You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ode.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/28 12:06:58 UTC
Ode JBI component changes
FYI, it seems the latest changes on the JBI component
(using sendSync mainly) caused some problems
on some of my configurations that used to work.
I will try to investigate the problem further and report
to this list...
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Ode JBI component changes
Posted by Manu Lopez <ml...@intecna.es>.
Now it works fine. Thanks !
Alex Boisvert wrote:
>
> Committed in r523347. Can you give it another shot?
>
> On 3/28/07, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I've been looking into this since Manu reported an issue on Monday.
>> I think it's due to the reuse of persistent objects (in this case the Ode
>> message exchange) across transactions. I realized only yesterday that I
>> had tested my changes only with in-memory processes.
>>
>> I'll commit a fix shortly.
>>
>> alex
>>
>> On 3/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > FYI, it seems the latest changes on the JBI component
>> > (using sendSync mainly) caused some problems
>> > on some of my configurations that used to work.
>> > I will try to investigate the problem further and report
>> > to this list...
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > ------------------------
>> > Architect, LogicBlaze ( http://www.logicblaze.com/)
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ode-JBI-component-changes-tf3479406.html#a9717352
Sent from the Apache Ode Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Ode JBI component changes
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
Committed in r523347. Can you give it another shot?
On 3/28/07, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I've been looking into this since Manu reported an issue on Monday.
> I think it's due to the reuse of persistent objects (in this case the Ode
> message exchange) across transactions. I realized only yesterday that I
> had tested my changes only with in-memory processes.
>
> I'll commit a fix shortly.
>
> alex
>
> On 3/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > FYI, it seems the latest changes on the JBI component
> > (using sendSync mainly) caused some problems
> > on some of my configurations that used to work.
> > I will try to investigate the problem further and report
> > to this list...
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Architect, LogicBlaze ( http://www.logicblaze.com/)
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
Re: Ode JBI component changes
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
Yes, I've been looking into this since Manu reported an issue on Monday. I
think it's due to the reuse of persistent objects (in this case the Ode
message exchange) across transactions. I realized only yesterday that I
had tested my changes only with in-memory processes.
I'll commit a fix shortly.
alex
On 3/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, it seems the latest changes on the JBI component
> (using sendSync mainly) caused some problems
> on some of my configurations that used to work.
> I will try to investigate the problem further and report
> to this list...
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>