation using ant patterns. Perhaps name them ${name}.xfaq or
>similar so we can pick them out like
>
><pattern name="**/*.xfaq"/>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:44, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Peter,
>
> >On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
> >>We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
> >>ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
> >>having one in xdocs.
> >>
> >>Thoughts?
> >
> >+1
>
> How fond were you of the old way? i.e. the xdocs syntax and the custom
> stylesheet. I thought it worked quite well, but may not fit in with the
> new ideas for xdocs
+1 for old way. But name the file something other than xml to make it easy to
auotmate transformation using ant patterns. Perhaps name them ${name}.xfaq or
similar so we can pick them out like
<pattern name="**/*.xfaq"/>
--
Cheers,
Pete
---------------------------------------------------
"Therefore it can be said that victorious warriors
win first, and then go to battle, while defeated
warriors go to battle first, and then seek to win."
- Sun Tzu, the Art Of War
---------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Peter,
>On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
>
>>We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
>>ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
>>having one in xdocs.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>
>+1
>
How fond were you of the old way? i.e. the xdocs syntax and the custom
stylesheet. I thought it worked quite well, but may not fit in with the
new ideas for xdocs
- Paul
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: FAQ
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:24 AM
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: FAQ
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the
> sake of some
> > ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should
> think again of
> > having one in xdocs.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> +1
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> We shall not cease from exploration, and the
> end of all our exploring will be to arrive
> where we started and know the place for the
> first time -- T.S. Eliot
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:avalon-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For
> additional commands,
> e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
> We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
> ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
> having one in xdocs.
>
> Thoughts?
+1
--
Cheers,
Pete
---------------------------------------------
We shall not cease from exploration, and the
end of all our exploring will be to arrive
where we started and know the place for the
first time -- T.S. Eliot
---------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Jason,
>>We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
>>ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
>>having one in xdocs.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>
>I'd be willing to work on a format. I'm trying to work one out for Maven
>at the moment along with some other documents.
>
>
What we used to have well over a year ago has been resurrected in part
with the following files.
jakarta-avalon\tools\documentation\stylesheets\faqs2document.xsl
jakarta-avalon\src\xdocs\faq.xfaq
jakarta-avalon\src\xdocs\dtd\faq-v10.dtd
It does not generate at the moment ( I am unsure how to key in the xfaq
suffic to Cocoon).
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FAQ
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 01:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
> We used to have a FAQ in xdocs, but got rid of it for the sake of some
> ambitious central & online version. Perhaps we should think again of
> having one in xdocs.
>
> Thoughts?
I'd be willing to work on a format. I'm trying to work one out for Maven
at the moment along with some other documents.
> - Paul
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FtpServer
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I just played with ftpserver and I got to say it looks very good. I would
highly recomend that you do a bit of documenting and then start releasing
versions and publicising them on different places (like freshmeat). Anyways
it looks all good!
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:33, Rana Bhattacharyya wrote:
> I have one question about ftpserver administration.
> Currently we are using a RMI based admin tool. Here
> RMI callbacks have been used extensively. So basically
> it is two way communication. RMI part follows adapter
> design pattern.
>
> Is it really required to have a GUI to monitor the
> server?
it may not be necessary but it is damn nice and a great selling point IMHO :)
> Instead we can use ftp SITE commands. In fact
> the ftpserver with proper SITE functionalities is
> working in my local system. Can we get rid of that RMI
> admin GUI completely?
I would leave it in but it is completely up to you. Maybe you could have
admin available via both the GUI and via site commands?
--
Cheers,
Pete
------------------------------------------------------------
I just got lost in thought... It was unfamiliar territory.
------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: FtpServer
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:48 AM
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: FtpServer
>
>
> Rana,
>
> I'd say go for getting rid of RMI.
> I'd also say keep the GUI, but use SITE commands to reach to
> the server...
>
> How does that sound?
>
> - Paul
>
> >Hi,
> > I have one question about ftpserver administration.
> >Currently we are using a RMI based admin tool. Here
> >RMI callbacks have been used extensively. So basically
> >it is two way communication. RMI part follows adapter
> >design pattern.
> >
> >Is it really required to have a GUI to monitor the
> >server? Instead we can use ftp SITE commands. In fact
> >the ftpserver with proper SITE functionalities is
> >working in my local system. Can we get rid of that RMI
> >admin GUI completely?
> >
> >What do you guys think?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Rana.
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy AwardsR
> >http://movies.yahoo.com/
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:avalon-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> >For
> additional commands,
> e-mail:
> ><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:avalon-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For
> additional commands,
> e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FtpServer
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Rana,
I'd say go for getting rid of RMI.
I'd also say keep the GUI, but use SITE commands to reach to the server...
How does that sound?
- Paul
>Hi,
> I have one question about ftpserver administration.
>Currently we are using a RMI based admin tool. Here
>RMI callbacks have been used extensively. So basically
>it is two way communication. RMI part follows adapter
>design pattern.
>
>Is it really required to have a GUI to monitor the
>server? Instead we can use ftp SITE commands. In fact
>the ftpserver with proper SITE functionalities is
>working in my local system. Can we get rid of that RMI
>admin GUI completely?
>
>What do you guys think?
>
>Thanks,
>Rana.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
>http://movies.yahoo.com/
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FtpServer
Posted by Shawn Boyce <sh...@qcominc.com>.
Rana,
Should this discussion should be on the low-traffic Avalon Apps mailing
list?
Supporting the GUI is a nice feature.
Also, I was recently digging into the ftpserver code to use it as the basis
for a telnet server. Just wanted to say nice job!
Rana Bhattacharyya wrote:
>Hi,
> I have one question about ftpserver administration.
>Currently we are using a RMI based admin tool. Here
>RMI callbacks have been used extensively. So basically
>it is two way communication. RMI part follows adapter
>design pattern.
>
>Is it really required to have a GUI to monitor the
>server? Instead we can use ftp SITE commands. In fact
>the ftpserver with proper SITE functionalities is
>working in my local system. Can we get rid of that RMI
>admin GUI completely?
>
>What do you guys think?
>
>Thanks,
>Rana.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
>http://movies.yahoo.com/
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
--
Shawn Boyce
QCOM, Inc.
Quality Software is Our Business
http://www.qcominc.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
FtpServer
Posted by Rana Bhattacharyya <ra...@yahoo.com>.
Hi,
I have one question about ftpserver administration.
Currently we are using a RMI based admin tool. Here
RMI callbacks have been used extensively. So basically
it is two way communication. RMI part follows adapter
design pattern.
Is it really required to have a GUI to monitor the
server? Instead we can use ftp SITE commands. In fact
the ftpserver with proper SITE functionalities is
working in my local system. Can we get rid of that RMI
admin GUI completely?
What do you guys think?
Thanks,
Rana.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards�
http://movies.yahoo.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>