You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Alex Parvulescu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/16 14:43:04 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence
format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012495#comment-16012495 ]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-6225:
--------------------------------------
[~reschke], this is pretty close to your comment on the structure change on OAK-3933. I'd appreciate your comments on the patch!
> Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6225
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch
>
>
> As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence format for the GroupImpl members.
> Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of the key so it can be used for lookup.
> WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single one to reduce the noise.
> fyi [~anchela]
> [0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)