You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2012/06/18 10:08:49 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Hi all,
Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
framework without breaking something else.
That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
able to easily extend it.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Sorry for the noise, my e-mail client sent the message three times :/
Regards
JB
On 06/18/2012 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>
> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
> "fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
> framework without breaking something else.
>
> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
> paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
> able to easily extend it.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
yeah, +1 from my side.
2012/6/18 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
>> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>>
>> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are "fragile"
>> and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi framework without
>> breaking something else.
>>
>> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam-karaf
>> (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able to easily
>> extend it.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
> http://fusesource.com
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
big +1 from my side too; will make it also easier to write itests for
trunk and 2.3.x (only changing the namespace)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> JB, I was about to bring this proposal forward myself!
>
> A huge +1.
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
JB, I was about to bring this proposal forward myself!
A huge +1.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good to me.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>
> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are "fragile"
> and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi framework without
> breaking something else.
>
> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam-karaf
> (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able to easily
> extend it.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
+1,
using the paxexam-karaf can speed up the test process.
On 6/18/12 4:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>
> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
> "fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
> framework without breaking something else.
>
> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
> paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
> able to easily extend it.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang