You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org by "Wyatt, Allen" <Al...@travelocity.com> on 2006/02/03 18:19:11 UTC
Who uses JCS
Someone at my company made a remark in an email questioning "the future
of JCS - since no one else in the wild uses it". I'm not sure where he
got his information. Do we have a web page somewhere listing companies
that use JCS internally? I would guess not. Any rough idea how widely
it is used?
Re: Who uses JCS
Posted by Alistair Forbes <fo...@googlemail.com>.
I have the same feeling, which I think is unfortunate.
After looking at many open-source caching products, JCS seems to have the
all the right featues, but just feels dead. I have not benchmarked or stress
tested JCS, but for features things look good.
Personally I think it's the web site which offer no news, no benchmarks, no
links to reviews, no requirements for developers to get involved, no easy to
use getting started guide, etc.
I would be interested to hear what others think - is there something
fundamentally wrong with JCS? Aaron seems to be great at answering
questions, and maybe there are no problems. I suspect there are some
problems but there is no FAQ or Wiki so everyone runs into the same problems
- for example I saw an email which suggested that the JGroups config was
buggy and best avoid, but I guess many people repeat the same tests and
after wasting time gave up.
I would be especially interested to hear any success stories on
distributed/remote caches.
On 2/3/06, Wyatt, Allen <Al...@travelocity.com> wrote:
>
> Someone at my company made a remark in an email questioning "the future
> of JCS - since no one else in the wild uses it". I'm not sure where he
> got his information. Do we have a web page somewhere listing companies
> that use JCS internally? I would guess not. Any rough idea how widely
> it is used?
>
>