[5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

For 4.1.28:
<ballot>
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
</ballot>

For 5.0.13:
<ballot>
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
</ballot>

Remy




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>]

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
> 
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>
>>> For 4.1.28:
>>> <ballot>
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [x] Beta
>>> [ ] Stable
>>> </ballot>
>>
>>
>> My BS2000 is still not working OK.
> 
> 
> Is it some kind of server powered by alien technology ? Or does it mean 
> Bulls*** 2000 ? Cool name for a server if it does :-D

Best Server 2000 :-)

> 
> Anyway, I don't think anyone here can fix this without some help. First, 
> is it a regression over older TC 4.1.x releases ?

No that is no regression, just that I need a little more time to finish my 
(EBCDIC) porting. But the problems I have found (and started to fix) may also 
exist on other platforms and there are quite a lot of change in this new release.

> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
>> For 4.1.28:
>> <ballot>
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [x] Beta
>> [ ] Stable
>> </ballot>
> 
> My BS2000 is still not working OK.

Is it some kind of server powered by alien technology ? Or does it mean 
Bulls*** 2000 ? Cool name for a server if it does :-D

Anyway, I don't think anyone here can fix this without some help. First, 
is it a regression over older TC 4.1.x releases ?

Remy



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>]

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> For 4.1.28:
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [x] Beta
> [ ] Stable
> </ballot>

My BS2000 is still not working OK.

> 
> For 5.0.13:
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> </ballot>
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

Henri Gomez wrote:

> Remy Maucherat a écrit :
> 
>> For 4.1.28:
>> <ballot>
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] Stable
>> </ballot>
>>
>> For 5.0.13:
>> <ballot>
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> </ballot>
>>
> 
> They didn't include my late patch to remove setKeepAlive from JTC ?
> 
> We should avoid problem with JDK 1.2/1.3 users ,(

Ah. That connector is deprecated, so I was planning to ignore the bug 
report ;-)

Remy



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>]

Remy Maucherat a écrit :

> For 4.1.28:
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
> </ballot>
> 
> For 5.0.13:
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> </ballot>
> 

They didn't include my late patch to remove setKeepAlive from JTC ?

We should avoid problem with JDK 1.2/1.3 users ,(


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

Henri Gomez wrote:
> Remy Maucherat a écrit :
> Mea culpa.
> 
> JTC from TC 5 hsa better support for gzip and could now use regexp
> to avoid that non compatible browsers use gzip or http 1.1 ;-)
> 
> BTW, less branches, less works

There are also many other tweaks (improved buffering = better network 
efficiency), more debugging features, so I think it is worth it. But now 
we need to test it ;-)

Remy



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>]

Remy Maucherat a écrit :

> Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
>> One question.
>>
>> Why do we need to vote on that?
>> AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable.
>> and the 5.0.12 was Beta.
>>
>> IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease.
>> If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not
>> release at all,
>> or vote for a Stable, if you dare ;-).
> 
> 
> I think most felt that it shouldn't be stable until the specs are 
> released (I asked already). Hence, I didn't put "Stable" as an option 
> (although I really wanted to).
> 
>> For 4.1.x, it would be strange to release 4.1.28 as Alpha, having 4.1.27
>> as stable, so again (True/False).
> 
> 
> That's a good point, but there's a major change in 4.1.x: we included 
> the j-t-c from Tomcat 5, which could cause regressions, and so it is 
> important to test it.

Mea culpa.

JTC from TC 5 hsa better support for gzip and could now use regexp
to avoid that non compatible browsers use gzip or http 1.1 ;-)

BTW, less branches, less works


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

Mladen Turk wrote:
> One question.
> 
> Why do we need to vote on that?
> AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable.
> and the 5.0.12 was Beta.
> 
> IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease.
> If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not
> release at all,
> or vote for a Stable, if you dare ;-).

I think most felt that it shouldn't be stable until the specs are 
released (I asked already). Hence, I didn't put "Stable" as an option 
(although I really wanted to).

> For 4.1.x, it would be strange to release 4.1.28 as Alpha, having 4.1.27
> as stable, so again (True/False).

That's a good point, but there's a major change in 4.1.x: we included 
the j-t-c from Tomcat 5, which could cause regressions, and so it is 
important to test it.

Remy



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

RE: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

[Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>]

One question.

Why do we need to vote on that?
AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable.
and the 5.0.12 was Beta.

IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease.
If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not
release at all,
or vote for a Stable, if you dare ;-).

For 4.1.x, it would be strange to release 4.1.28 as Alpha, having 4.1.27
as stable, so again (True/False).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Remy Maucherat
> Subject: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES
> 
> 
> For 4.1.28:
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
> </ballot>
> 
> For 5.0.13:
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> </ballot>
> 
> Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org