You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@logging.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2013/09/09 15:11:25 UTC
[VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Hi all,
after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release.
log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
(revision 2850)
Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt.
The tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1
(revision 1520872)
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
RAT Report:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep
2013
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Thanks!
Stefan
Re: [RESULT] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-09-12, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Now that the SDK reference is on logging.apache.org the page encoding is
> broken again. There's something fishy going there. See this screenshot:
Ouch.
The main difference is one svn commit/checkout cycle.
I think svn expects files to have an UTF-8 encoding so it may break the
Windows CP1252 encoding of the sdk files. I'll try to figure out a
solution.
Stefan
AW: [RESULT] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
*hm*
Now that the SDK reference is on logging.apache.org the page encoding is
broken again. There's something fishy going there. See this screenshot:
While it was on ~bodewig@ao it used to be ok.
The downloads work as expected. Some mirrors are not synched yet, but others
work fine.
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 13:01
>An: Log4NET Dev
>Cc: general@logging.apache.org
>Betreff: [RESULT] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
>
>With three +1 by Dominik, Christian and myself and no other votes the
>release has been accepted.
>
>I've already copied the distribution archives and will now proceed with
>the rest of the release process. I'll change the site to reflect the
>new release immediately but will hold off sending out the announce email
>for a bit longer.
>
>Thanks to all who took the time to review the release
>
> Stefan
[RESULT] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
With three +1 by Dominik, Christian and myself and no other votes the
release has been accepted.
I've already copied the distribution archives and will now proceed with
the rest of the release process. I'll change the site to reflect the
new release immediately but will hold off sending out the announce email
for a bit longer.
Thanks to all who took the time to review the release
Stefan
AW: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
Yay, you found the time!
I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
glance I found these issues on the web page:
* the download page is broken
* the SDK reference is broken
* Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this
intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those
frameworks have to be built from source?
Cheers
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Montag, 9. September 2013 15:11
>An: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; general@logging.apache.org
>Betreff: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
>
>Hi all,
>
>after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release.
>
>log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 2850)
>
>Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-
>notes.html
>
>I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt.
>
>The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1
> (revision 1520872)
>
>Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
>RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html
>
>Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep
>2013
>
>[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>[ ] +0 OK, but...
>[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>Thanks!
>
> Stefan
AW: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 06:08
>An: Log4NET Dev
>Cc: general@logging.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
>
>I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release.
>
>On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>> A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK
TOC
>> on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
>> entire vertical space:
>> Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu?
>
>Looks fine in Firefox - and even if it didn't, I'm not sure we'd have
>enough influence on the generated HTML anyway :-)
True ;-)
AW: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 06:08
>An: Log4NET Dev
>Cc: general@logging.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
>
>I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release.
>
>On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>> A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK
TOC
>> on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
>> entire vertical space:
>> Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu?
>
>Looks fine in Firefox - and even if it didn't, I'm not sure we'd have
>enough influence on the generated HTML anyway :-)
True ;-)
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release.
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC
> on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
> entire vertical space:
> Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu?
Looks fine in Firefox - and even if it didn't, I'm not sure we'd have
enough influence on the generated HTML anyway :-)
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release.
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC
> on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
> entire vertical space:
> Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu?
Looks fine in Firefox - and even if it didn't, I'm not sure we'd have
enough influence on the generated HTML anyway :-)
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
Looks good. The SDK reference now is even in the correct encoding.
+1 from me
A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC
on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
entire vertical space:
Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu?
Cheers
On 09/09/2013 06:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>> I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
>> glance I found these issues on the web page:
>> * the download page is broken
> I should have said so. Yes, this is to be expected as I must not run
> CGIs from my homedir.
>
>> * the SDK reference is broken
> Ah, good catch, fixed.
>
>> * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this
>> intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those
>> frameworks have to be built from source?
> I've stated it in the release notes where I did the same when we dropped
> CF 1.0 in 1.2.11 (BTW, there is a build for .NET 1.0).
>
> Anyway, we can fix the site whenever we feel like it, independent of any
> release.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
Looks good. The SDK reference now is even in the correct encoding.
+1 from me
A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC
on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
entire vertical space:
Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu?
Cheers
On 09/09/2013 06:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>> I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
>> glance I found these issues on the web page:
>> * the download page is broken
> I should have said so. Yes, this is to be expected as I must not run
> CGIs from my homedir.
>
>> * the SDK reference is broken
> Ah, good catch, fixed.
>
>> * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this
>> intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those
>> frameworks have to be built from source?
> I've stated it in the release notes where I did the same when we dropped
> CF 1.0 in 1.2.11 (BTW, there is a build for .NET 1.0).
>
> Anyway, we can fix the site whenever we feel like it, independent of any
> release.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
> glance I found these issues on the web page:
> * the download page is broken
I should have said so. Yes, this is to be expected as I must not run
CGIs from my homedir.
> * the SDK reference is broken
Ah, good catch, fixed.
> * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this
> intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those
> frameworks have to be built from source?
I've stated it in the release notes where I did the same when we dropped
CF 1.0 in 1.2.11 (BTW, there is a build for .NET 1.0).
Anyway, we can fix the site whenever we feel like it, independent of any
release.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
> glance I found these issues on the web page:
> * the download page is broken
I should have said so. Yes, this is to be expected as I must not run
CGIs from my homedir.
> * the SDK reference is broken
Ah, good catch, fixed.
> * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this
> intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those
> frameworks have to be built from source?
I've stated it in the release notes where I did the same when we dropped
CF 1.0 in 1.2.11 (BTW, there is a build for .NET 1.0).
Anyway, we can fix the site whenever we feel like it, independent of any
release.
Cheers
Stefan
AW: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
Yay, you found the time!
I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
glance I found these issues on the web page:
* the download page is broken
* the SDK reference is broken
* Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this
intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those
frameworks have to be built from source?
Cheers
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Montag, 9. September 2013 15:11
>An: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; general@logging.apache.org
>Betreff: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
>
>Hi all,
>
>after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release.
>
>log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 2850)
>
>Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-
>notes.html
>
>I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt.
>
>The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1
> (revision 1520872)
>
>Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
>RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html
>
>Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep
>2013
>
>[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>[ ] +0 OK, but...
>[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>Thanks!
>
> Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-09-10, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1
> I did the usual checks but due to a different OS I am not able to run
> the tests (without lot of efforts :-)).
Thanks :-)
> Please note, teh Apache Rat 0.10 looks a bit different than the one below.
> Unapproved licenses:
> log4net-1.2.12/log4net.snk.readme
> log4net-1.2.12/tests/lib/prerequisites.txt
both are simple readmes and are likely to get excluded from the report -
I'll look into it post-release.
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1
I did the usual checks but due to a different OS I am not able to run
the tests (without lot of efforts :-)).
Please note, teh Apache Rat 0.10 looks a bit different than the one below.
Unapproved licenses:
log4net-1.2.12/log4net.snk.readme
log4net-1.2.12/tests/lib/prerequisites.txt
I do not consider this a blocker, but you may want to run the report
manually again or update the plugin.
Cheers!
Christian
Am 09.09.13 15:11, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
> Hi all,
>
> after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release.
>
> log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 2850)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>
> I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt.
>
> The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1
> (revision 1520872)
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html
>
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep
> 2013
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stefan
[RESULT] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
With three +1 by Dominik, Christian and myself and no other votes the
release has been accepted.
I've already copied the distribution archives and will now proceed with
the rest of the release process. I'll change the site to reflect the
new release immediately but will hold off sending out the announce email
for a bit longer.
Thanks to all who took the time to review the release
Stefan