You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Levan Dvalishvili <dv...@verticali.com> on 2006/10/24 20:26:50 UTC
RE: Struts 2.0 vs JSF
I agree, JSF is not the most pleasing technologies out there, :)) I would
say Tapestry or wicket are way beyond, better, , but I dont like component
based event-driven blablalba.. so my vote is for struts 2.0, actually Struts
1.3.5 as a fact .... I am still little bit fishy about new dependency
injection ways that struts 2.0 got ...
Levan Dvalishvili
Support Lead US
Verticali,Inc
(646) 736 - 6075
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Duffy [mailto:mduffy_lists@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:57 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Struts 2.0 vs JSF
I just finished a JSF project and I was not pleased with "ease of use" or
the overhead (is JSF a conspiracy to sell hardware?).
I am thinking that the best way to go for a new commercial level project is
Struts 2.0 with AJAX components for a "coolness factor".
Any suggestions?
Mike
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org