You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by "Andrus Adamchik (JIRA)" <de...@cayenne.apache.org> on 2008/02/12 17:27:33 UTC
[JIRA] Created: (CAY-984) Runtime relationships leak into
CayenneModeler
Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
----------------------------------------------
Key: CAY-984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984
Project: Cayenne
Issue Type: Bug
Components: CayenneModeler GUI
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 3.0
This affects 3.0 M3 and causes lots of user confusion and potential modeling errors.... In *runtime* Cayenne creates missing reverse relationships to have a consistent mapping graph internally. This should be invisible to the Modeler... however it is not, as when a project is loaded, the "defaults" are applied and runtime relationships are shown to the user. Luckily they are not saved to XML , but the whole things is very confusing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Cool.
Yeah, there is definitely room to streamline there. I noticed a TODO not
for pushing the mvn assemblies through. Maybe a simple bash script there
would help?
Actually, a simple bash script for the whole process would likely help.
About the only thing that would need to be customized is the GPG key ID.
--
Kevin
On 2/12/08 1:38 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> I think the 4 - 6 week is a sweetspot.
>> As is, it takes us 2 - 3 weeks to get a release out the door. So
>> waiting
>> upwards of 10 + 3 seems like a really long time to me.
>
> So we are in agreement, as I really meant 10 - 3 (6-10 weeks as
> perceived by the users). As a side note, would be nice to cut down on
> the time we spend preparing the release. If we do it often enough, I
> suspect we'll have fewer issues with assemblies (something that I
> assume most of us are really testing vs. the testing actual framework
> code), so it is realistic to streamline the process.
>
> Andrus
>
Re: Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I think the 4 - 6 week is a sweetspot.
> As is, it takes us 2 - 3 weeks to get a release out the door. So
> waiting
> upwards of 10 + 3 seems like a really long time to me.
So we are in agreement, as I really meant 10 - 3 (6-10 weeks as
perceived by the users). As a side note, would be nice to cut down on
the time we spend preparing the release. If we do it often enough, I
suspect we'll have fewer issues with assemblies (something that I
assume most of us are really testing vs. the testing actual framework
code), so it is realistic to streamline the process.
Andrus
Re: Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
I guess it really depends on how critical you view the problem then. I'm
certainly not advocating a bi-weekly release schedule (I found out
first-hand how much of a pain it is to prepare), but likewise, I don't see
it being problematic to issue a quick fix to a critical problem. Arguably,
it's something that should have been caught in testing for the 3.0M3
release.
If it's not that critical, then waiting until the next release cycle
shouldn't be a problem. As for me, I think the 4 - 6 week is a sweetspot.
As is, it takes us 2 - 3 weeks to get a release out the door. So waiting
upwards of 10 + 3 seems like a really long time to me. Once again, I have
really high hopes that the CI server and/or Cayenne zone (any update on
this?) will help streamline the process.
--
Kevin
On 2/12/08 12:32 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> I agree except that posting releases every week will create a huge
> overhead for the the PMC to test it before the vote... There is a
> difference between a release and a nightly build in the expected
> quality, so we can't just let it out without some thorough testing. I
> suggest to start doing releases more often, but not *that* often. We
> can aim for a release every 6-10 weeks?
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> I know I'm stating the obvious, but there's nothing wrong with us
>> pushing
>> out a 3.0M4. This would have the benefit of working for everyone,
>> rather
>> than just those that happened to see your post.
>>
>> While not a ton has changed, there were some fairly important bug
>> fixes. I
>> think CAY-574, for example, could help out a lot of ROP users.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>> On 2/12/08 12:05 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI: I just fixed a nasty Modeler bug below that affected
>>> CayenneModeler 3.0M3. You can get a Mac and Windows versions of the
>>> patched Modeler following this link (consider it an unofficial
>>> nightly
>>> build) :
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/nightly/02122008/
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: "Andrus Adamchik (JIRA)" <de...@cayenne.apache.org>
>>>> Date: February 12, 2008 11:27:33 AM EST
>>>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>>> Subject: [JIRA] Created: (CAY-984) Runtime relationships leak into
>>>> CayenneModeler
>>>> Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Key: CAY-984
>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984
>>>> Project: Cayenne
>>>> Issue Type: Bug
>>>> Components: CayenneModeler GUI
>>>> Affects Versions: 3.0
>>>> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
>>>> Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
>>>> Priority: Critical
>>>> Fix For: 3.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This affects 3.0 M3 and causes lots of user confusion and potential
>>>> modeling errors.... In *runtime* Cayenne creates missing reverse
>>>> relationships to have a consistent mapping graph internally. This
>>>> should be invisible to the Modeler... however it is not, as when a
>>>> project is loaded, the "defaults" are applied and runtime
>>>> relationships are shown to the user. Luckily they are not saved to
>>>> XML , but the whole things is very confusing.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> -
>>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I agree except that posting releases every week will create a huge
overhead for the the PMC to test it before the vote... There is a
difference between a release and a nightly build in the expected
quality, so we can't just let it out without some thorough testing. I
suggest to start doing releases more often, but not *that* often. We
can aim for a release every 6-10 weeks?
Andrus
On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I know I'm stating the obvious, but there's nothing wrong with us
> pushing
> out a 3.0M4. This would have the benefit of working for everyone,
> rather
> than just those that happened to see your post.
>
> While not a ton has changed, there were some fairly important bug
> fixes. I
> think CAY-574, for example, could help out a lot of ROP users.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> On 2/12/08 12:05 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> FYI: I just fixed a nasty Modeler bug below that affected
>> CayenneModeler 3.0M3. You can get a Mac and Windows versions of the
>> patched Modeler following this link (consider it an unofficial
>> nightly
>> build) :
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/nightly/02122008/
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: "Andrus Adamchik (JIRA)" <de...@cayenne.apache.org>
>>> Date: February 12, 2008 11:27:33 AM EST
>>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>> Subject: [JIRA] Created: (CAY-984) Runtime relationships leak into
>>> CayenneModeler
>>> Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>>
>>> Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Key: CAY-984
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984
>>> Project: Cayenne
>>> Issue Type: Bug
>>> Components: CayenneModeler GUI
>>> Affects Versions: 3.0
>>> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
>>> Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
>>> Priority: Critical
>>> Fix For: 3.0
>>>
>>>
>>> This affects 3.0 M3 and causes lots of user confusion and potential
>>> modeling errors.... In *runtime* Cayenne creates missing reverse
>>> relationships to have a consistent mapping graph internally. This
>>> should be invisible to the Modeler... however it is not, as when a
>>> project is loaded, the "defaults" are applied and runtime
>>> relationships are shown to the user. Luckily they are not saved to
>>> XML , but the whole things is very confusing.
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> -
>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
I know I'm stating the obvious, but there's nothing wrong with us pushing
out a 3.0M4. This would have the benefit of working for everyone, rather
than just those that happened to see your post.
While not a ton has changed, there were some fairly important bug fixes. I
think CAY-574, for example, could help out a lot of ROP users.
--
Kevin
On 2/12/08 12:05 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> FYI: I just fixed a nasty Modeler bug below that affected
> CayenneModeler 3.0M3. You can get a Mac and Windows versions of the
> patched Modeler following this link (consider it an unofficial nightly
> build) :
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/nightly/02122008/
>
> Andrus
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Andrus Adamchik (JIRA)" <de...@cayenne.apache.org>
>> Date: February 12, 2008 11:27:33 AM EST
>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>> Subject: [JIRA] Created: (CAY-984) Runtime relationships leak into
>> CayenneModeler
>> Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>
>> Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: CAY-984
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984
>> Project: Cayenne
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: CayenneModeler GUI
>> Affects Versions: 3.0
>> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
>> Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
>> Priority: Critical
>> Fix For: 3.0
>>
>>
>> This affects 3.0 M3 and causes lots of user confusion and potential
>> modeling errors.... In *runtime* Cayenne creates missing reverse
>> relationships to have a consistent mapping graph internally. This
>> should be invisible to the Modeler... however it is not, as when a
>> project is loaded, the "defaults" are applied and runtime
>> relationships are shown to the user. Luckily they are not saved to
>> XML , but the whole things is very confusing.
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>
>>
>
Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
FYI: I just fixed a nasty Modeler bug below that affected
CayenneModeler 3.0M3. You can get a Mac and Windows versions of the
patched Modeler following this link (consider it an unofficial nightly
build) :
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/nightly/02122008/
Andrus
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Andrus Adamchik (JIRA)" <de...@cayenne.apache.org>
> Date: February 12, 2008 11:27:33 AM EST
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Subject: [JIRA] Created: (CAY-984) Runtime relationships leak into
> CayenneModeler
> Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>
> Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAY-984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984
> Project: Cayenne
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: CayenneModeler GUI
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
> Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> This affects 3.0 M3 and causes lots of user confusion and potential
> modeling errors.... In *runtime* Cayenne creates missing reverse
> relationships to have a consistent mapping graph internally. This
> should be invisible to the Modeler... however it is not, as when a
> project is loaded, the "defaults" are applied and runtime
> relationships are shown to the user. Luckily they are not saved to
> XML , but the whole things is very confusing.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
[JIRA] Closed: (CAY-984) Runtime relationships leak into
CayenneModeler
Posted by "Andrus Adamchik (JIRA)" <de...@cayenne.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrus Adamchik closed CAY-984.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAY-984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-984
> Project: Cayenne
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: CayenneModeler GUI
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
> Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> This affects 3.0 M3 and causes lots of user confusion and potential modeling errors.... In *runtime* Cayenne creates missing reverse relationships to have a consistent mapping graph internally. This should be invisible to the Modeler... however it is not, as when a project is loaded, the "defaults" are applied and runtime relationships are shown to the user. Luckily they are not saved to XML , but the whole things is very confusing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.