You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/12/07 20:56:23 UTC

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2292) Investigate unused targetConfigId parameter in EJB refs

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2292?page=all ]

David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2292:
-----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: Wish List
                       (was: 1.1.2)

> Investigate unused targetConfigId parameter in EJB refs
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-2292
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2292
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: deployment, OpenEJB
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>         Assigned To: David Jencks
>             Fix For: Wish List
>
>
> In OpenEJBReferenceBuilder:
> createEJBLocalRef and createEJBRemoteRef accept a targetConfigId argument.
> Then they often call getMatch or getImplicitMatch and don't use the targetConfigId.  As a result, the current module's ID is always used as the targetConfigId:
> context.findGBeans(new AbstractNameQuery(context.getId(), ...
> This means that the query will never match EJBs in a parent of the current configuration.  It should be changed to use the targetConfigId instead of the current module's ID.
> This does not come up if a pattern element is used in the mapping, though that mapping strategy runs into a different 1.1 bug (ClassCastException on org.openejb.proxy.ProxyInfo)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira