You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@arrow.apache.org by "Weston Pace (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/08/09 00:03:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (ARROW-16740) [C++] Remove IR Consumer

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Weston Pace resolved ARROW-16740.
---------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 10.0.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Issue resolved by pull request 13301
[https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13301]

> [C++] Remove IR Consumer
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-16740
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16740
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Weston Pace
>            Assignee: Weston Pace
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 10.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> At one point there were two ongoing proposals for serializing exec plans.  An Arrow proposal (ir_consumer) and Substrait.  In general it is perfectly ok to have multiple representations of the exec plan.  So if someone wants the ir_consumer for whatever reason we can keep ti.  However, I believe the ir_consumer representation is no longer being actively maintained / expanded and so we should probably remove it to avoid confusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)