You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by enLogica <ne...@enlogica.com> on 2003/01/14 22:58:17 UTC

WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)

I am attempting to setup Tomcat 4.1 with Apache 2.0.4.  Per the instructions
in my book I am suppose to download the "Web Application Module" for Apache
in order to allow these two to talk, but it is not listed on
http://modules.apache.org/search.

With v.2.0 do I still need to download this mod?

If so, where can I find it?

Thanks.
Neal


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)

Posted by Peter Harrison <pe...@asterisk.co.nz>.

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:58, enLogica wrote:
> I am attempting to setup Tomcat 4.1 with Apache 2.0.4.  Per the
> instructions in my book I am suppose to download the "Web Application
> Module" for Apache in order to allow these two to talk, but it is not
> listed on
> http://modules.apache.org/search.

Perhaps:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/archives/v4.0.1/bin

I had problems finding it again when deploying against apache yesterday.

Regards,

Peter

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)

Posted by Thom Park <tp...@borland.com>.

On Windows, the WARP connector has threading issues - I believe that's 
the main reason why it's mentioned that on Windows it's not supported.

I wrote an IIOP module for Apache 1.3 using mod_webapp as a starting 
point and had to add quite a bit of mutex usage to stabilize the thing 
under windows. When I had to move to Apache 2.0, I re-wrote the thing - 
basing it on the architecture of mod_jk.

If you're working with apache 2.0 - most definitely go with mod_jk.

(IMHO...)
-Thom


Lajos Moczar wrote:

> One more point is that webapp is just plain buggy, while 
> tried-and-true mod_jk is quite reliable. If you are hosting anything 
> production-quality, I'd go with mod_jk every time.
>
> Lajos
>
>
> neal wrote:
>
>> For anyone interested I just confirmed via a book I bought from 
>> Borders that
>> WARP does not support Load balancing.  So, for the archives ... WARP 
>> (Via
>> the WebApp module) does not support:
>>
>> 1. Load balancing
>> 2. Apache 2.0 (at least with Windows)
>>
>> And contrary to the Apache's own WebApp module site, Windows *IS* 
>> supported
>> for 1.3.27 usage ... and its downloadable from the site.  Man, Apache 
>> should
>> really update this documentation ... I just waisted the majorty of a day
>> figuring this stuff out (anyone from apache listening out there??).  ;-)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: neal [mailto:nealcabage@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:58 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
>>
>>
>> Well, I re-installed an older version of Apache (1.3.27) and WARP via
>> mod_webApp seems to work fine now....and that was on Windows!  So, I 
>> guess
>> the compatability issue was with Apache 2.0.  Hmm.  That sucks.
>>
>> By the way, it was mentioned on this thread that mod_jk supports load
>> balancing.  Is that to say that WARP won't work in a multiple-host
>> scenario?!?!   :(
>>
>> Thanks
>> Neal
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: neal [mailto:nealcabage@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:04 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
>>
>>
>> Really?!?!
>>
>> But I downloaded it from the win32 archives on the apache site
>> (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/archives/v4.0.1/bin/win 
>>
>> 32/).  It even came with the libapr.dll - the library file compile as a
>> windows DLL.  Perhaps its just not compatible with Apache 2?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:38:55 -0800
>>> From: neal <ne...@yahoo.com>
>>> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>> To: Tomcat Users List <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>> Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
>>>
>>> This is totally screwey!
>>>
>>> Does WARP work on Windows or not?!?!
>>>
>>
>>
>> My understanding is "not".
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
"My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est 
Pro patria mori." -- Wilfred Owen (1893-1918)

http://www.etsu.edu/english/muse/owen.htm

-- 
Borland -- Enabling a new digital world where our customers
have the freedom of choice to develop, deploy, and integrate
applications across the enterprise and  the Internet.
http://www.borland.com

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only
for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain
legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you
are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>