Re: update website javadocs

[Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>]

Sorry for the delay, I tried it and it seems to be similar for me, it
seems the results hugely depend on the actual version of Java that is
used. Do we have a "defined" version that we use?

Dominik.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Nick / Dominik,
>
> I'm having problems with the javadocs website update, there are again a lot of differences (line breaks and others).
> Would you please generate the javadocs for the 3.13-beta1 tag on your linux box
> and commit them.
> I'm currently generating/updating the other docs, so javadocs are sufficient.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Andi
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org

Re: update website javadocs

[Nick Burch <ap...@gagravarr.org>]

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, Andreas Beeker wrote:
> please update the javadocs for 3.13 again. I've used the unofficial 
> windows openjdk 1.7 and it shuffles the javadocs, too.

Just tried, and it says that there are no changes, so I think we're all 
good!

Thanks
Nick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org

Re: update website javadocs

[Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>]

Hi Nick / Dominik,

please update the javadocs for 3.13 again.
I've used the unofficial windows openjdk 1.7 and it shuffles the javadocs, too.

Thank you ... and have fun at the con.

Andi.

On 10.08.2015 10:39, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Ok, yes, with openjdk-7 I get very similar results to previous runs.
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Nick Burch <ap...@gagravarr.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Dominik Stadler wrote:
>>> Sorry for the delay, I tried it and it seems to be similar for me, it
>>> seems the results hugely depend on the actual version of Java that is
>>> used. Do we have a "defined" version that we use?
>>
>> I think some projects get round it by having one of the build machines
>> always do it. Others don't publish javadocs except during a release. Most
>> curse Sun/Oracle every time, for their failure to think about this sort of
>> thing in the javadoc spec/testing...
>>
>> I'm using OpenJDK 1.7 on linux, seems fairly stable between machines. (While
>> POI is happy on 1.6, Tika has moved to 1.7, so I've changed my default dev
>> jvm. The javadoc tool on OpenJDK 1.7 seems quite a bit faster than OpenJDK
>> 1.6, which helps!)
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org

Re: update website javadocs

[Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>]

Ok, yes, with openjdk-7 I get very similar results to previous runs.

Dominik.

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Nick Burch <ap...@gagravarr.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Dominik Stadler wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, I tried it and it seems to be similar for me, it
>> seems the results hugely depend on the actual version of Java that is
>> used. Do we have a "defined" version that we use?
>
>
> I think some projects get round it by having one of the build machines
> always do it. Others don't publish javadocs except during a release. Most
> curse Sun/Oracle every time, for their failure to think about this sort of
> thing in the javadoc spec/testing...
>
> I'm using OpenJDK 1.7 on linux, seems fairly stable between machines. (While
> POI is happy on 1.6, Tika has moved to 1.7, so I've changed my default dev
> jvm. The javadoc tool on OpenJDK 1.7 seems quite a bit faster than OpenJDK
> 1.6, which helps!)
>
> Nick
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org

Re: update website javadocs

[Nick Burch <ap...@gagravarr.org>]

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I tried it and it seems to be similar for me, it
> seems the results hugely depend on the actual version of Java that is
> used. Do we have a "defined" version that we use?

I think some projects get round it by having one of the build machines 
always do it. Others don't publish javadocs except during a release. Most 
curse Sun/Oracle every time, for their failure to think about this sort of 
thing in the javadoc spec/testing...

I'm using OpenJDK 1.7 on linux, seems fairly stable between machines. 
(While POI is happy on 1.6, Tika has moved to 1.7, so I've changed my 
default dev jvm. The javadoc tool on OpenJDK 1.7 seems quite a bit faster 
than OpenJDK 1.6, which helps!)

Nick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org