You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Marc Guillemot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/16 06:38:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SUREFIRE-1822) XML report with empty name attribute by 3.0.0-M5 when failing in @BeforeAll/@BeforeClass

Marc Guillemot created SUREFIRE-1822:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: XML report with empty name attribute by 3.0.0-M5 when failing in @BeforeAll/@BeforeClass
                 Key: SUREFIRE-1822
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1822
             Project: Maven Surefire
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Maven Surefire Plugin, xml generation
    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-M5
            Reporter: Marc Guillemot


If a JUnit test fails in @BeforeAll (or a JUnit 4 test in @BeforeClass), then Surefire reports it correctly on the console and fails the build (what was not the case with 3.0.0-M4 with @BeforeAll) *but the testcase name attribute in the XML report is now empty*:

Example:
{code:java}
  <testcase name="" classname="test.TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll" time="0.017">
    <failure type="org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError"><![CDATA[org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Failure in @BeforeAll method
        at test.TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll.setup(TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll.java:14)
]]></failure>
    <system-out><![CDATA[In setup...
]]></system-out>
  </testcase>
{code}
As a reference, Surefire 2.2 writes the same content in the classname and name attributes:
{code:java}
  <testcase name="test.TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll" classname="test.TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll" time="0.016">
    <failure message="Failure in @BeforeAll method" type="org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError">org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Failure in @BeforeAll method
        at test.TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll.setup(TestJUnit5FailingInBeforeAll.java:14)
</failure>
    <system-out><![CDATA[In setup...
]]></system-out>
  </testcase>
{code}
It is not really wrong to consider that the testcase node has no name here but it would be a change compared to prior versions that other systems need to handle (Jenkins for instance doesn't display the report correctly in this case).

Bug or feature? If this considered as a bug, I can try to provide a patch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)