[jira] [Resolved] (GROOVY-11610) Inner records are marked static in bytecode but are not recognized as static during compile

["Eric Milles (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Eric Milles resolved GROOVY-11610.
----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 4.0.27
       Resolution: Fixed

> Inner records are marked static in bytecode but are not recognized as static during compile
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11610
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11610
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Compiler, Static compilation
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.24
>            Reporter: Saravanan
>            Assignee: Eric Milles
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 4.0.27
>
>
> Nested record definitions are static by default in Java, but groovy treats them differently. The byte code generated respects this definition, but constructing the record in a groovy script creates a compile error (In static compilation)
> {code:java}
> Cannot find matching constructor com.Records.RecordTesting$MyRecord(com.Records.RecordTesting, java.lang.String). Please check if the declared type is correct and if the method exists{code}
>  
> {code:java}
> package com.Records;
> public class RecordTesting {
>     // This is static in the bytecode (which is correct behavior)
>     public record MyRecord(String blah) {}
>     public String create() {
>         // This will cause a compile error (unless MyRecord was marked static)
>         new MyRecord("blah").blah();
>     }
> }
>  {code}
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)