You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> on 2012/01/15 10:11:01 UTC
[VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.2 (candidate 0)
Hi,
I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
Please download, test, and try it out:
http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
Thanks,
Daniel
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com>.
Since we find an issue in hadoop 23 test (PIG-2477), I will roll another
candidate.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi, Patrick,
> > Thanks for testing. Please set umask to 0022. It is a known issue and is
> > included in RELEASE_NOTES.
>
> Shoot, sorry about that. I looked at the readme and skipped the
> relnotes. After applying the umask I was able to run the test just
> fine. Thanks!
>
> Patrick
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi, Patrick,
> Thanks for testing. Please set umask to 0022. It is a known issue and is
> included in RELEASE_NOTES.
Shoot, sorry about that. I looked at the readme and skipped the
relnotes. After applying the umask I was able to run the test just
fine. Thanks!
Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com>.
Hi, Patrick,
Thanks for testing. Please set umask to 0022. It is a known issue and is
included in RELEASE_NOTES.
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, I'm seeing an issue on ubuntu, perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
> (I cleared my jar caches, no help)
>
> I'm able to run this fine with 0.9.1, however using this release
> candidate I see the following error:
>
> ant -Dtestcase=TestBuiltin clean test
>
> [junit] Running org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin
> [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
> [junit] Test org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin FAILED
>
> the interesting bit of the log is: (see attached for full log)
>
> 12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
> dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data1,
> expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
> 12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
> dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data2,
> expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
> 12/01/17 11:55:15 ERROR datanode.DataNode: All directories in
> dfs.data.dir are invalid.
>
> $uname -a
> Linux ubuntu 3.0.0-14-generic-pae #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 21 22:07:10
> UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> $ java -version
> java version "1.6.0_26"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > I checked the keys and signature of .rpm, .deb, and source release. I
> ran smoke tests in both local and cluster mode on the source release.
> >
> > One issue that we should clear up but that I don't believe blocks the
> tests is that there are a bunch (~100) 0 length .java files. These are
> files that were removed from the code base but ended up getting reset to
> zero length instead of svn rm'd (they're gone in trunk, which makes me
> thinks this resulted from a merge). I don't think we need to reroll over
> this. I'll post a patch for this in case there are future rc's or a 0.9.3.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
> >> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
> >>
> >> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build
> directory.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Daniel
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Hi, I'm seeing an issue on ubuntu, perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
(I cleared my jar caches, no help)
I'm able to run this fine with 0.9.1, however using this release
candidate I see the following error:
ant -Dtestcase=TestBuiltin clean test
[junit] Running org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
[junit] Test org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin FAILED
the interesting bit of the log is: (see attached for full log)
12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data1,
expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data2,
expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
12/01/17 11:55:15 ERROR datanode.DataNode: All directories in
dfs.data.dir are invalid.
$uname -a
Linux ubuntu 3.0.0-14-generic-pae #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 21 22:07:10
UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I checked the keys and signature of .rpm, .deb, and source release. I ran smoke tests in both local and cluster mode on the source release.
>
> One issue that we should clear up but that I don't believe blocks the tests is that there are a bunch (~100) 0 length .java files. These are files that were removed from the code base but ended up getting reset to zero length instead of svn rm'd (they're gone in trunk, which makes me thinks this resulted from a merge). I don't think we need to reroll over this. I'll post a patch for this in case there are future rc's or a 0.9.3.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
>> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>>
>> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>.
+1.
I checked the keys and signature of .rpm, .deb, and source release. I ran smoke tests in both local and cluster mode on the source release.
One issue that we should clear up but that I don't believe blocks the tests is that there are a bunch (~100) 0 length .java files. These are files that were removed from the code base but ended up getting reset to zero length instead of svn rm'd (they're gone in trunk, which makes me thinks this resulted from a merge). I don't think we need to reroll over this. I'll post a patch for this in case there are future rc's or a 0.9.3.
Alan.
On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>
> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel