Re: Maven, Gump and Blocks

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>]

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Studied the question a little bit more. There is a Maven1 plugin for
> creating gump.xml from POMs
> http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/gump/, no port to m2 yet
> though. The plugin is written in Jelly while m2 plugins are written in
> Java so it takes some work to port it.
> 
According to the maven plugin matrix, a gump module is not planned for
m2 - the maven advice is to use continuum....
I think gump is a great thing and it helps a lot, but I think also that
getting gump using m2 projects is not our concern. This is something the
maven and gump guys can do.

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Re: Maven, Gump and Blocks

[Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
...
> Now, we could for example use continuum - whatever that means...
> But perhaps pushing gump and maven a little bit could help.

http://wiki.apache.org/gump/GumpAndMaven

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Maven, Gump and Blocks

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>]

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> 
> Why is that, I thought the Maven community had stopped being against Gump.
> 
Don't ask me, ask the maven community :) I just looked at this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+Matrix

> 
>>I think gump is a great thing and it helps a lot, but I think also that
>>getting gump using m2 projects is not our concern.
>>
> 
> I would like to agree, but it seem to imply that we are going to mean 
> that we will be without continuous integration until someone else takes 
> care about it. I doubt that we can afford that in the long term.
> 
Now, we could for example use continuum - whatever that means...
But perhaps pushing gump and maven a little bit could help.

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Re: Maven, Gump and Blocks

[Daniel Fagerstrom <da...@nada.kth.se>]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

>Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>  
>
>>Studied the question a little bit more. There is a Maven1 plugin for
>>creating gump.xml from POMs
>>http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/gump/, no port to m2 yet
>>though. The plugin is written in Jelly while m2 plugins are written in
>>Java so it takes some work to port it.
>>
>>    
>>
>According to the maven plugin matrix, a gump module is not planned for
>m2 - the maven advice is to use continuum....
>  
>
Why is that, I thought the Maven community had stopped being against Gump.

>I think gump is a great thing and it helps a lot, but I think also that
>getting gump using m2 projects is not our concern.
>
I would like to agree, but it seem to imply that we are going to mean 
that we will be without continuous integration until someone else takes 
care about it. I doubt that we can afford that in the long term.

>This is something the
>maven and gump guys can do.
>  
>
Your answer above seem to indicate that the Maven guys not are going to 
do it, are there any plans for m2 support from the Gump camp?

/Daniel