You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2012/10/03 21:34:33 UTC
[VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Hi all,
I submit a new ServiceMix Bundles release to your vote.
This release includes the following bundles:
- abdera-parser 1.1.2_1
- automaton 1.11-8_1
- commons-configuration 1.8_1
- derby 10.8.1.2_1
- derby 10.8.2.2_1
- derbynet 10.8.1.2_2
- derbynet 10.8.2.2_2
- elasticsearch 0.19.9_1
- fop 1.0_3
- gae 1.6.6_2
- gae 1.7.1_2
- gentlyweb-utils 1.5_1
- saxon 9.4.0.1_3
- saxon 9.4.0.4_1
- struts 1.3.10_1
- velocity 1.7_5
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit a new ServiceMix Bundles release to your vote.
>
> This release includes the following bundles:
> - abdera-parser 1.1.2_1
> - automaton 1.11-8_1
> - commons-configuration 1.8_1
> - derby 10.8.1.2_1
> - derby 10.8.2.2_1
> - derbynet 10.8.1.2_2
> - derbynet 10.8.2.2_2
> - elasticsearch 0.19.9_1
> - fop 1.0_3
> - gae 1.6.6_2
> - gae 1.7.1_2
> - gentlyweb-utils 1.5_1
> - saxon 9.4.0.1_3
> - saxon 9.4.0.4_1
> - struts 1.3.10_1
> - velocity 1.7_5
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Agree with Babak,
I cancel this release, fix and create a new one.
I will submit it to your vote tomorrow morning.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 10/04/2012 02:20 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
> Hi
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> I'm concerned about the following ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1233
>
> The provided bundle
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.elasticsearch/0.19.9_1/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.elasticsearch-0.19.9_1.jar
>
> lacks the content of the following folders available inside the original JAR
> on the central Repo:
>
> elasticsearch-0.19.9.jar!config
> elasticsearch-0.19.9.jar!org/apache/lucene
>
> This is similar to the issues being already known by other bundles of Saxon
> or FOP.
>
> In the meanwhile the version 0.19.10 is already out (since October 1st) and
> it would be great to provide a bundle for this as well in case you would
> decide to cancel this vote.
>
>
> http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.elasticsearch%22%20AND%20a%3A%22elasticsearch%22
>
> I've already raised a ticket for this:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1260
>
> Babak
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714627.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
Awesome, that was exactly what I was looking for, embed as a private-package
inside the bundle itself.
BTW your previous response didn't sound to intend to go for a
private-package approach :-)
Thanks!
Babak
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714636.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
As I said before, even if I think it's ugly, I will ship elasticsearch
lucene package in the bundle (as a private-package).
The lucene dependence will be removed from the camel feature.
Regards
JB
On 10/04/2012 03:49 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
> In fact looking at the camel-elasticsearch feature:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/platforms/karaf/features/src/main/resources/features.xml
>
> I see a bundle dependency to "org.apache.servicemix.bundles.lucene" version
> 3.6.0_1
>
> However I've got no idea HOW/WHO found it out to be the PERFECT match (BTW
> this feature came through CAMEL-5219).
>
> I don't even see how the usage of the OSGi version range can resolve this,
> let's say [X,X+Y). To my understanding the "perfect" solution would be to
> use/load the exact Class Bytecode of Apache Lucene being embedded inside the
> provided JAR @ central repo. However I've got no idea how OSGi world could
> provide this :-)
>
> All in one in case the elasticsearch bundle would NOT work properly out of
> the box just because the Apache Lucene being loaded @ OSGi runtime is not
> compatible (even through the usage of a range as you proposed) then who
> would be "guilty" one? I would say both elasticsearch as well as Apache
> Lucene folks would say:
>
> "We never claimed to be OSGi-compatible! In fact it was Apache ServiceMix
> providing some OSGi-Bundles through some OSGi-range hypothesis & magics".
>
> Please excuse me if my answer appears blunt.
>
> Babak
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714633.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
By the way, we have quite the same for MOST OF bundles: we try to define
a version range (or sticky version).
Regards
JB
On 10/04/2012 03:49 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
> In fact looking at the camel-elasticsearch feature:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/platforms/karaf/features/src/main/resources/features.xml
>
> I see a bundle dependency to "org.apache.servicemix.bundles.lucene" version
> 3.6.0_1
>
> However I've got no idea HOW/WHO found it out to be the PERFECT match (BTW
> this feature came through CAMEL-5219).
>
> I don't even see how the usage of the OSGi version range can resolve this,
> let's say [X,X+Y). To my understanding the "perfect" solution would be to
> use/load the exact Class Bytecode of Apache Lucene being embedded inside the
> provided JAR @ central repo. However I've got no idea how OSGi world could
> provide this :-)
>
> All in one in case the elasticsearch bundle would NOT work properly out of
> the box just because the Apache Lucene being loaded @ OSGi runtime is not
> compatible (even through the usage of a range as you proposed) then who
> would be "guilty" one? I would say both elasticsearch as well as Apache
> Lucene folks would say:
>
> "We never claimed to be OSGi-compatible! In fact it was Apache ServiceMix
> providing some OSGi-Bundles through some OSGi-range hypothesis & magics".
>
> Please excuse me if my answer appears blunt.
>
> Babak
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714633.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
In fact looking at the camel-elasticsearch feature:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/platforms/karaf/features/src/main/resources/features.xml
I see a bundle dependency to "org.apache.servicemix.bundles.lucene" version
3.6.0_1
However I've got no idea HOW/WHO found it out to be the PERFECT match (BTW
this feature came through CAMEL-5219).
I don't even see how the usage of the OSGi version range can resolve this,
let's say [X,X+Y). To my understanding the "perfect" solution would be to
use/load the exact Class Bytecode of Apache Lucene being embedded inside the
provided JAR @ central repo. However I've got no idea how OSGi world could
provide this :-)
All in one in case the elasticsearch bundle would NOT work properly out of
the box just because the Apache Lucene being loaded @ OSGi runtime is not
compatible (even through the usage of a range as you proposed) then who
would be "guilty" one? I would say both elasticsearch as well as Apache
Lucene folks would say:
"We never claimed to be OSGi-compatible! In fact it was Apache ServiceMix
providing some OSGi-Bundles through some OSGi-range hypothesis & magics".
Please excuse me if my answer appears blunt.
Babak
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714633.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Agree for the names.txt, I will include it in the bundle.
About lucene, it's the responsibility of the feature to install lucene
bundle. About the version, I can add a version range in the
elasticsearch bundle to be sure to use a working lucene version.
Another way (it's the one that I will adopt regarding your comment) is
the embed the lucene package in the elasticsearch bundle as a private
package.
Regards
JB
On 10/04/2012 02:55 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here you see the history of that file, however I don't know how important
> that file is, e.g. would camel-elasticsearch stop working inside Karaf, etc
> if that file is missing, I don't know. That said to me it's too risky...
>
> https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/commits/master/src/main/resources/config/names.txt
>
> And one question though regarding the missing org/apache/lucene folder (be
> warned as I'v got ZERO knowledge of the OSGi stuff). How do we
> know/guarantee that the Apache Lucene version being imported and available
> at OSGi runtime (e.g. Felix, Equinox, etc.) has the CORRECT/MATCHING version
> being required by elasticsearch and that it would make elasticsearch work
> properly out of the box?
>
> To be more precise, assume the folks @ elasticsearch have intensively tested
> and released the version 0.19.9 with the Apache Lucene let's say version X.
> Then @ OSGi Runtime the Version X+1 is the one which is available and gets
> loaded into the VM through another bundle being installed & active. However
> the X+1 has a change in it making it not binary-compatible with the expected
> version X by elasticsearch 0.19.9 which on it's turn has been intensively
> tested and verified with Apache Lucene version X embedded inside the JAR!
> What happens then?
>
> Babak
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714631.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
Hi
Here you see the history of that file, however I don't know how important
that file is, e.g. would camel-elasticsearch stop working inside Karaf, etc
if that file is missing, I don't know. That said to me it's too risky...
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/commits/master/src/main/resources/config/names.txt
And one question though regarding the missing org/apache/lucene folder (be
warned as I'v got ZERO knowledge of the OSGi stuff). How do we
know/guarantee that the Apache Lucene version being imported and available
at OSGi runtime (e.g. Felix, Equinox, etc.) has the CORRECT/MATCHING version
being required by elasticsearch and that it would make elasticsearch work
properly out of the box?
To be more precise, assume the folks @ elasticsearch have intensively tested
and released the version 0.19.9 with the Apache Lucene let's say version X.
Then @ OSGi Runtime the Version X+1 is the one which is available and gets
loaded into the VM through another bundle being installed & active. However
the X+1 has a change in it making it not binary-compatible with the expected
version X by elasticsearch 0.19.9 which on it's turn has been intensively
tested and verified with Apache Lucene version X embedded inside the JAR!
What happens then?
Babak
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714631.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
FYI, org.apache.lucene is in import package (so it's "normal" to be
excluded from the bundle), but I'm checking about config (if it contains
really config files).
Regards
JB
On 10/04/2012 02:20 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
> Hi
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> I'm concerned about the following ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1233
>
> The provided bundle
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.elasticsearch/0.19.9_1/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.elasticsearch-0.19.9_1.jar
>
> lacks the content of the following folders available inside the original JAR
> on the central Repo:
>
> elasticsearch-0.19.9.jar!config
> elasticsearch-0.19.9.jar!org/apache/lucene
>
> This is similar to the issues being already known by other bundles of Saxon
> or FOP.
>
> In the meanwhile the version 0.19.10 is already out (since October 1st) and
> it would be great to provide a bundle for this as well in case you would
> decide to cancel this vote.
>
>
> http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.elasticsearch%22%20AND%20a%3A%22elasticsearch%22
>
> I've already raised a ticket for this:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1260
>
> Babak
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714627.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
Hi
-1 (non-binding)
I'm concerned about the following ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1233
The provided bundle
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.elasticsearch/0.19.9_1/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.elasticsearch-0.19.9_1.jar
lacks the content of the following folders available inside the original JAR
on the central Repo:
elasticsearch-0.19.9.jar!config
elasticsearch-0.19.9.jar!org/apache/lucene
This is similar to the issues being already known by other bundles of Saxon
or FOP.
In the meanwhile the version 0.19.10 is already out (since October 1st) and
it would be great to provide a bundle for this as well in case you would
decide to cancel this vote.
http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.elasticsearch%22%20AND%20a%3A%22elasticsearch%22
I've already raised a ticket for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1260
Babak
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ServiceMix-Bundles-2012-10-03-release-tp5714621p5714627.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
downloading, unpacking, building for each artifact: check
validating signatures of src artifacts: check
testing as far as I use them in my projects: check
validating license/notice files: check
--> +1 (non-binding)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Oct 3, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I submit a new ServiceMix Bundles release to your vote.
>>
>> This release includes the following bundles:
>> - abdera-parser 1.1.2_1
>> - automaton 1.11-8_1
>> - commons-configuration 1.8_1
>> - derby 10.8.1.2_1
>> - derby 10.8.2.2_1
>> - derbynet 10.8.1.2_2
>> - derbynet 10.8.2.2_2
>> - elasticsearch 0.19.9_1
>> - fop 1.0_3
>> - gae 1.6.6_2
>> - gae 1.7.1_2
>> - gentlyweb-utils 1.5_1
>> - saxon 9.4.0.1_3
>> - saxon 9.4.0.4_1
>> - struts 1.3.10_1
>> - velocity 1.7_5
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ServiceMix Bundles 2012-10-03 release
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
+1
Dan
On Oct 3, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit a new ServiceMix Bundles release to your vote.
>
> This release includes the following bundles:
> - abdera-parser 1.1.2_1
> - automaton 1.11-8_1
> - commons-configuration 1.8_1
> - derby 10.8.1.2_1
> - derby 10.8.2.2_1
> - derbynet 10.8.1.2_2
> - derbynet 10.8.2.2_2
> - elasticsearch 0.19.9_1
> - fop 1.0_3
> - gae 1.6.6_2
> - gae 1.7.1_2
> - gentlyweb-utils 1.5_1
> - saxon 9.4.0.1_3
> - saxon 9.4.0.4_1
> - struts 1.3.10_1
> - velocity 1.7_5
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-086/
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com