You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by rh...@apache.org on 2012/06/02 13:00:56 UTC

svn commit: r1345483 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Author: rhuijben
Date: Sat Jun  2 11:00:56 2012
New Revision: 1345483

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345483&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Nominate r1345482

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1345483&r1=1345482&r2=1345483&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Sat Jun  2 11:00:56 2012
@@ -133,6 +133,14 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: rhuijben
 
+ * r1345482
+   Resolve a theoretical assertion when upgrading, in case the working copy
+   contains tree conflicts with a url that is not canonical in 1.7+.
+   Justification:
+     Upgrading should be painless.
+   Votes:
+     +1: rhuijben
+
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================

Re: svn commit: r1345483 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.

Tablet says +1 if somebody beats me to the file...
On Jun 2, 2012 7:01 AM, <rh...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Sat Jun  2 11:00:56 2012
> New Revision: 1345483
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345483&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Nominate r1345482
>
> Modified:
>    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1345483&r1=1345482&r2=1345483&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Sat Jun  2 11:00:56 2012
> @@ -133,6 +133,14 @@ Candidate changes:
>    Votes:
>      +1: rhuijben
>
> + * r1345482
> +   Resolve a theoretical assertion when upgrading, in case the working
> copy
> +   contains tree conflicts with a url that is not canonical in 1.7+.
> +   Justification:
> +     Upgrading should be painless.
> +   Votes:
> +     +1: rhuijben
> +
>  Veto-blocked changes:
>  =====================
>
>
>
>