You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@beam.apache.org by "Brian Hulette (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/09/20 19:47:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (BEAM-12914) Trivial Type Inference Fails On Lambda Functions in Python 3.9

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17417796#comment-17417796 ] 

Brian Hulette commented on BEAM-12914:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for the detailed report! Marking this as blocking BEAM-12000

> Trivial Type Inference Fails On Lambda Functions in Python 3.9
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-12914
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12914
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sdk-py-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.32.0
>         Environment: Python 3.9.7
> Linux Mint 20.2, Kernel: 5.4.0-84-generic
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hourany
>            Priority: P2
>
> The order and/or type of opcodes used to build lambda functions have changed in Python 3.9 (see example below). This causes the any test that relies on `trivial_inference.infer_return_type` to fail because the function returns a default of `Any` in cases where the type should normally be inferable. Tests cases that fail include:
>  * [testBuildListUnpack|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/8072cc0bcfd4eee08a95902e13b9bf1dc2338693/sdks/python/apache_beam/typehints/trivial_inference_test.py#L39] 
>  * [testBuildTupleUnpack|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/8072cc0bcfd4eee08a95902e13b9bf1dc2338693/sdks/python/apache_beam/typehints/trivial_inference_test.py#L45]
>  * [testBuildTupleUnpackWithCall|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/8072cc0bcfd4eee08a95902e13b9bf1dc2338693/sdks/python/apache_beam/typehints/trivial_inference_test.py#L305]
>  * [test_pardo_type_inference|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/8072cc0bcfd4eee08a95902e13b9bf1dc2338693/sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/ptransform_test.py#L2540]
> Test failure messages are all variations of:
> {noformat}
> ./sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/ptransform_test.py::PTransformTypeCheckTestCase::test_pardo_type_inference Failed: [undefined]AssertionError: <class 'int'> != Any
> ./sdks/python/apache_beam/typehints/trivial_inference_test.py::TrivialInferenceTest::testBuildListUnpack Failed: [undefined]AssertionError: List[int] != Any
> {noformat}
> etc
> h3. Example
> {code:python}
> # Python3.7
> In [1]: from dis import dis
> In [2]: from apache_beam.typehints import typehints
> In [3]: beam_type_hints = [typehints.List[int]]
> In [4]: dis(lambda _list: [*_list, *_list, *_list](beam_type_hints))
>   1           0 LOAD_FAST                0 (_list)
>               2 LOAD_FAST                0 (_list)
>               4 LOAD_FAST                0 (_list)
>               6 BUILD_LIST_UNPACK        3
>               8 LOAD_GLOBAL              0 (beam_type_hints)
>              10 CALL_FUNCTION            1
>              12 RETURN_VALUE
> {code}
> ----
> Whereas in Python 3.9
> {code:python}
> # Python 3.9
> In [1]: from dis import dis
> In [2]: from apache_beam.typehints import typehints
> In [3]: beam_type_hints = [typehints.List[int]]
> In [4]: dis(lambda _list: [*_list, *_list, *_list](beam_type_hints))
> <>:1: SyntaxWarning: 'list' object is not callable; perhaps you missed a comma?
> <ipython-input-4-6499114c3d61>:1: SyntaxWarning: 'list' object is not callable; perhaps you missed a comma?
>   dis(lambda _list: [*_list, *_list, *_list](beam_type_hints))
>   1           0 BUILD_LIST               0
>               2 LOAD_FAST                0 (_list)
>               4 LIST_EXTEND              1
>               6 LOAD_FAST                0 (_list)
>               8 LIST_EXTEND              1
>              10 LOAD_FAST                0 (_list)
>              12 LIST_EXTEND              1
>              14 LOAD_GLOBAL              0 (beam_type_hints)
>              16 CALL_FUNCTION            1
>              18 RETURN_VALUE
> {code}
> The `SyntaxWarning` is most likely raising because enhancment in [bpo-15248|https://bugs.python.org/issue15248] misses the fact that the lambda expression is a function, not a list we're calling, and isn't relevant to the issue.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)