You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@trafficserver.apache.org by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> on 2021/11/17 20:11:47 UTC
"F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Hi all,
As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list. The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate testing of all upcoming releases.
We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you wish to participate in this discussion.
— Leif
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Sudheer Vinukonda <su...@yahoo.com>.
+1
I'd like to participate as well!
(Sorry, my previous reply bounced - hope this makes it through)
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 12:19:59 PM PST, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
Ping on this, there has to be more than three people who cares about the next ~year releases?
— Leif
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:11 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list. The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate testing of all upcoming releases.
>
> We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you wish to participate in this discussion.
>
> — Leif
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Mark Torluemke <mt...@apache.org>.
Count me in.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ping on this, there has to be more than three people who cares about the
> next ~year releases?
>
> — Leif
>
>
> > On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:11 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works
> for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from
> any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The
> goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where
> we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have
> such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list.
> The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant
> number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate
> testing of all upcoming releases.
> >
> > We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you
> wish to participate in this discussion.
> >
> > — Leif
>
>
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Sudheer Vinukonda <su...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1
I'd like to participate as well!
(Sorry, my previous reply bounced - hope this makes it through)
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 12:19:59 PM PST, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
Ping on this, there has to be more than three people who cares about the next ~year releases?
— Leif
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:11 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list. The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate testing of all upcoming releases.
>
> We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you wish to participate in this discussion.
>
> — Leif
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Mark Torluemke <mt...@apache.org>.
Count me in.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ping on this, there has to be more than three people who cares about the
> next ~year releases?
>
> — Leif
>
>
> > On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:11 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works
> for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from
> any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The
> goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where
> we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have
> such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list.
> The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant
> number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate
> testing of all upcoming releases.
> >
> > We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you
> wish to participate in this discussion.
> >
> > — Leif
>
>
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
Ping on this, there has to be more than three people who cares about the next ~year releases?
— Leif
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:11 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list. The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate testing of all upcoming releases.
>
> We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you wish to participate in this discussion.
>
> — Leif
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
Ping on this, there has to be more than three people who cares about the next ~year releases?
— Leif
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:11 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list. The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate testing of all upcoming releases.
>
> We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you wish to participate in this discussion.
>
> — Leif
Re: "F2F" (well, online) working group for a release schedule proposal
Posted by Evan Zelkowitz <ez...@apache.org>.
You can add me to the discussion
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 1:12 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in todays Summit, to come up with a release plan that works
> for most of us, I’d like to have a “F2F" (online) with representatives from
> any organization / team that is interested in the upcoming releases. The
> goal would be to have an inclusive, but not too large, working group where
> we can come together and agree on a proposal for releases. Once we have
> such a proposal, we will present it to the community on the mailing list.
> The main idea here is that we propose a release cycle where a significant
> number of teams and organizations is able and willing to do appropriate
> testing of all upcoming releases.
>
> We will aim for the week of 11/29 to meet. Please let me know if you wish
> to participate in this discussion.
>
> — Leif